All Activity

They almost won 7on7 last year also. Doesn't necessarily mean they're going to be unbeatable.

I know it was just 7 on 7…. But based off what happened last week at the state 7 on 7 and Matt being there then he probably got a good view of what they have skill position wise… Hopefully we will see… but solid chance these two ain’t playing in the state semi finals.

LOL, me? You're the never Trump anything...... Don't call me names because your mad at Trumps hiring decisions🤣

Who mentioned you? Thought you didn’t like making it personal.

As OlDawg just said, the CBO has been wrong, so I'm not listening to them. No, I have not read the 900 pages, and I won't believe you have, People who were against Doge, are now up in arms about spending??🤣 Please.......who is the hypocrite? None of that matters tho, because, like Obamacare, that was worse than this bill could EVER be, Republicans have the votes.....and Vance won't need to break a tie

The way our system is set up not everyone gets what they want. But, you see, I don't understand how some can continue fighting against cutting waste, fraud and abuse. I presume you and I have different ideas what should be cut.

Yeah I don't recall myself being there, its called bipartisan, something lost these days, same as Manchin killing the D's bill i applaud him for that... we get it your for more debt and unnecessary spending...

CBO has a credibility problem. They haven’t even been close in so long, they’re pretty irrelevant. DOGE ‘em. Save some money.

My kids are grown but I have grandkids coming up. Heaven help anyone trying to teach them this perversion in school.

The same people applauding Rand Paul are the same ones who almost attacked him in the streets. He feared for his life. Typical.

[Hidden Content] On 🔥 lol

I can’t believe you said this.

Amazes me how some ppl are... wanting more debt on top of what we have... if your against this your a "rino" Un American etc.. thank you rand paul

The Trump administration doubled down on its war on veterans as the Department of Veterans Affairs outlined plans to fire 80,000 additional workers after having already removed 6,000 ([Hidden Content]). According to the March 4 memorandum ([Hidden Content]), the plan is to implement a reduction in force (RIF) in August to reduce staff to 399,957 employees, the staffing level in fiscal 2019 prior to the passage of the PACT Act, which expanded veterans’ benefits. The VA has been severely understaffed for years, causing veterans to have to wait too long for the care they need. New hiring waves took place after Congress passed the PACT Act that promises benefits to veterans who either died or became ill as a result of exposure to burn pits, Agent Orange, and other toxic substances. The federal government is the largest employer of veterans, who make up about 30% of the federal workforce compared to only 6% in the civilian workforce. More than 640,000 veterans worked for the federal government before Trump’s layoffs. More than half of them are disabled. The administration fired 2,400 probationary employees last month. Veterans fired from their jobs feel betrayed ([Hidden Content]) by Trump. AFGE is calling on Congress to intervene. “Until Elon Musk and Donald Trump came on the scene, America never turned its back on our veterans and their families. Their reckless plan to wipe out the VA’s ability to deliver on America’s promise to veterans will backfire on millions of veterans and their families who risked their lives in service for our country,” said AFGE National President Everett Kelley.

That's your opinion and it almost makes sense but your probably wrong again. #2 was the house and he's gone. Good bit of the exterior of the front 7 is gone.

👏👏👏

Sheep.

Again it went over your head. I will continue to respond when Doge and this president fires Veterans and Federal workers because they are not the best qualified or because of wasteful spending. These men and women deserve better. let’s not start with 🤡 requesting to raise the debt ceiling in this so called beautiful bill and the big beautiful clown parade.

Have u read through the bill? U approve of all this spending? Fiscally conservative smh

I'm leaning more and more to the fact that--as people begin to understand the real idiocy of universal birthright citizenship for people in the country illegally as class actions are attempted to be defined--more may understand this wasn't the true intent of the 14th or the Nationality code. SCOTUS may have given us a bigger clue than initially thought. A court would basically have to say their ruling is a pardon for breaking another law. Almost a chicken and egg scenario. Break the law, then get rewarded by the court system that's supposed to uphold the law? Are immigration laws any less important than the 14th? To me, anyone who says, “Because it’s in the Constitution” is just being intellectually lazy. Or, they really do have an agenda to change the electorate. (Of course, I dealt more with contract law than this other stuff. So, no expert by any means.)

