Birthright citizenship supporters get the law wrong by ignoring obvious evidence

[LumRaiderFan]

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[Reagan]

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

Personally I think it's quite obvious what it was meant for.  It was meant for the freed slaves to be able to become citizens of the US.  Now, I don't think it's a coincidence that the 13the Amendment freed the slaves.  Then the 14th makes sure they get citizenship.  But the telling part is:  "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"!  If a tourist comes and gives birth, that person is not "subject to our jurisdiction."  I really don't think our founding fathers had this is mind.  But why has it been perverted over the years.  Could just be ignorance.  Could be fraud involved.  Who knows?  But I think the Supreme Court will right this wrong!   

[Big girl]

On 12/29/2025 at 12:31 PM, Reagan said:

Personally I think it's quite obvious what it was meant for.  It was meant for the freed slaves to be able to become citizens of the US.  Now, I don't think it's a coincidence that the 13the Amendment freed the slaves.  Then the 14th makes sure they get citizenship.  But the telling part is:  "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof"!  If a tourist comes and gives birth, that person is not "subject to our jurisdiction."  I really don't think our founding fathers had this is mind.  But why has it been perverted over the years.  Could just be ignorance.  Could be fraud involved.  Who knows?  But I think the Supreme Court will right this wrong!   

Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction.  If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail

[OlDawg]

11 hours ago, Big girl said:

Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction.  If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail

Not the same ‘jurisdiction’. Please read the link below for a better understanding of the arguments ‘for’ and ‘against’ automatic birthright citizenship for anyone on U.S. soil.

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

A really simple explanation about citizenship is found in the final act of an immigrant becoming a citizen the LEGAL way. The last thing they have to do?

Say the Pledge of Alllegiance, or the Oath of Allegiance.

Now, they are fully under the jurisdiction of the United States.

(Remember the Pledge of Allegiance? What we all had to say in school before the liberals decided they’d prefer a multicultural, non-cohesive country with no identity, pride, or patriotism because it was all offensive to someone?)
 

 

[tvc184]

20 hours ago, Big girl said:

Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction.  If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail

Not according to a Supreme Court ruling.

Native Americans born on US were not citizens if born on an Indian reservation. It literally took an act of Congress under Article I to make them citizens.

Although born on US soil, they were subject to the laws and jurisdiction of the Indian nation to which they belonged.  

[Reagan]

22 hours ago, Big girl said:

Anyone on US soil is subject to our jurisdiction.  If a tourist came here and killed someone. He is going to jail

Big girl, you need to start thinking with your mind instead of your heart!