LumRaiderFan

If folks from all over agree with your views, why has something like homosexual marriage been voted down regularly...even in places like California.

Right...I'm sure if you polled most parents they would have no problem with cross dressers teaching their kids. Pretty sure I'm more in tune with this than you are...at least in Southeast Texas.

Lumberton parents who have kids involved in this disagree with your group.

An accomplished cross dresser...well, why didn't you say so. And you're wrong...cross dressing middle school teachers would be welcomed in very few places.

If you don't like Fox, don't watch it...MSNBC can always use a few more viewers.

Wow...the MAN that dressed as a WOMAN and was in charge of middle school kids would only bother you if they dressed provocatively or pushed their agenda on the kids. Now who's the radical? I guarantee you not too many parents would want their kid in that environment.

  You won't hear a word from them since Cruz is their guy...just like you didn't hear any backtracking from the Bush surveillance critics about Obama expanding the U.S. surveillance program because he is their guy.

  I'd say there were a few more "non-particularly intelligent" folks that voted for Obama than were pushing the birther issue.

  So you applaud him for a political tactic that managed to mask his failures...hmmm.   IMO, the people that looked ridiculous are the gulpers that were fooled by this and voted for him again.   Sadly, the joke is on all of us!

  [Hidden Content]   You can get different interpretations depending on which expert you go with.   I will agree with you one one thing...anyone that was playing the birther card on Obama had better throw it down on Cruz.   Speaking of hypocrisy...I'm sure the national media will scrutinize Cruz in the same fashion they did Obama over this.

  It will be an interesting debate.   [Hidden Content]

  I won't become more and more radical, the climate will become more and more "progressive" if anything.   Progressive...what a joke!

Yep, that's what they want...to wreck the environment...you got us.  :rolleyes:     But thanks for making my point...you and many others seem to think that the fed gov is the only agency that can solve a problem.   Let's see, what is the problem?   Hungry kid..fed gov program Unwed mother...fed gov program School curriculum...fed gov program Toilet capacity..fed gov regulation Wood burning stove emissions...fed gov regulation   I believe Texas and any other state are capable of managing their own resources much better than the fed gov.

  The notion of following the Constitution to the letter, smaller gov so we can have lower taxes...these are radical ideas to many...no wonder we're in trouble.   The Tea Party formed because the Republicans were big gov spenders, just like the Democrats and conservatives no longer had representation...the only thing they wanted out of the elected Republicans was to quit spending more money than the fed gov took in and cut wasteful spending and bloated agencies and programs.   If that is radical (and it is to a progressive liberal) count me in as a radical.

[Hidden Content]

  I'll try again...radical in what way?

  The big deal is this isn't something that the fed gov should even have on their radar.  Billions of dollars are wasted by this massive bloated fed gov because they feel they should oversee and regulate every area of our lives...and staff up to do just that.   And it will continue because there are many like yourself that go "what's the big deal?"  Let them go ahead and do it.   I feel most states are very capable to decide what type of wood stove can be sold or how many gallons of water a toilet flushes.   The fed gov has a very short list of responsibilities as stated in the Constitution for a good reason.

  The answer is no...and that could be said about a thousand other things they meddle in  Problem is, too many people feel the fed gov should be regulating every area of our lives.

  Oh yeah...Gotcha.  Radical in a conservative kind of way.   The masses are much too enlightened to elect a guy like that.

Radical in what way?

Country's' not individually independent enough to elect a ticket like that...last two elections are proof.

[Hidden Content]

Oh, the tolerance from the left on free speech...as long as they agree with your "free" speech.   [Hidden Content]   In a blog post Thursday, Mozilla's executive chairwoman, Mitchell Baker, apologized for Mr. Eich's appointment, writing, "We have employees with a wide diversity of views.(some we WILL NOT tolerate) Our culture of openness extends to encouraging staff and community to share their beliefs and opinions in public (obviously not)…But this time we failed to listen, to engage, and to be guided by our community."   What a load!

What the heck is wrong with some people?

Only thing you can do is take down the feeder because the birds can't won't change!