Yes but it can be done. There are about 900 federal district court judges. They are, like I mentioned, the federal equivalent of our county courts. So if one judge doesn’t like a political executive order, if someone files for an injunction with the stroke of a pen he banned the other 900 judges from an opinion. There are more steps in certifying a class action lawsuit or injunction. The class has to be so large as to make it a burden to file individually. The class has to have the same claim of the violation. Such as, is a person being deported because of an overstayed visa, the person had a green card but was convicted of a crime, the person entered the country illegally, etc. While they all deal with deportation, they are from different causes so they may not fit in a class. I believe there must be a finding that the class will win in the action. There must be a belief that all members of the class will benefit from the action. Again, is being deported because asylum was denied the same as being deported as a legal resident but being convicted of a crime? If no, in my opinion they aren’t in the class. Also the claims of a defense must be the same. So my deportation is illegal because I have a permanent resident green card whereas another person may say, my deportation is illegal because I asked for asylum. Those are not the same defenses. So while a class action is certainly possible, there are more hoops to jump through to make it universal (nationwide). A federal judge always has the authority to issue an injunction in his district. The issue is can he force other courts across the country into his decision? I suspect that even though the lower courts have been admonished by the Supreme Court, some will soon disregard the decision by simply certifying everything as a class action.

Class actions require a few extra steps. Yes, can get same results. But, it will be interesting to see a court certify harm to a group of ‘future anchor babies’ since their parents are breaking the law. Create a law for those breaking the law by entering the country illegally? I could see the court easily certifying a class action for those here now. Especially, one of the judges that already ruled the EO unconstitutional. Future? Not quite sure that will fly. Will definitely take some twisting. How would the court define and certify harm to anyone from anywhere at any time in the future who happens to have a baby while on U.S. soil? Would seem overly broad for a certified class action. This question will be at SCOTUS again this fall as Bondi said. Meanwhile, it will stop at a judgement from an appeals court since SCOTUS doesn’t return until October. My thoughts.

In wrapping up this session the Supreme Court finished strong. In the last couple of days we have: Trump v. Casa - The Supreme Court said that federal district judges have been greatly overstepping their authority in issuing universal injunctions. As an example from what I googled, G W Bush had 12 universal injunctions in 8 years. Obama had 20 in 8 years. Trump has had 40 in less than 5 months. Of those, 35 were issued in only 5 districts. So out of almost 100 federal district courts, 5 have been used as a hatchet job. Anything that Trump does, take it to one of those federal courts and end it. Had Obama had this happen so the same pace as Trump, he would have had 900 universal injunctions, not 20. Mahmoud v. Taylor - In Montgomery County, Maryland, the school board decided that several LGBTQ books would be used from Pre-K through 5th grade. The district however had an opt out option if the teacher used the books for class assignments. Not so shockingly, the school district was stunned at the volume of opt out requests. So they changed the policy to no opt outs allowed for any reason. The Supreme Court struck down the ban on an opt out choice as it violated the First Amendment right to freedom of religion. Apparently some people have forgotten or haven’t understood that freedom of religion at school doesn’t mean only that religion can’t be pushed at public schools but it also can’t be denied. Seriously, who thinks that reading books on sexuality starting at 4 years old is a good thing… much less forced. Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton - Yep, a Texas case. Texas passed a law where accessing online adult content sites required age verification. The FSC claimed that it violated the free speech of adults to require age verification. The Texas law did not ban anything but only required age verification. The FSC claimed that showing your age violated the Constitution. The Supreme Court said that the state governments already restrict such material from over the county sales and a person can be asked to verify age by producing an ID. The same is true for tobacco and alcohol sales as examples. So why should digital media have less of a standard? The Supreme Court said that it didn’t and having as age requirement for online material that minors might access is no different than face to face, over the counter transactions. Overall it seems like a great couple of days from SCOTUS.

This was a good ruling and fair. Question, they are saying now they can do a "class action" and get the same result. Is that going to be more difficult to do?

Oh, the fear mongering for all the anchor babies over this ruling has been outstanding! 😂🤣 If you don’t get twisted in knots over that issue, apparently the entire public education system in this country is going to fail because parents can opt out of forced teaching their kindergartners about transsexuals and gay marriage in the public school system. Heaven help us all… Anyone for a little R.E.M. ‘End of the World’? [Hidden Content]