WOSgrad

21-5A game from Turner Stadium in Humble at 7

Austin 56, Austin Lanier 12, F Austin St. Michael's 48, Austin Hyde Park 49, F/OT Burleson Centennial 31, Arlington Seguin 27, F Cedar Hill 58, Irving MacArthur 0, F Clear Creek 10, Alvin 14, F Copperas Cove 38, Killeen Ellison 3, F Corpus Christi Carroll 0, Corpus Christi Veteran's Memorial 0, 1st Corpus Flour Bluff 45, Corpus Christi King 20, F Cypress Lakes 25, Langham Creek 69, F Dallas Adams 38, Dallas Seagoville 35, F Dallas South Oak Cliff 44, Dallas Kimball 3, F Dallas Spruce 21, Dallas Jefferson 12, 4th Del Valle 17, Austin Bowie 35, F Donna North 46, Brownsville Porter 16, F Edinburg North 0, Pharr-San Juan-Alamo 0, 1st El Paso Chapin 41, El Paso Bowie 0, 4th El Paso Pebble Hills 0, El Paso Americas 0, 1st Fort Bend Bush 27, Fort Bend Kempner 20, F/OT Frisco Lone Star 49, Frisco Liberty 10, F Fort Worth Temple Christian 0, Arlington Pantego 0, 1st Fort Worth Trimble Tech 0, Fort Worth Northside 0, 1st Houston Lamar 49, Houston Chavez 0, F Katy Cinco Ranch 10, Katy Taylor 12, F Klein Forest 0, Klein Collins 63, F La Joya Palmview 30, McAllen Rowe 28, F La Porte 62, Pasadena Rayburn 13, F Lucas Lovejoy 35, Forney 21, F Manor 21, Austin Anderson 42, F Midlothian Heritage 0, Dallas Pinkston 0, 1st Mission Veterans Memorial 45, Laredo Nixon 71, F Montgomery 43, Conroe 39, F New Caney 42, Humble 11, F North Richland Hills Richland 64, Fort Worth Polytechnic 0, 3rd Pharr-San Juan-Alamo 0, Edinburg Economedes 0, 1st Plano East 61, McKinney Boyd 0, F Port Lavaca Calhoun 17, Richmond Foster 61, F Prosper 40, Carrollton Turner 0, F Round Rock Westwood 24, Round Rock McNeil 24, OT Sanger 0, Wichita Falls Hirschi 14, 1st San Antonio Brandeis 48, San Antonio Marshall 6, 4th San Antonio Clark 25, San Antonio Jay 15, F San Antonio Southwest 21, Laredo Alexander 14, F South Garland 12, North Garland 14, F Spring 62, Aldine Davis 22, 4th Waxahachie Life 0, Fort Worth Benbrook 0, 1st

1st, she may very well be in your area, Brown is the last name so keep an eye out for her. Second, there are many more things way more important and I, like you, use this as a distraction. Third, at least you admit deficiencies, many here find their trash talk to be more witty than it usually is.

Well, they are a site sponsor. LOL!

Then please I pray that you are able to provide aid and comfort to my aunt from Louisiana who is there today to begin treatment for her cancer.

