Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
12 minutes ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

Hindustan Times is considered a major and influential English-language daily newspaper in India,
 and is generally viewed as center-left politically. However, its reliability and objectivity are subject to varying perspectives: 
Points of credibility
  • Long-standing publication: Hindustan Times was founded in 1924, making it one of the oldest newspapers in India.
  • Wide readership: It's the second most widely read English newspaper in India, according to 2014 and 2017 reports.
  • Known for journalistic standards: The publication emphasizes high editorial standards, timely and accurate news, and in-depth analysis. 
Points of concern
  • Accusations of bias: Critics have accused Hindustan Times of bias, including accusations of being pro-government, 
    This is the hidden content, please
     and displaying Ukraine-phobic rhetoric.
  • Content quality concerns: Some readers express concerns about "ultra biased titles and instigating thumbnails" in their videos, and catering to the "extreme right".
  • Ownership ties: The newspaper is owned by the Birla family, and it's been argued that ownership structures can influence editorial policies.
  • Rankings: In Brand Trust Reports from 2012 to 2014, Hindustan Times ranked within the top 3000 to 360 most trusted brands in India. However, another report from 2017 stated it was the second most widely read newspaper after Times of India. 
Posted
29 minutes ago, baddog said:

 

Hindustan Times is considered a major and influential English-language daily newspaper in India,
 and is generally viewed as center-left politically. However, its reliability and objectivity are subject to varying perspectives: 
Points of credibility
  • Long-standing publication: Hindustan Times was founded in 1924, making it one of the oldest newspapers in India.
  • Wide readership: It's the second most widely read English newspaper in India, according to 2014 and 2017 reports.
  • Known for journalistic standards: The publication emphasizes high editorial standards, timely and accurate news, and in-depth analysis. 
Points of concern
  • Accusations of bias: Critics have accused Hindustan Times of bias, including accusations of being pro-government, 
    This is the hidden content, please
     and displaying Ukraine-phobic rhetoric.
  • Content quality concerns: Some readers express concerns about "ultra biased titles and instigating thumbnails" in their videos, and catering to the "extreme right".
  • Ownership ties: The newspaper is owned by the Birla family, and it's been argued that ownership structures can influence editorial policies.
  • Rankings: In Brand Trust Reports from 2012 to 2014, Hindustan Times ranked within the top 3000 to 360 most trusted brands in India. However, another report from 2017 stated it was the second most widely read newspaper after Times of India. 

It is so easy to find a biased article based on what you WANT to believe. 

The media did a great job of convincing people Trump is a Russian asset.....some folks on this forum still believe it.....lol

Posted
41 minutes ago, thetragichippy said:

It is so easy to find a biased article based on what you WANT to believe. 

The media did a great job of convincing people Trump is a Russian asset.....some folks on this forum still believe it.....lol

I agree.

I compare this news source as the same as the Gateway Pundits of the world that get posted here daily.

Posted
2 hours ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

It’s obvious that y’all want Trump to fail with Putin, even to the point of siding with Putin so as to make Trump look inferior. So which is it, you want Trump to succeed and end the war, or you want the war to continue so that Trump looks bad. You can’t have it both ways, and it’s amazing how quickly you stab your own country in the back just to get at Trump. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Posted
8 minutes ago, baddog said:

It’s obvious that y’all want Trump to fail with Putin, even to the point of siding with Putin so as to make Trump look inferior. So which is it, you want Trump to succeed and end the war, or you want the war to continue so that Trump looks bad. You can’t have it both ways, and it’s amazing how quickly you stab your own country in the back just to get at Trump. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

I’ll answer.

Trump failing is more important to liberals and fake libertarians than anything else, more important than national security, the economy, fair trade, or anything else I could list.

Sad but true.

Posted
3 hours ago, baddog said:

 

Hindustan Times is considered a major and influential English-language daily newspaper in India,
 and is generally viewed as center-left politically. However, its reliability and objectivity are subject to varying perspectives: 
Points of credibility
  • Long-standing publication: Hindustan Times was founded in 1924, making it one of the oldest newspapers in India.
  • Wide readership: It's the second most widely read English newspaper in India, according to 2014 and 2017 reports.
  • Known for journalistic standards: The publication emphasizes high editorial standards, timely and accurate news, and in-depth analysis. 
Points of concern
  • Accusations of bias: Critics have accused Hindustan Times of bias, including accusations of being pro-government, 
    This is the hidden content, please
     and displaying Ukraine-phobic rhetoric.
  • Content quality concerns: Some readers express concerns about "ultra biased titles and instigating thumbnails" in their videos, and catering to the "extreme right".
  • Ownership ties: The newspaper is owned by the Birla family, and it's been argued that ownership structures can influence editorial policies.
  • Rankings: In Brand Trust Reports from 2012 to 2014, Hindustan Times ranked within the top 3000 to 360 most trusted brands in India. However, another report from 2017 stated it was the second most widely read newspaper after Times of India. 

