Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

The UK stripped titles and kicked him out of the castle, oh the horror.

Sex trafficking has been around a long time, why only the interest lately from you and your friends?

Why PPP when he ran on that promise.  This was all self inflicted.

His attorney general dropped a major bomb. You know the story.  Why not just ask the victims? 
5 administrations dropped the ball.  Trump twice according to the victims.  
The victims video will educate you and anyone else who supports PPP.

Posted
7 minutes ago, DCT said:

Why PPP when he ran on that promise.  This was all self inflicted.

His attorney general dropped a major bomb. You know the story.  Why not just ask the victims?

You probably won’t ever get answers, at least not until Trump finishes that third term.

Posted
19 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

You probably won’t ever get answers, at least not until Trump finishes that third term.

I hope he runs🤞.  The victims want answers.

Posted

(Credit to SHIPWRECKEDCREW@X) 

From a real non-biased attorney who understands law 

So, posting here to see all this playout in real time......But HEY, they got the bill passed in record time🤣

Thomas Massie is a genius.

But even though he is on the House Judiciary Committee, he seems to have no actual understanding of how the enforcement of laws work in the criminal context.

He told Kaitlin Collins yesterday that if there is a failure to comply with his statute, it will be enforced criminally, and people will go to jail.

1.  The only thing the statute does is force the creation of a searchable and downloadable database of materials.

2. The statute orders the Attorney General to create this database.

3. The statute leaves a variety of discretionary judgments to the Attorney General on what documents to include.

4.  The statute does not include any provisions that give notice to anyone that non-compliance is a criminal offense. 

5.  Massie says "their" -- he and Khanna -- method of enforcement will be "legal." 

But here is the problem that shows how little Massie understands about the law:

The obligation to create the database is placed upon the Attorney General.

Who is it in the U.S. government that is given the authority to decide when to bring criminal charges and who to charge?

Due process under the 5th Amendment requires "Notice and Opportunity to be Heard".

Where in the statute is "Notice" provided that non-compliance is potentially a criminal offense?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,488
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ZebraHat35
    Newest Member
    ZebraHat35
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...