westend1
-
Posts
8,933 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by westend1
-
-
5 hours ago, jv_coach said:
UPDATE: Please note that when Andrew McCabe confirmed, earlier today, that without the Steele dossier there would have been no FISA request, he was confirming the only part of the memo that really mattered. Using that discredited dossier as the basis for the FISA request was illegal.
Where does McCabe say that there would be no investigation without the doosier? I can't find anything from McCabe
-
37 minutes ago, REBgp said:
Here's the thing. What has allegedly happened here goes way past partisan politics. It threatens our whole country. I would like to think you're an isolated example of a liberal democrat who puts Party first and country second, but alas, I think, by your response, and others I've seen on social media, that in the liberal mind, the Democratic Party can do no wrong. As they lead you obediently to the showers filled with Zyklon b.
Party first? Too funny. Blame doj and fbi because trump brought on questionable characters who lied. And plead guilty. But party politics allow you to overlook it. Get a mirror Oh, and still no admission that you have no idea what evidence was presented to the fisa judge. I’ll let you 6 guys get back to your conspiracy stuff
-
6 hours ago, REBgp said:
If you've been keeping up, you know Strzok and Park, both FBI, were Trump Haters based on their emails. And those two met with McCabe, who was Dup Dir of the FBI to discuss a contingency plan in case Trump won. All on emails. That dossier was paid for by the Hillary campaign via the law firm of Perkins Coie. Also, The Associate Deputy AG, Bruce Ohr, a Sr DOJ official, who's wife worked for GPS (who was paid by the law firm)documented the fact that Steele, who wrote the dossier, was extremely biased against Trump (Big red flag). But Ohr maintained contact with Steele even after the FBI dropped him as a source. He also supplied the FBI with all the information his wife obtained. Virtually all that I'd documented proof. So I'm at a loss to understand why it's not obvious to you that these organizations were compromised. Btw, there are many more names involved. I just hit the high points.
Lol. Who originally hired the British spy? You still acknowledge, I guess, that you have no idea what evidence was presented to the fisa judge. Funny how republicans used to be protectors from foreign influence, and now they attack the people who try to protect them . Trumpsters are strange folks
-
6 minutes ago, REBgp said:
Not sure how familiar you are with FISA warrants (heaven knows prior to this, I had none), but they have extreme checks & balances to prevent something like this from happening. Problem here is, the Judge has to make his decision based on information from our intelligence agencies & the DOJ. All this assuming those agencies are above reproach. It's obvious that under the Obama administration, the integrity of both organizations has been compromised. I know that you don't like hearing that, but it's a fact. A very scary fact. I certainly don't have evidence he was complicit, but it was on his watch.
At this time, you have no idea what was presented to the judge.( Other than an admittedly partisan memo from a guy who hasn't seen the underlying data} My guess is that there was plenty of probable cause to issue the warrant, and extend it. It is not obvious to me that the FBI and DOJ are compromised, democrat deep state Trump haters. I still believe that they were looking a people with unusual Russian ties. A couple of convictions later, I am even more convinced. I guess we shall see.
-
16 hours ago, REBgp said:
If this Memo accurately, albeit condensed, portrays the series of events:
Just based on what little I know of how our Govt works, this Event should put the fear of God in everyone. This was as close to a third world coup as you can get. Two of the most powerful organizations in our Govt, THE FBI & the DOJ, attempted to fix an election. To take away the ballot of the American people. To put into office who "they" wanted. This is analogous to a failed Military Coup. Had Hillary won, as everyone assumed she would, we'd have never known. I wonder, would we have even had an election in 2020, or would they have just anointed her Queen?
Now I'm no expert in how things function in the lofty areas of Govt, so if someone sees fault with my assessment, the stage is yours.
If you don't have shady Russian contacts like Pappadoupalas(sp) or Page. I don't think you have anything to worry about. Nothing burger
-
7 hours ago, 77 said:
How can you write a counter memo when you have not read the original memo? If iam correct they said none of the dims read it.
20 pubes 10 dims
-
On 1/25/2018 at 8:59 PM, PhatMack19 said:
The Dark web is saying that Obama has official hired legal council. This may be about to get good.
Dark web. LOL
-
-
I am sure you will post another breitbart article soon.
-
2 hours ago, Englebert said:
No, it's "let's learn from history and not follow the same failed policies". And you want to blame "Pubes" for running off posters. Remind me again who needs to wake up.
