Jump to content

AggiesAreWe

SETXsports Director/Manager
  • Posts

    91,115
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    666

Everything posted by AggiesAreWe

  1. These are the enrollment numbers for the HISD 4A schools in the last realignment (per UIL): 21-4A Austin          1904 Reagan        1842 Waltrip        1789 Davis          1563 Sharpstown  1239 Yates          1209 Sterling        1103 22-4A Wheatley          1101 Worthing          1013 Washington        946 Furr                  865 Scarborough      733 Jones                686 Kashmere          596 Washington, Furr, Scarborough, Jones and Kashmere have had 3A numbers for the past several years. Sterling, Wheatley and Worthing would be the next likely schools to drop to 3A.
  2. [quote name="Dick Vitale" post="1167813" timestamp="1327869090"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=94937.msg1167810#msg1167810 date=1327868796] [quote author=Dick Vitale link=topic=94937.msg1167807#msg1167807 date=1327868470] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=94937.msg1167798#msg1167798 date=1327867415] I still say Yates will end up with 4A numbers. Last realignment they had over 1200 students and cutoff for 3A was at 990. Just don't see them dropping more than 210 students in just 2 years. But, it's possible. [/quote] Yeah its possible, but [b]doubtful that it happened like that[/b]...Spoke to some folks yesterday in the HISD loop, and they indicated that the community is totally against going to 3A...I think that they were not counting the 200+ kids that are in the School of Communications program at Yates, that do not LIVE in the zone. Thats ONE of the explanations that I got about the numbers...Its SO many ways that schools can fudge those numbers one way or another in order to get the outcome that they desire...HISD athletic dept. is not particularly crazy about it either. I may GO to the re-alignment meeting next week...Its gonna be GOOD! 8) [/quote] Doubtful that it happened like what? What are you speaking of? HISD did not check the box to opt up for Yates, so that tells me they are content on having Yates go where their numbers place them. The snap shot day was back in October, so the numbers have been sent in. Problem is, HISD did not make those numbers public like other districts did on snapshot day. [/quote] I was stating that it was doubtful that the numbers just dropped so rapidly in just two years..I was saying that maybe they failed to count those Communcation students who live OUTSIDE the zone..Thats what I was told, anyway...There was a reason HISD kept those numbers private....I guarantee.. ;)...I don't think they really WANT to go down..They may HAVE to, but I don't believe thats the desire though. [/quote] If HISD does not WANT to go down, then why didn't they just check the box to opt up, regardless of the numbers, like they have done the past 3 realignments? BTW, who do you men by THEY when you state "they failed to count those Communication numbers who live outside the zone"? The snapshot number is how many students are enrolled in said high school, all campuses. Not how many students live within the school zone.
  3. [quote name="Dick Vitale" post="1167807" timestamp="1327868470"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=94937.msg1167798#msg1167798 date=1327867415] I still say Yates will end up with 4A numbers. Last realignment they had over 1200 students and cutoff for 3A was at 990. Just don't see them dropping more than 210 students in just 2 years. But, it's possible. [/quote] Yeah its possible, but [b]doubtful that it happened like that[/b]...Spoke to some folks yesterday in the HISD loop, and they indicated that the community is totally against going to 3A...I think that they were not counting the 200+ kids that are in the School of Communications program at Yates, that do not LIVE in the zone. Thats ONE of the explanations that I got about the numbers...Its SO many ways that schools can fudge those numbers one way or another in order to get the outcome that they desire...HISD athletic dept. is not particularly crazy about it either. I may GO to the re-alignment meeting next week...Its gonna be GOOD! 8) [/quote] Doubtful that it happened like what? What are you speaking of? HISD did not check the box to opt up for Yates, so that tells me they are content on having Yates go where their numbers place them. The snap shot day was back in October, so the numbers have been sent in. Problem is, HISD did not make those numbers public like other districts did on snapshot day.
  4. [quote name="vp32" post="1167805" timestamp="1327868253"] Now the question is who is Nederland gonna replace WOS with on there schedule. God i can't wait till Thursday. [/quote] It was said that Nederland will play Crosby, Goose Creek Memorial and Angleton.
  5. Went to Silsbee's intra-squad scrimmage on Saturday. WOW!!!!!!! Silsbee is the best team I have seen all year so far! They are my #1 team!
  6. [quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1167758" timestamp="1327860333"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=95065.msg1167749#msg1167749 date=1327858955] PNG will be playing two 3A schools to start the season the next two years. Week 0    Silsbee Week 1      WOS [/quote] Any idea what the third game will be? [/quote] Humble Summer Creek in week 2.
  7. I still say Yates will end up with 4A numbers. Last realignment they had over 1200 students and cutoff for 3A was at 990. Just don't see them dropping more than 210 students in just 2 years. But, it's possible.