2016 HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL SCHEDULE WEEK 8 Thursday, October 13, 2016 12-6A Conroe Oak Ridge 2, The Woodlands 42, F 21-6A Channelview 56, Goose Creek Memorial 35, F 21-5A Conroe Caney Creek 14, Kingwood Park 21, F Friday, October 14, 2016 12-6A Beaumont West Brook 70, Lufkin 63, F Conroe 35, The Woodlands College Park 38, F 21-6A Atascocita 26, Humble Summer Creek 10, F Kingwood 21, Galena Park North Shore 38, F Sheldon C.E. King 7, Baytown Sterling 34, F 21-5A Dayton 34, Crosby 41, F/OT Humble 26, Barbers Hill 48, F Splendora 3, Porter 24, F 22-5A Livingston 14, Vidor 49, F Lumberton 34, Beaumont Central 35, F Port Neches-Groves 28, Port Arthur Memorial 33, F 10-4A-I Bridge City 54, Little Cypress-Mauriceville 28, F Huffman Hargrave 33, Cleveland 14, F Navasota 14, Silsbee 35, F 8-4A-II Diboll 34, Huntington 0, F Rusk 21, Tatum 38, F 11-4A-II Brookshire Royal 20, Tarkington 54, F Shepherd 54, Madisonville 21, F 12-4A-II Liberty 48, Hamshire-Fannett 13, F West Orange-Stark 62, Hardin-Jefferson 0, F 11-3A-I Buna 8, Woodville 28, F Kirbyville 58, Warren 12, F Trinity 7, Coldspring-Oakhurst 36, F 12-3A-I Hardin 0, East Chambers 42, F Hempstead 12, Hitchcock 44, F La Marque 36, Anahuac 23, F 10-3A-II Crockett 60, Corrigan-Camden 32, F Hemphill 20, Frankston 30, F Newton 43, Garrison 6, F 11-2A-I Price Carlisle 28, Alto 7, F San Augustine 54, Cushing 7, F Shelbyville 18, Joaquin 29, F 12-2A-I Lovelady 43, Deweyville 0, F West Hardin 0, Groveton 49, F West Sabine 29, Centerville 55, F 12-2A-II Evadale 61, Burkeville 20, F Hull-Daisetta 46, Colmesneil 30, F Iola 55, Sabine Pass 14, F 16-1A-I Gilmer Union Hill 56, High Island 6, F Leverett's Chapel 63, Chester 18, F TAPPS 6-III Houston Lutheran North 0, Houston Northland Christian 54, F League City Bay Area Christian 7, Beaumont Legacy Christian 55, F Magnolia Legacy Prep 48, Sugar Land Logos Prep 3, F The Woodlands Christian 24, Pasadena First Baptist 21, F Tomball Rosehill Christian 6, Cypress Christian 48, F TAPPS 6man 8-II Lake Jackson Brazosport Christian 51, Conroe Covenant Christian 76, F Orange Community Christian 40, Alvin Living Stones 13, F 4A vs. Louisiana Class B Slaughter (LA) Charter 12, Jasper 34, F Private 6 man Crosby Victory and Praise 65, Clear Lake Christian 20, F Saturday, October 15, 2016 22-5A Nederland 28, Beaumont Ozen 8, F Private Baytown Christian 47, San Antonio Lutheran 0, F

Okay, now that I have had a chance review the pick 'em threads as well as your posts, I feel truly confident in posting the following, I promise to go reeeeeal slow so that you can uuuuuunderstaaaaand: Ifffffff youuuuu waaaaant to be showwwwwwn in the Picccccck 'Em reeesults, youuuuuuuu muuuuust maaaaaake piiiiiiiicks. Go ask Ms. Wolfe about it. She'll explain things to you.

What the heck are you talking about?

Not according to their website. Between you and me, we got all of the listed ones.

The original in Jasper and the newest one in Bridge City.

I wasn't aware, either. I think outanup was referring to the Nederland location.

[Hidden Content]

MrUmp1 - 125 Englebert - 119 oldbuc77 - 119 prepballfan - 119 #CodeRedCoog - 116 bballfan342 - 116 easttexiasbias - 116 no-look - 116 Rebel 85 alum - 116 CAL2TEX - 115 CRUSHCOACH - 115 oldschool2 - 115 pdawg119 - 115 Bobkat - 114 Honest Abe - 114 REBgp - 114 TxHoops - 114 AggiesAreWe - 113 bheagle1724 - 113 LCM17 - 113 Lightning/Eagle - 113 liltex - 113 robanadana - 113 TexasPanther2012 - 113 Jake94 - 112 skipper - 112 24 over par - 111 jayhawk - 111 Stattrax - 111 workbootz - 111 ballup - 110 BigMike0726 - 110 NeDeRlAnD b-DoG fAn - 110 One4All - 110 Volleyball - 110 ace2335 - 109 eagleswoodville#1 - 109 Pepper Brooks - 109 biaplayer - 108 pickle - 108 pinelandflash - 108 indianforever - 107 Cat22 - 106 aTmfan06 - 105 Chester86 - 105 NDNation - 105 Broncos87' - 104 CardinalBacker - 104 pitufo04 - 104 bullets13 - 103 earlwick - 103 lp4life - 103 Silsbee92 - 103 Footballfan1209 - 102 WestHardinfan1 - 102 BigPanther - 101 BS Wildcats - 101 raideroldtimer - 101 Vpirate - 101 OctFeb - 100 TradenupBH - 100 Kegger - 99 #JIGEAGLE - 98 Mr. Buddy Garrity - 98 86hawk - 95 tigerheart - 94 BellBiz - 90 The Icon - 90 EaglesFootball - 84 Sunoco - 82 IndianSoldier - 75 NedKCMO - 73 SteelerCzy - 68 ozens fastest@1906 - 59 USC 35 - 55 yeahprobablynot - 55 GCMinTheFuture - 54 409ANALYST - 53 ccsbasketballplayer - 52 Daytonfan9210 - 49 Shamrock - 41 Count Coog - 38 PantherTakeover - 38 dBerrySports - 37 EAGLESFOREVER - 35 AthleticSupporter - 32 chukslegacy - 32 milkguy - 32 pakronos - 29 88 warrior - 22 78Stang - 21 L-Train11 - 20 wosgrad-84 - 20 navydawg31 - 19 setxnative96 - 19 H-D BOBCAT 55 - 18 JB94 - 18 jv_coach - 18 wo-76 - 18 Huperikomen - 16 walldrill - 16 Back2swag - 13 Sleepy - 12 BC Cardinal97 - 11 SB63 - 10