Finally. The last “genius “ of the bunch
-
6 minutes ago, Englebert said:
No, it's "let's learn from history and not follow the same failed policies". And you want to blame "Pubes" for running off posters. Remind me again who needs to wake up.
Finally. The last “genius “ of the bunch. I guess you can explain why only 5 people post here any more
-
5 minutes ago, Englebert said:
Do you actually think Hippy and others were "ran off" because of posts like Baddogs? You don't think it was the continual posts like "grab'em" and "you are all just ignorant racists"? Do you think we can't have a decent conversation on here because of the ones on the Right? Who is the one that needs to wake up?
Do you think the quality of posts on this forum has gone up or down since many on the Left have chose to abstain?
Ha. Here comes the 5th poster This site is crap compared to where it used to be. I don’t know the exact reason, but it started with smitty and continues with posters who link far right sites with almost no individual commentary
-
19 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:
It absolutely doesn't matter to the Dims. No matter how bad obama was, they think he was the next best thing since sliced bread.
20 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:It absolutely doesn't matter to the Dims. No matter how bad obama was, they think he was the next best thing since sliced bread.
Cool last president was bad so let’s do bad stuff. Pubes
-
-
5 minutes ago, baddog said:
When you don't have a comeback, call the post stupid. Typical Lefty ploy.
No, they don't post anymore because they are out of ammo.
Hippy, TVc , bandkid out of ammo? Wake up
-
16 hours ago, Reagan said:
BigGirl, TxHoops, Westend, they won't give the money back that Trump got for them!
No. You are right. My kids and grandkids can pay for it. I’ll leave them enough for my share
-
14 hours ago, baddog said:
Yep, the SOS who said it wasn't large scale according to you. I deflected nothing. Are Alabama's voter ID laws as strict Chicago's gun laws? I can see where laws can make a difference, but enforcement is the key. Did something crawl up inside you....... As usual? Lol
Yep .. These type of stupid responses are why nobody but about 5 guys post here anymore.
-
1 hour ago, Reagan said:
I'll respond. If they do then it's fair. But, supposedly there was some question of fraud.
Supposedly? Based on a video of one guy who turns out to be a registered voter? reaching much?
-
5 hours ago, baddog said:
At what point do you consider it " large scale"? From your comment, am I to assume that "small scale" voter fraud is acceptable?
Nice deflection, as usual. You said voter ID laws would stop fraud. I said Alabama has strict ID laws, and I cited the Sec of State. No response?
-
15 hours ago, baddog said:
Voter I.D. would solve all of this crap.
The Alabama Sec of State said large scale fraud was unlikely because Alabama has strict voter ID laws, FWIW
-
7 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:
Glad we got one coming, after an eight year losing streak.
If your investments lost over the last 8 years, you need a new advisor
-
27 minutes ago, baddog said:
Winning is easy. Everyone knows how to win. Losing requires character. One has to learn how to handle losing. We have seen how the left handles losing.....rioting, yelling at the sky, total denial, finger pointing, safe places, Play-Doh....sorry, got carried away.
I like winning. My 401k is skyrocketing.
Cool 8 year winning streak
-
Potato potato No difference. Hope you enjoy your pittance meanwhile, we will see within a couple of years whether he is just borrowing more money to appease the poor masses. Bread for everyone! Hurrah!
-
On 12/17/2017 at 5:04 PM, tvc184 said:
That is the rule change game. THESE ARE THE RULES.....unless we lose the majority. Backed up by Pelosi and Schumer, I have seen several media oulets stated over and over, the tax plan got no Democratic support in committee or in the roll call vote. They will likely get no votes from the Democrats if this comes up for final passage. Somehow they forget that maybe the biggest boondoggle in US history, the notAffordale Care Act, passed into law without a single Republican vote
Now they are really angry that there is no bipartisanship.
And all of the stomping of the feet is based on outright lies. The middle class will get no tax break and this is all going to the rich is just nonsense. If this was a court of law or under oath, they would all be charged with perjury.
No one likes the Good Ol’ Boy system unless they the good ol’ boy. The Dems loved it when they had the super majority but hate it when they aren’t the ones calling the shots.
On the flip side, the pubes freaked out when a bill was passed without bipartisan support. Now they complain because the new guy would like to read the bill.
Do As I Say -- Not As I Do!
in Political Forum
Posted
So she paid her property taxes in December and this is some type of scam? LOLOLOLOL