LumRaiderFan

Good article...no one appreciates a gun free zone more than the bad guys.

  LOL...what a ridiculous article...LOL.   You guys on the left really need to shake this Fox derangement syndrome.

  Because most Republican politicians, like Democrats, are always minimizing damage in order to be re-elected and realized this story was about to be about Bundy's views rather than the BLM's actions and anyone lining up with the guy is a racist.   Can you show me in the Constitution where the fed gov has the authority to hold and control large blocks of land?

  Can you provide a list of lies that the NRA has put forth...I can assure you I can provide you with a list of lies from Obama.

  The support came from those that think the fed gov has no business owning massive amounts of land that should belong to states/private landowners...and when not paid, come charging in like a special forces unit.   What happens in a situation like this should never involve federal taxpayers.    And what does him being a racist have to do with any of this, other than taking the attention away from the thuggish actions of the BLM?

THAT'S IT......You are SANCTIONED!   not really   [Hidden Content]

  Now THAT will be a major league conundrum for the left!

  Possibly...if so, the welfare growth continues.

  If he's leading, it's nowhere I want to go.

[Hidden Content]   When asked what her biggest regret was, Hillary Clinton said:   "It would certainly be the attack on our facility in Benghazi, and the loss of, uh, two State Department personnel and two CIA contractors from the terrorist attack and the terrible consequences of that," she said.   Good deal...she's sorry...now let's put this nonsense behind us and elect her President.  SMH

  Correct...and these comments were made by a rancher that has no political power.   Remember what Harry Reid said about Obama...    He was a "light skinned" African-American "with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one"   ...and he is the Senate majority leader...isn't it strange how selective the left is about who and what they get incensed over?   What is sad is that this has taken the spotlight off the pathetic handling over this by the BLM and made it into "get the bad guy because he deserves it."

  Hmmm...sounds like Cliven Bundy should have gotten a bonus.

  Heard that interview yesterday...could not name even ONE accomplishment.   The sad truth is many won't even pay enough attention to hear this and many that hear it won't even care.

Dodd and Frank hosed us with the housing bubble... Bush isn't President and hasn't been for 5 years so just accept it...this is now your guy's mess.

#9 Obama invoked “executive privilege” to help Eric Holder conceal Fast and Furious documents from congressional investigators and the American public.   Always wondered, if he didn't know anything about this as he said, (read about it in the paper, just like the rest of us  :rolleyes: ) why would he need to invoke executive privilege?

  I think many on the right are opposed to the fed gov having huge blocks of land and controlling them, instead of the states/private landowners handling the property themselves.   If the states/private landowners had control, you would most likely see the boom going on in Wyoming and the Dakotas happening everywhere,  even in ANWR.   I think that anyone, left or right, should be concerned with how the Bundy situation was handled.

Anytime a pipeline, power line, etc. is proposed there are multiple, sometimes dozens of alternative routes that are looked at and passed by affected landowners...they will find a route.   Some folks would never want the pipeline on their land and some would love having it for the income it provides.   Looks like these folks won their case...so are you saying the fed gov has given the green light to the Keystone pipeline and private landowners are the only obstacle?   And eminent domain does stink for those affected, but I bet you drive the interstates/highways and use the utilities that were provided by it.

More on the Red river confiscation.   [Hidden Content]

Here's another idiotic question...is the Keystone pipeline completion being held up by the fed gov or private landowners? Please provide a link with your response.

  A very dismal article except for the last statement:   “We will lose seats in the House,” he said. “I am fairly certain of that based on the poll numbers that are coming out from the more experienced pollsters down there, and I think we may lose the Senate.”   :) 

  Here is another one of Obama's "advisers" that comes out well on a delayed Keystone pipeline.   He is even getting his railroad improvements paid for by someone else.   [Hidden Content]   Now if this delay was really about the environment, wouldn't a pipeline be much safer than thousands of railcars?   Buffet bought the railroad in 2010...what a stroke of luck and great timing! 

  No, but if I had my way, there would be no more SS or medicare confiscation.   I am much more capable of providing my own "social security" than the fed gov.

  Reminds me of Ruby Ridge, except no one has been killed...yet.

When you click on the link, go to "Ripped out of the Bible" and it will download a .pdf   Good comparison of the versions...Floyd Jones used to drive to Lamar from Houston to teach.   [Hidden Content]

  I agree that the fed gov should own and maintain missile sights, military bases and other facilities for national security (actually in the Constitution)...I was more referring to the National Forests/Parks, BLM.    I don't think it should have ownership of million of acres that should belong to and be managed by the states.