Jump to content

baddog

Members
  • Posts

    27,410
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

Posts posted by baddog

  1. Here's why I asked in the first place. It shows La Marque losing to Pearland, but after the El Campo game at the bottom in parentheses it says Pearland and confused me. Sorry.

    Date Time Opponent Result

    9/1/06 TBA Nederland (TX) W 28-21

    9/8/06 TBA @Ball (Galveston, TX) W 27-14

    9/15/06 TBA La Porte (TX) W 27-20

    9/22/06 TBA @Pearland (TX) L 14-24

    9/29/06 7:00 PM Brazosport (Freeport, TX) ** W 57-6

    10/6/06 7:00 PM @Angleton (TX) ** W 42-14

    10/13/06 7:00 PM Friendswood (TX) ** W 17-3

    10/20/06 TBA @Texas City (TX) ** W 24-14

    10/27/06 7:00 PM Santa Fe (TX) ** W 43-7

    11/2/06 7:00 PM @Dickinson (TX) ** W 47-14

    11/16/06 7:30 PM vs El Campo (TX) (Pearland) Pregame

    ** denotes league game

  2. 92, I'm not sure I agree with that statement. If kids are afraid of getting their butt kicked in football, then maybe they shouldn't play, because I don't care how good you are, that butt kicking is down the road somewhere....pre-district, district, or playoffs....it's out there. Ask a kid, heck ask your Indians if they would like a shot at the playoffs right now, or sit at home because their record wasn't good enough. I bet you already know the answer to that one, so do I. Let's say WB won the district title out right and had to play SLC in the first round. What difference does a district title make for that contest? If you are 2-8 or 10-0, SLC is going to hand it to you. in the playoffs, you earn your shot at the next round, no matter your record.

    85, it seems to me that early Ozen made the playoffs with a 2-8 record, or something like that. That woulod be considered a weak team. With a record like that, do you think most people think they deserved a shot at the playoffs? Probably not, but ask any of those Ozen players if they were glad to make it, I bet they were ecstatic..

    There have plenty of district champs with terrible records from weak districts that have gotten it handed to them in the playoffs. I don't believe those kids were scarred for life. I think it was an exciting experience for them that they will never forget. The playoff system is designed to eliminate the weaker teams so that the title game is essentially between the 2 best teams. What could be better? Like I said, if you don't belong, you will find out soon enough. Just my humble opinion.

  3. Adding a 4th team to the playoff schedule only adds one week to the DI side. If having this many teams in the playoffs is considered watering it down with weak teams, the weak teams will probably be eliminated in the 1st or 2nd rounds anyway, and these kids (we are playing for the kids right?), even though they lost out, will have something to talk about for a long time. Then there's the argument ....what if a weak team gets lucky and knocks out a strong team? Tough, it happens all the time. It's called an upset. It all comes down to money anyway. The UIL is rolling in it with all these teams. I don't have a problem with 3 or 4 teams. Like I said, if you don't belong, you'll find out soon enough, or maybe you can peak and surprise some people.....that's football.

  4. Quit exaggerating. We have never claimed to be the best in the state. In this district in the past 10 or 11 years, we have been a force to be reckoned with and always towards the top of the heap. That is something to be proud of and it just bothers some people.

    Which is worse? Someone who brags about their team's greatness and has the record to prove it, or the one who boasts of greatness but has the record to prove otherwise? Those are the ones who irk me.

×
×
  • Create New...