nappyroots
-
Posts
1,269 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by nappyroots
-
-
-
13 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:
No, he can't tell you why...it's becoming very clear the libs live and breathe talking points...not real facts.
kinda like the current president, he hammered on Obama's birth certificate for a long time with no facts, just flapping his jaws. I heard Trump is starting a new department. The Department of making shit up, klannity will head up this department.
-
I'm not concerned with the LSU tiger. Not even concerned with those Cowboys in Dallas even though I don't like them.
-
-
-
Any negative news against the current president!
-
Draining the dirty oil in a engine is great as long as you replace it with clean oil.
-
Can't remember what rude disrespectful thing that Trump said about the Pope last year.
-
3 hours ago, stevenash said:
I believe it's called following the rules of a system set up long ago. The Dems knew that the electoral college was, essentially, the only thing that mattered. Mr. Trump showed up the last few days of campaign in places like Michigan where the Dems so overconfidently believed they owned the vote. If Hillary had handled her tactics a little smarter, she might have won. ( But wait, isn't she the "smartest woman in the world"?) The electoral college has NO IMPACT on what happened in the house, the senate, the governorships. and the state legislatures. Best thing to do is accept the loss(losses) and move forward.
We will accept 2018 and 2020 also. Although many didn't want to accept 2008 and 2012. The people overwhelmingly wanted Obama in 2008 and 2012 I guess
-
4 hours ago, Englebert said:
You advocate for every government expenditure proposed, and are constantly saying "what has the government done for me". You can deny all you want, but it is easy to deduce your mindset.
I give , I don't and never have collected anything from the government.
-
3 minutes ago, Englebert said:
And you still want to increase the size and scale of the Federal government. That is incomprehensible to most.
Never said I wanted to increase government side, maybe we need to put a limit on Grab um personnal spending. mainly all of these golf trips. Maybe the wall money can be spent on drinking water and roads.
-
-
5 minutes ago, stevenash said:
If his approach is wrong, he will be gone after 4 years and the Republican majorities in house, senate, state legislatures, and governorships will be gone in two. If that happens, you can rest assured I will not be blaming gerrymandering or the Russians.
Im not blaming the Russians< I just say that the person with the most votes from the people should win. Demi have never won by just the electoral college only. hmmm.
-
3 minutes ago, Englebert said:
Or you only hear what you want to hear.
I would be embossed if anyone in my family acted like the current president. My kids would have gotten an are whipping.
-
3 hours ago, Englebert said:
I'm not sure why you quoted me for your reply.
And I'm not sure why you think that people on here do not want to help the truly needy. I guess when your Liberal leaders pound that lie into your skull then you capitulate. And it is particularly amusing that you feel you have the ability to analyze the internal thinking of Trump voters. Just because you are easily manipulated by the media doesn't mean all are. And your example is truly revealing as to your lack of understanding of many voters who vehemently did not want Hillary for president. You say you try to figure out who truly deserves help, but then advocate for the Federal government to seize wages from the American worker to re-distribute to the "needy". The Federal government has repeatedly shown (and even admitted by you) that it is terrible at running these types of programs, and yet you advocate for more. If you were sincere in helping the needy you would advocate for more charities who are far and away more adept in identifying who is truly needy.
The federal government has been and will be doing this for a long time. This didn't start in 2008 and won't end in 2017!
-
2 minutes ago, stevenash said:
I have been in many locker rooms and have heard that kind of talk spewed by hundreds of people many many times.
I guess I was around a better class of people.
-
3 minutes ago, stevenash said:
Nope, not at all. Even though he belches at the table, I believe what he serves is considerably better for us than his predecessor who provided perfect table etiquette but served meals containing botulism.
If he serves two terms we shall see. Or if he can finish one term.
-
13 hours ago, stevenash said:
Come on guys, this is not nearly as serious as 13 year old locker room talk
I never talked like that in the locker room or no where else. That's for people that can't get the real thing. Grab um eventually was able to start buying.
-
15 minutes ago, stevenash said:
Interesting that everything Trump does, in your eyes, is ignorant but everything that Obama did, in your eyes, was "strategic", Here we go again, the veiled inference that "we" are smarter than you.
you are just the opposite, everything your man does is ok
-
50 minutes ago, baddog said:
He has balls enough Not to Apologize for anything. Tea serving etiquette is not the same as the leader of the free world bowing to anyone. Trump got a helluva reception from the Saudis. I still trust none of them, but I'll take their money.
There are a few things that orange Bas@#$D needs to apologize for
-
11 hours ago, REBgp said:
I agree. When this happened I suspected he leaked the emails. They said several Dems are nervous. Wonder if that includes the Clintons?
The Clintons are not worried, they know their buddy Trump has their back. Look at the great man of honesty, Mr Flynn now wants to plead the fifth.
-
When someone is killed by the cops you guys say wait for the evidence and respect the court system. Hillary gets the same treatment right. Are we just gonna ass-ume that she murdered someone when we don't no the facts and she hasn't been brought to trial. The sitting president said that he wouldn't go after her, even though he promised he would when he was trying to get elected. After the election he said that she had already been through enough. How convenient.
-
-
18 minutes ago, Englebert said:
What's sad is that you feel the need to comment on a bill you know nothing about. I would be willing to bet the farm that if this was a Democrat proposal you would be praising it's virtues. Regardless, you will comment exactly the way your Liberal gods tell you to comment. Now that is just sad.
I am for helping the working poor and the elderly whom have worked all of their lives and can't afford to live. Not many folks are out to help people that can and should be working (despite what Rush tries to lead us to believe). Many that voted for Trump were so worried about erasing Obama that they didn't realize that Paul Ryan and his friends with tales would be cutting their food stamps, medicare, health care and social security. Whether it be the Republican or Democratic rich that control government we need to start trying to effect their money. Ive been working since I was 12. Live pretty well and don't mind helping people that deserve it. Even when that person on the street ask for help, i try to figure out who is sincere. I usually count the ones that have cigarettes out. Race doesn't matter. Geographic location doesn't matter either. The man above ultimately controls this world.
More From The White Nationalist?
in Political Forum
Posted
your adults were in charge from 2000 to 2008, did government get smaller. and i think bush was a much better president than trump ever will be