DCT Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, thetragichippy said: I have a feeling you are going to be disappointed. My other questions, is one of the "Victims" threatened to release "the list" she created if Docs were no unsealed..... Why does she not make it public? My guess there is no list and she was paid by Epstein's estate and if she discloses any info (true or false) she will forfeit the money......So, maybe the money is more important than the truth....... None of the parties opposed unsealing a significant majority of the documents sought by the Times and the Journal, according to the judge’s order. But certain redactions, even in those filings, must remain. “All the parties agree that, because Epstein’s victims have strong interests in their privacy, the victims’ identifying information should remain sealed,” Rakoff wrote in a 17-page ruling, which was dated for Friday but docketed on Monday morning. JPMorgan Chase objected to unsealing 36 of the exhibits sought by the newspapers. I believe that records documenting the flow of money into Epstein’s accounts from persons who may have been involved in his sexual abuse of minors. ( from the article) If this reveals the names of the parties involved and the Congress women is sworn in, a lot of people may be in for the shock and awww. Quote
DCT Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 59 minutes ago, DCT said: I believe that records documenting the flow of money into Epstein’s accounts from persons who may have been involved in his sexual abuse of minors. ( from the article) If this reveals the names of the parties involved and the Congress women is sworn in, a lot of people may be in for the shock and awww. I know you agreed she should be sworn in but Republicans are doing there best to protect a rapist Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.