America Spends $7.8B Monthly On SNAP, Remove ILLEGALS From SNAP The Cost Would Reduce 70%!

[LumRaiderFan]

5 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

But my point was it didn't matter to those on the right where this subject came from. It was something that supported that side, came from a MAGA supporter so therefore all of you guys took it as truth. Not one of you (other than baddog) cared to verify the data. You had no motivation to verify the data because that supports what you support. Just said prove it wrong. 

Even some said it didn't matter if Elmer Fudd posted the data. 

I am betting that had a lefty posted, some of you would have provided many sources to either verify or dispute. You would not have taken their word.

All I am saying, let's not be so blind. How about posting real sources and not leftwing or rightwing social media influencers.

It’s funny that DCT made post after post after post that was simply AI generated with no sources and not a peep from you or anyone else, which is fine, don’t need the help, lol.

Thanks for proving my point again, if us rightys disagree with a post, we post rebuttals.

It seems you only get involved in something like this when it’s a Reagan post, never ever seen you challenge some of the ridiculous posts from the leftys.

As a moderator, either be fair or simply stay out of it.

 

[Porter]

1 hour ago, bullets13 said:

Well, if through limited research Porter has determined that she’s pretty accurate sometimes, that oughta be good enough for everyone I guess. You’re falling back on the same “it’s up to other people to prove random stuff that’s posted on Twitter wrong” argument again. If her numbers are correct, Reagan should be able to find a real source for them. Or more importantly, why didn’t she post the source herself? Anyway, feel free to get the last word in so we can get back on topic. 

Let’s not forget you questioned me and was derogatory towards me about my post so yes I will get the last word if I want too.
 

Over the years I can’t count how many times I’ve seen someone post a source and you dismiss it because you didn’t like the source so cut the nonsense. You seem to think you are the orbiter of truth and sources which is a joke it self. You seem to get real bent when someone post something off Twitter/X but you have no problem believing 3 letter agencies like the CDC, FBI, DOJ etc. 😂

Your credibility is as solid as your covid post. If you want to talk about legitimate sources. Lol

[AggiesAreWe]

1 minute ago, LumRaiderFan said:

It’s funny that DCT made post after post after post that was simply AI generated with no sources and not a peep from you or anyone else, which is fine, don’t need the help, lol.

Thanks for proving my point again, if us rightys disagree with a post, we post rebuttals.

It seems you only get involved in something like this when it’s a Reagan post, never ever seen you challenge some of the ridiculous posts from the leftys.

As a moderator, either be fair or simply stay out of it.

 

I agree. I'll start being fair.

Also will start doing the job that you suggested. Policing this forum for violations. It seems some of that is not being fairly done down here.

[Porter]

16 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

But my point was it didn't matter to those on the right where this subject came from. It was something that supported that side, came from a MAGA supporter so therefore all of you guys took it as truth. Not one of you (other than baddog) cared to verify the data. You had no motivation to verify the data because that supports what you support. Just said prove it wrong. 

Even some said it didn't matter if Elmer Fudd posted the data. 

I am betting that had a lefty posted, some of you would have provided many sources to either verify or dispute. You would not have taken their word.

All I am saying, let's not be so blind. How about posting real sources and not leftwing or rightwing social media influencers.

Again ill ask you like I ask all knowing bullets what is the go to all truthful source so yall will agree with all post by anyone?

If we’re talking about being lazy it sounds like to me the ones that don’t believe a post but refuse to do any research on their own are the lazy ones. They would rather attack the messenger instead of the message. Lol

[Porter]

5 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I agree. I'll start being fair.

Also will start doing the job that you suggested. Policing this forum for violations. It seems some of that is not being fairly done down here.

So are you saying there’s moderaters that get to question sources but the moderator is not allowed to be questioned? 
 

 

 

[AggiesAreWe]

12 minutes ago, Porter said:

So are you saying there’s moderaters that get to question sources but the moderator is not allowed to be questioned? 
 

 

 

I didn't say that.

Was replying to LRF about the personal attacks and violations in this forum and he suggesting the mods handle the business better.

[Porter]

4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I didn't say that.

Was replying to LRF about the personal attacks and violations in this forum and he suggesting the mods handle the business better.

Oh…ok

I am sure no moderators would do anything like that. Cough Cough Lol

[LumRaiderFan]

12 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I didn't say that.

Was replying to LRF about the personal attacks and violations in this forum and he suggesting the mods handle the business better.

To be clear, you brought up the personal attacks and I said I couldn’t do anything about that, only moderators could, I wasn’t calling for more stringent control.

For the most part, I have no problem with the job the moderators do here, it’s a fairly hands off approach, with only a few that I can recall that were removed, by their own doing.