Jump to content

Port Arthur Memorial (23) @ Barbers Hill (52) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

Just now, Crawdad said:

So win out and I believe this is the outcome….

Three scores between 3 schools count as positive and negative and then add 
PAM +10 -21 ( maximum )=-11
LaPorte +7-10 =-3
BH +21-7=+14

Therefore if all three win out BH 1st seed 
LaPorte 2nd seed
PAM 3rd seed

We hold the tiebreaker over LP, how would we be 3rd? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Crawdad said:

That’s probably right….that sounds logical….i was going on what I was told…

10 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

That's what I figured. 

I’m being told in a 3 way tie all games should be equally weighted to determine 1st, 2nd, 3rd…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kenny powers said:

Crow being served tonight! 

I ain’t eating it… I told them this was gonna happen… I was told BH wasn’t physical when I said they were. BH was the better team in all phases. Out coached Mr. Coach Kline. I’ll go on record and say those teams up north, is better than ANY team PAM has faced this year. That’s not a slight on BH. If you can’t dominate from start to finish in the playoffs, u will be one and done. You not coming back in the second half… if coach Kline don’t find his notebook, KWP gonna bust’em in the MOUF!!! The only positives I can draw from tonight is PAM is young. And 2, the band was a bright spot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...