Jump to content

Liberty (6) @ Silsbee (61) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Tigers had two of their best defenders not suit up tonight.

Going to need them next week against Hamshire-Fannett

No they want need them.the things that Silsbee does on defense will HF alot of problems.especially when they send there Lbs.debo zeno will struggle against this team.miller is clearly the best player in this area.no one can check him. 42-14 Silsbee easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dj said:

No they want need them.the things that Silsbee does on defense will HF alot of problems.especially when they send there Lbs.debo zeno will struggle against this team.miller is clearly the best player in this area.no one can check him. 42-14 Silsbee easy.

Miller is probably one of if not the best player in 4A if we are being honest. I do think Silsbee wins but I think HF scores 20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some individual numbers for those interested:

Liberty 175 Total Yds

Fontenot 8-18 56 Yds 1 TD 2 INTs

Victorian 8 Car 91 Yds

Wilkinson 3 Rec 38 Yds 1 TD

 

Silsbee 609 Total Yds

Brisbane 13-17  242 Yds  4 TDs  1 Fum

Miller  5 Rec  134 Yds  2 TDs

Kibbles  13 Car 74 Yds 1 TD /  1 Rec TD

Brown 10 Car 78 Yds 1 TD

Martin 6 Car 91 Yds 2 TD

Baltrip 75 Yd TD (Fake Punt)

Silsbee Defense 

2 INTs (Miller/Baltrip)

2 Fum Rec / 6 TFLs

Lorenzi  2 Sacks / Fum Caused

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...