All Activity

1A DI #2 Union Hill #22 Chester #39 Leverett's Chapel #44 Burkeville 1A DII #28 Apple Springs #46 Calvert #64 Buckholts

2A DII #19 West Sabine #34 Colmesneil #42 Deweyville #47 Evadale #63 West Hardin #101 Sabine Pass

2A DI #8 Joaquin #17 San Augustine #27 Garrison #29 Shelbyville #31 Timpson #93 Hemphill

3A DII #1 Newton #17 Hardin #35 Woodville #51 New Waverly #78 Kountze #87 Warren

3A DI #21 East Chambers #28 Fairfield #35 Palestine Westwood #37 Orangefield #48 Diboll #56 Buna #63 Trinity #67 Anahuac #78 Crockett #84 Kirbyville #89 Coldspring #94 Tarkington #98 Huntington

Trying to deflect from the fact that bc caught lightning in a bottle and is back to being the 🤣 of the district

4A DII #6 Hamshire-Fannett #10 West Orange-Stark #14 Silsbee #42 Hardin-Jefferson #47 Shepherd #53 Jasper

4A DI #38 Vidor #48 Little Cypress-Mauriceville #59 Huffman #60 Lumberton #61 Bridge City #82 Livingston #87 Liberty

5A DII #10 Port Neches-Groves #13 Montgomery #17 Huntsville #21 Nederland #23 Lake Creek #42 Texas City #50 West Fork #51 Dayton #57 Splendora #62 Porter #71 Santa Fe #81 Kingwood Park #91 Baytown Lee #104 Galena Park #109 Spring Woods

1. North Shore at Summer Creek 2. New Caney at Galveston Ball 3. PA Memorial at La Porte 4. United at Goose Creek Memorial 5. Dayton at Santa Fe 6. Texas City at Port Neches-Groves 7. Kingwood Park at New Caney Porter 8. Lake Creek at Splendora 9. West Fork at Huntsville 10. Huffman Hargrave at Bridge City 11. Livingston at Little Cypress-Mauriceville 12. Vidor at Lumberton 13. Jasper at Silsbee 14. Shepherd at Hardin-Jefferson 15. West Orange-Stark at Hamshire-Fannett 16. Anahuac at Buna 17. Coldspring-Oakhurst at Kirbyville 18. Orangefield at East Chambers 19. Diboll at Crockett 20. Fairfield at Palestine Westwood 21. Newton at Hardin 22. Warren at Kountze 23. Woodville at New Waverly 24. San Augustine at Timpson 25. Evadale at West Sabine

5A DI #7 Port Arthur Memorial #21 La Porte #37 Beaumont United #43 Beaumont West Brook #48 Baytown Sterling #49 Goose Creek Memorial #57 Lufkin #64 New Caney #72 Galveston Ball

Week 7 computer rankings for our coverage area teams: 6A #2 CE King #3 North Shore #9 Summer Creek #27 Atascocita #41 Barbers Hill #95 Crosby #107 Kingwood #139 Humble #242 Channelview

1. North Shore 2. New Caney 3. PA Memorial 4. United 5. Dayton 6. Port Neches-Groves 7. New Caney Porter 8. Lake Creek 9. Huntsville 10. Bridge City 11. Little Cypress-Mauriceville 12. Vidor 13. Silsbee 14. Hardin-Jefferson 15. West Orange-Stark 16. Buna 17. Kirbyville 18. East Chambers 19. Diboll 20. Fairfield 21. Newton 22. Kountze 23. New Waverly 24. Timpson 25. Evadale

I have a feeling OF is going to find a way somehow. I can see that backup getting some more playing time if Mr 4 year isn't getting it done. Any of you OF diehards hear the word on the street that Breaux is jumping ship after this year? Just what I've heard from some buddies of mine that bleed orange and white.

tt

tt

tt

This has turned out to be such a fickle district. At this point I'm better off predicting where my wife wants to eat. Give me BC by 10

East Chambers is solid. OF struggled to score last week in the redzone, and was only able to walk away with 13 points offensively. That being said I am taking EC on this 41-14.

1. Not the govts job….just another way to misuse taxpayers money 2. also rewrite the tax code 3. Expanding govt does not benefit the people 4. It’s whatever… 5. Not the govt s job just t another way to misuse taxpayers money 6. not the govts job just another way to misuse taxpayers money 7. Murder

I agree, Defense played a heck of a game, and scored the only points, They were given the short field many times, and still only held them to 13 points( Not including the scope and score by OF D). I am sure that things will get turned around. My only hope is that it happens before Playoff opportunities are taken away.

The Texas law says, “with the intent” to commit the assault, “administers or provides to the victim”. So is merely giving or providing it to her with intent to commit the assault a crime? I would say yes but I don’t have a clue how the DA would approach a situation where she asked for the drug. If the “intent” to commit the assault is giving the drugs, the intent overcomes any question of how she took it. That is to say that the person knew that it would render her incapable of refusing or resisting the sex act. There has been at least one case where the woman volunteered to take ketamine under a doctor’s care but then the doctor was accused of sexually assaulting her. So voluntarily taking the drug doesn’t necessarily negate the crime. That goes back to my original comment about not being able to say no. Even if a girl says, let’s take some drugs and get high, once she is unable to consent or say no, it doesn’t matter if she took the ketamine. She could have just as well voluntarily drank alcohol until she passed out. At that point it is still without consent. A guy can’t believe, she voluntarily got drunk so I can have sex with her. In reference to this case, it wasn’t a single guy but the accusation was several and with comments like free sex upstairs. If that can be proven, I don’t know how a guy can claim that a woman I don’t know consented to sex while she is unconscious or almost so even if she took the drug voluntarily. In this case I doubt that the issue will be whether she knowingly took the ketamine because knocking her out likely ends all other debate. The huge problem will be the time frame of the accusation and the gathering of evidence. Now if an eye witness(es) comes forward…….

Appreciate the work.

computer rankings and picks should be posted today.....editor still working out the kinks in the new admin panel... most of the bad data on team pages and schedules has been cleaned up at least for UIL 11man since I did it lol....if there's something wrong w/a team page email me and I can fix it [email protected]

Maybe. Funny thing is, they've been in position most of the time. They're just not completing the play. So, I can't really say it's the coaching. Yes, they have allowed some explosive plays. But, the coverage has been better than previous years. It's almost like Lufkin against BU. Lufkin's D isn't near what they showed against BU. I don't know how many TO's LP has created. But, I don't remember many at all.