The Art of the Squeal

[UT alum]

President Surrender squealed “calf rope” to the country he claimed three months ago he would accept only “unconditional surrender” from. This is the most embarrassing foreign policy blunder in American History. Not to mention costly. Get their oil back flowing. Give them their money back, à la Obama. Kick in $300 billion more to help them rebuild what we destroyed. Fix everything back the way it was before it started. The nuclear weapons agreement is even less stringent in wording than the Obama/Kerry deal.  Not winning. Humiliating defeat.

[thetragichippy]

14 minutes ago, UT alum said:

President Surrender squealed “calf rope” to the country he claimed three months ago he would accept only “unconditional surrender” from. This is the most embarrassing foreign policy blunder in American History. Not to mention costly. Get their oil back flowing. Give them their money back, à la Obama. Kick in $300 billion more to help them rebuild what we destroyed. Fix everything back the way it was before it started. The nuclear weapons agreement is even less stringent in wording than the Obama/Kerry deal.  Not winning. Humiliating defeat.

Not surprising.....

There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of.

That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing......

[UT alum]

48 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Not surprising.....

There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of.

That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing......

That option was not negotiated. Bombing is an option that always exists. Why wouldn’t they live up to the agreement? It’s basically the sane one they had. I would have approved of him never starting this fiasco.

[baddog]

3 minutes ago, UT alum said:

That option was not negotiated. Bombing is an option that always exists. Why wouldn’t they live up to the agreement? It’s basically the sane one they had. I would have approved of him never starting this fiasco.

This war had been waging for decades. To say that Trump “started” it is simply finger pointing. I’m shocked.

[Slim Charles]

54 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

Not surprising.....

There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of.

That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing......

That's the thing, right? It wouldn't matter what the outcome was, what was in the MOU, none of it. TDS sufferers would still parrot the same MSM talking points and say how terrible it was. Their entire platform is Trump bad...that's it. It's why their entire party is being taking over by the DSA and far left radicals. The mid-terms will be the judge. 

[OlDawg]

I’m amazed at all the criticisms/kudos for an agreement that doesn’t yet exist…