-
Member Statistics
45,988
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
Okay. That is a good argument. There is no law prohibiting the stocks and the Supreme Court was correct by the letter of the law and Constitution but citizens should refuse to buy them. If every person voluntarily turned theirs in and refused to buy any, I am okay with it. It won’t stop the willing from anything however. -
From the article: "In some ways, the dispute over the 2000 presidential election will never end. Witness Vice President Biden's comments Wednesday about predecessor Al Gore. "This man was elected president of the United States of America," Biden said at a fundraiser that Gore also attended. "No, no, no. He was elected president of the United States of America." WOW!! And no one was indicted for questioning the results an this election. Amazing how times have changed. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl @UT alum @CardinalBacker @Boyz N Da Hood What say you?! -
What you are failing to realize is this….. you act as if the only reason this person committed this heinous crime is because of bump stocks. My realization is that he would have done it anyway. Bump stocks did not create this crime, he did. You need to learn where that line really is. -
By thetragichippy · Posted
If you want bump stocks banned, you are going to need Congress. -
By CardinalBacker · Posted
This is my point, made initially. We, as gun owners, should demand accountability from those who manufacture and sell these things. But instead we argue "but it's our RIGHT to own them," thereby insuring that another mass killing happens in the future. At which point in time we'll wring our hands, offer thoughts and prayers, say how it's not a gun that kills, but rather a hard heart that kills. Gun manufacturers and sellers don't mind threats from people who were never going to buy from them anyways. If actual gun owners were to threaten a boycott of businesses that produce/sell bump stocks, they'd disappear from the market. But instead we take the losing side of an argument on philosophical grounds. We don't need the feds with more regulations or congress to pass new legislation... we, as consumers control the market. What's available, etc. WE, as the actual customers of weapons should be using our voices to determine what is produced/sold by the gun industry.
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.