It quotes a Fox News reporter

Posted
40 minutes ago, baddog said:

It’s obvious that y’all want Trump to fail with Putin, even to the point of siding with Putin so as to make Trump look inferior. So which is it, you want Trump to succeed and end the war, or you want the war to continue so that Trump looks bad. You can’t have it both ways, and it’s amazing how quickly you stab your own country in the back just to get at Trump. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

The war needs to end now.

Posted
2 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

It is so easy to find a biased article based on what you WANT to believe. 

The media did a great job of convincing people Trump is a Russian asset.....some folks on this forum still believe it.....lol

Trump cares for no one but himself. It’s not in him. He’s playing Putin and Zelenskyy and NATO to make himself look good. You can tell everyone what they want to hear only for so long…

Posted
49 minutes ago, baddog said:

It’s obvious that y’all want Trump to fail with Putin, even to the point of siding with Putin so as to make Trump look inferior. So which is it, you want Trump to succeed and end the war, or you want the war to continue so that Trump looks bad. You can’t have it both ways, and it’s amazing how quickly you stab your own country in the back just to get at Trump. Liberalism is a mental disorder.

This. The deranged Dims hate Trump so much, they WANT the USA to suffer and the world to burn down. Just to point fingers at Trump. Its a sickness. I never hated the USA or the world under Obama and Biden. Just the opposite, I prayed for it.   

Posted
16 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Trump cares for no one but himself. It’s not in him. He’s playing Putin and Zelenskyy and NATO to make himself look good. You can tell everyone what they want to hear only for so long…

That’s gotta be it, he took the job and pay cut so millions of delusional liberals and the media could hate on him daily.

Only way he can look good is to succeed, which I’m pleased to see you acknowledge.

Posted
6 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Just like criticizing a source without even looking into the story, which seems to pass as wisdom on here.

Simply opinion.

It’s done daily on here. Especially if you disagree.

Posted
22 minutes ago, UT alum said:

Trump cares for no one but himself. It’s not in him. He’s playing Putin and Zelenskyy and NATO to make himself look good. You can tell everyone what they want to hear only for so long…

To what end result? To end the war? 

For the life of me I can't see all the criticism of Trump for trying to end a war that has killed around 2 million people. 

The same people holding silent while Obama and Biden did practically nothing. 

Posted
1 minute ago, thetragichippy said:

To what end result? To end the war? 

For the life of me I can't see all the criticism of Trump for trying to end a war that has killed around 2 million people. 

The same people holding silent while Obama and Biden did practically nothing. 

I’m curious to see how this plays out.  The meeting today should do just that.

Posted
3 hours ago, Big girl said:

This is the hidden content, please

Of course this is an opinion hit piece.  Why?  Because India was caught buying oil from Russia.  Plus, Trump busted them with huge tariffs as punishment.  I don't think anyone in the world, with the also exception of Putin, thought Trump got steam rolled.   

Posted
1 minute ago, DCT said:

I’m curious to see how this plays out

You and me both. 

Trump made a huge deal about ending this war during his campaigning. That day 1 stuff was a mistake because people took him literal.  If he does not get it to end, that's going to be a dark mark on his legacy. 

Posted
1 minute ago, thetragichippy said:

You and me both. 

Trump made a huge deal about ending this war during his campaigning. That day 1 stuff was a mistake because people took him literal.  If he does not get it to end, that's going to be a dark mark on his legacy. 

If he pulls it off I’ll give credit where it’s due.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Big girl said:

The war needs to end now.

Thanks to Biden, it's harder to end a war than to prevent one.  Putin did say that if Trump was President the previous 4 years, this war would have never started.  He knew Biden was weak.  Remember, under Trump the first time NO wars was started.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,292
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    DoggStyle
    Newest Member
    DoggStyle
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...