setxathlete14

So if that translates similar D1. We may be looking at HJ/bc/liberty opt up request again?

You're outside of your mind if you think thats the only reason why BC admin took that to the UIL. What character does that show opting up for what is supposed to be used for travel purposes to play in the weakest district in the state instead of your own who whom houses some of the best teams in the state? Is that a character move? Lcm definitely lacks character about this whole situation but BC wasn't looking for a character move bringing this to light. Nor is this the reason lcm won and bc lost.

Did you read this thread? Thats exactly what's being portrayed. Im not downplaying any of the lcm guilt. But I am highlighting the fact that the band isn't the only WHAT I AM FINDING, OR NOT FINDING even a big part of why lcm won the game. Bc brought it to the uil so they could get a win. you will not convince me otherwise. After a 4 hour meeting and better game footage it sounds like the committee couldn't find anything either. Yes wrong to have the band. 100%

Past the point of guilt about lcm coach having the band. Thats clear. if you care to dig..... show me where in detail the band is 100% helping lcm win the game because this band is "clearly" the only reason why lcm won...... I am missing that part of this situation.

I don't disagree with any of that. I now am looking for a proven disadvantage personally i must be missing anything take shape fast enough on the YouTube copy.

Thats what I was looking for. Timestamps?

Im really surprised they didn't add something in the rules to include something of that nature after the bc/hj+ deal

You're confused. That was mainly the lb coach i didn't see said wr coach and accused near the DC in the first half. Maybe I missed a few snaps... this is being portrayed as he relayed the signals to the DC from the band for every BC offensive snap in the first half. Thats NOT true at all. In fact personally im not seeing anything of him looking at a band and relaying anything. If anyone else cares to share different that I could be missing.. 2 big penalties missed on BCs best passes. All 5 lineman down field on their screen passes to 5. I did just see that.

Bc attorney will be in contact after that statement. 🤣

Very interesting what's the percentage of schools down on #s 95%?

If Huffman picks up a single napkin or mouthpiece with writing on it friday. Bc taking it straight to the Supreme court.

Not downplaying anything my last post covered everything in detail. Not going to talk on here about BC and "OnLy DoInG iT FoR InTeGrIty"

I have 0 evidence of anything heresay and conflicting statements from all of us. Lcm seems wrong here and I've stated that multiple times. I've also stated give bc what they want. I know 1 thing and history shows that lcm is usually the better team regardless. Even in down years and BC is always looking for an excuse. 💯 give them the win and we'll go fishing for their band. BC opted up in football why? BC schedules one of the easiest pre district schedules in the state why?? And you think they want this investigation kicked off JUST for sake of integrity? You're sadly mistaken. Dont be reaching for excuses after the Huffman game.

Lcm won the game and does almost every year.

Write in on the whiteboard for 2026 goals and kicks their teeth in next year. Show that band or no band BC wins either way because they were the better team? Thats integrity. And thats the bc coach I know. bc wants a free win. Lcm was wrong.

That is the outcome BC wants bringing this entire situation to light with the officials who were involved. Lcm WAS wrong it sounds like. Bc wants a free win it sounds like... give bc the outcome they want all things considered correctly on here.

I do not disagree. Bc still wants a gift otherwise they can handle that after the season in person IMO bc wants the win overturned and everyone to know it because lcm had their band then destroyed the evidence. So... give it to them. Lcm and bc are focused on 2 different things. And there are MANY attributes that point to that.

OK fair enough. Give bc the win like they want and move on. Like I said above they want the easy roads. Give it to them.

Lcm is 30-19 against bridge city all time. Last year it was the refs. This year it was a watch. At this point I'd rather give them the win like they want its clear they like gifts. Look at their preseason schedule, their opting up... they WANT the easy roads. Give it to them and move on.

What was bc trying to gain here 3 weeks later? Dragging this drama into what should be preparation for other teams. I dont disagree with bc here. But it seems uncharacteristic to not be focusing on other teams instead of an lcm loss

Absolutely correct here im just curious what was bc looking to gain here bringing this situation to the table? I'd hate to be dragging this into multiple weeks preparation

And were saying THE offensive coordinator relays the plays via watch? Personally every game I've seen its a standard play sheet and vocal or hand signals.

So the watch is why lcm won the game? C'mon. Right wrong or indifferent move on.

Nick just posted lumberton moves up to 5A for soccer.

I can speak on this because I've been on both sides of this. Lcm is going on their 5th straight winning season. Producing many first(s) in school history since 1956. Are the kids any different? NOPE. Guess what the difference is and it took place almost immediately. Groups either buy in or they don't. And I KNOW nederland doesn't have a lack of athletes.