Oh, so you wish to bring up a 24 year old issue to make you feel better (yes, folks he is talking about something that happened back in the 1990's)? When WO-S coaches unknowingly played a kid who had an incomplete (not failing, but incomplete) which rendered him ineligible? Yes, he played and WO-S forfeited those games, costing them a district championship and a playoff spot. Interestingly enough, no coach from WO-S received a reprimand from the (then) 20-4A district executive committee. Now, we fast forward to 2016 (24 years later!) and we have a coach who played a player for whom he sought a waiver. A waiver that is only appropriate after the DEC rules that a player has not met VERY BASIC residency requirements and rather than wait on the UIL to provide that waiver, he rushes him to the field, only to pay the price. WO-S knows better, a very talented kid named Alex Williams enrolled at WO-S last year, but rather than risking the work of his athletes, he did not allow Alex on the field for a game. You know, just when I think some of the folks who post things about Nederland might be a little harsh, learned gentlemen like you post things like this and remind me why they feel justified in doing so. I hope you had fun with your stone.

Dear god! Not again!

Well, I don't know that any on either rob's list or mine have a deep run in the playoffs in them. But at this point, the playoff chances for most if not all of them are better than even.

From the article I read, Neumann agrees with you.

Based upon my reading of Gabe's story as well as the appropriate UIL rules, that is my understanding as well.

Please free to enlighten us.

I don't normally agree with 14.2, but I think he has a valid point in that Crosby, more than anyone, has suffered by the UIL's refusal thus far to divide 5A into DI and DII in the same manner as 4A through 1A. In the second round, they are facing teams who even though they are some of the smaller teams in their district, still dwarf Crosby's ADM and have probably added 200-300 students (at least) since the ADM's are taken.

I think you overestimate the value of instigating threads. Let's just say that I don't share your opinion and more importantly, neither does the guy who pays all of the bills for the site that you and I get to play on. And again, he has not been banished. If he chooses to post here, he is free to do so in accordance with the forum rules, pinned at the top of this and every other forum for all to read. If he doesn't, he doesn't. But if you believe I am going to add my name to those here who wish to kiss his hind end in some hope of bringing him back, you are mistaken.

[Hidden Content]

I have not heard anything one way or another. If fact, I'll have to look to see what sort of deadline to make an appeal exists.

That's the million dollar question. From what I read the waiver which was requested has nothing to do with whether Coach Harrison and the PAISD administration signed the PAPF without incident. The waiver was from the eligibility requirement which is stated in Rule 403 (f), which states that a student is eligible for competition: f) is a resident of the member school district (See Section 442), and a resident of the attendance zone in which the member school being attended is situated: (1) or has been continuously enrolled in and regularly attending the school for at least the previous calendar year if his or her parents do not reside within the school district’s attendance zone; see (5) (B) below for exception. Note: A student who has changed schools for athletic purposes may be declared ineligible for more than one calendar year. See Section 443 (f) (3). For students placed on a waiting list for admittance to an open enrollment charter school that is a member school, the earlier of the first day of enrollment or the first day of school for the school year following the date of application begins the time frame for compliance with the exception noted in this section... So what I infer (rightly or wrongly) is that the DEC can rule that a player has not transferred for athletic purposes, yet still rule him ineligible due to failure to comply with residency requirements. Did the DEC make such a ruling? Absent an appeal of the DEC's decision of the forfeit to the State Executive Committee and a resulting full hearing, you and I will probably never know the answer to that question.

Well, I know that when I got word of the denial of the waiver that I still did not change either Nederland or Livingston's standings or season results and the State ruling regarding the Katy/Manvel playoff game did enter into that decision. However, the result today came as no surprise as that ruling last year was an anomoly even for Katy, who not only was removed from the baseball playoffs in the incident that ECBucFan noted, but also pulled from their buses on the way to a football state championship game a few years back. Also, remember that the decision today to compel the forfeit was not at the state level but at the district level. And if this message board is indicative of one thing, it is that, protests of district unity aside, there is not a whole lot of love lost amongst the schools in 22-5A.