  8. [quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1167748" timestamp="1327858558"] My tops are in unranked order & ready for the next level: Ken Coleman-Memorial Ira Brooks-Silsbee Clay Davis-Hardin-Jefferson Passion, knowledge, and know what the heck they are doing ;) [/quote] Cannot believe you left out the best assistant coaches in the area. You know, the ones in the bleachers. List starts with: BLUEDOVE3 dawg13 True Blue BMTSoulja1 Tebow
  9. PNG will be playing two 3A schools to start the season the next two years. Week 0    Silsbee Week 1      WOS
  10. Here is the pickem schedule for Tuesday, Jan. 31st: Baytown Sterling @ West Brook (-8) (-13) North Shore @ PAM (-5) Crosby @ CE King (-10) Dayton @ Baytown Lee (-6) Central @ LCM (-22) Ozen @ Vidor Lumberton @ PNG (-8) (-15) Nederland @ Livingston Pollock Central @ Jasper (-11) (-7) Hamshire-Fannett @ Orangefield Silsbee @ Hardin-Jefferson (-4) (-29) WOS @ Bridge City Shepherd @ Huffman (-7) Splendora @ Coldspring (-13) Deweyville @ East Chambers (-28) (-34) Kountze @ Anahuac Warren @ Hardin (-4) Hull-Daisetta @ Evadale (-17) West Hardin @ Big Sandy (-13) Spurger @ Goodrich (-22) Remember to get your picks in by 6:30pm Tuesday, thread will be locked at 6:30pm. Good luck!!!
  11. [quote name="Rizon" post="1167626" timestamp="1327809215"] Didn't they graduate a lot? Do they have a lot of key players returning? [/quote] Yep.
  12. [quote name="XDOG" post="1167358" timestamp="1327731629"] Well Aggie they do when it comes to 3a [/quote] I'll take the coaches knowledge on the other classifications as well. ;)
  13. [quote name="Allen Gamble" post="1167590" timestamp="1327802671"] What does silsbee have that puts them on this list [/quote] Shhhhhhhh.... it's a secret.
  14. [quote name="beechnut" post="1167499" timestamp="1327780610"] Same to you and keep the updates coming. [b]When is the next time Huffman plays?[/b] [/quote] [Hidden Content] ::)
  15. The opening and closing of the doors are the same at both gyms. Fans from both sides get left out. The seating arrangements are not the same, unfortunately.  ;)
  16. [quote name="vp32" post="1167578" timestamp="1327800128"] You didn't put me on the season standings. [/quote] Done
  17. [quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="1167544" timestamp="1327794802"] Tied for first?  I'll take that!  ;D [/quote] With a soccer expert. ;) ;D Blind hogg.
  18. Attended the game. Lamar played well, need to keep it up. Good crowd, over 3000. Not sure I like these afternoon games. I know Harper is suspended and Lynch flunked out, but I thought we had 13 players on the roster. There were only 10 suited out today. Who was missing and why?
  19. Guys don't forget, we will be having two polls. 5A-3A and 2A-Private.
  20. According to eyewitness accounts from both sides, this was totally unnecessary. The thing is, both teams only have 8 players on varsity. So, in regards to putting reserves in and pulling starters, Goodrich had to leave 2 starters in. Now, what is very questionable about the game was how the 2nd half was played by Goodrich. Totally unnecessary and that came from a Goodrich supporter. Just a shame things get this way. What comes around goes around but you still have to show some respect and not kick a team when it is that down.
  21. Season standings thru Friday Jan. 27th: (members who have played 5 pickems) Bulldog10              66-34    66% AAW                    61-39    61% BMTSoulja1            60-40    60% dogs1218              59-41    59% LUcardiac              59-41    59% 5gallonbucket        58-42    58% Rebel Yeller            58-42    58% bullets13              56-44    56% DogFan3                56-44    56% ST413                  56-44    56% knightrider              55-45    55% NB-Dawg              55-45    55% Water Boy 21        55-45    55% PoppaBearstarr      54-46    54% (members who have played 4 pickems) SmokeFan13            49-31    61% mercedes                40-40    50% (members who have played 3 pickems) bball2011                    41-19  68% Dick Vitale                  33-27  55% #1 Manager                29-31  48% (members who have played 2 pickem) Kelly Basketball          23-17  57% ForeverADog              20-20  50% 86hawk                      17-23  43% (members who have played 1 pickem) 2% Milk                    15-5  75% whsalum                  14-6  70% Bobcat05                  12-8  60% Lightning/Eagle          12-8  60% vp32                        12-8    60% 5 on 5                      10-10  50% sharkfutbol                10-10  50% BigDaddy00                8-12  40% jabu84                      8-12  40%
  22. Here are the results from Friday's (Jan. 27th) pickems: BMTSoulja1                    13-7    65% bullets13                        13-7  65% Kelly Basketball              13-7    65% bball2011                      12-8    60% Dick Vitale                      12-8  60% vp32                            12-8    60% Water Boy 21                12-8    60% DogFan3                        11-9    55% Bulldog10                      10-10  50% LUcardiac                      10-10  50% Rebel Yeller                    10-10  50% mercedes                      9-11  45% PoppaBearstarr              9-11  45% ST413                          9-11  45% BigDaddy00                    8-12  40% dogs1218                      8-12    40% knightrider                    8-12  40% AAW                            7-13    35% 5gallonbucket                7-13    35% NB-Dawg                      6-14    30% #1 Manager                  6-14    30%
  23. LaMarque's basketball record this season: 3-22 ::)
×
×
  • Create New...