Jump to content

*Beaumont Bowl Game 2..Central vs. West Brook Predictions??*


KFDM COOP

Recommended Posts

I realy dont' care about history at this point in time.  I'm talking about now.  I've seen both teams and I believe they are pretty evenly talented.  If we win, then you can throw your history lesson out the window.  All I have to say is step on the field! ;D ;D

Any time you have a rivalry game, history plays a part in the discussion. WB wins NOW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Soulja, dude you cool as h---. After all that badgering you held together. They can say history,pass three years, Ozen taking some of the talent, what ever. None of that will be worth da da, tommorow night. It's gonna be settled on the field. Best two teams in Beaumont head up. May the best team win. I could say Central's gonna win, but I really don't know. I could predict a score. But, come on I don't know and no one on this thread really knows. Now if Brook does win, I'll be surprised. That's only because i have so much confidence in does Jags. I think we got our swaggle this year. This will be settled By 11:00 tommorow night. Can't wait to read the Central WestBrook after game thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are right Solja....100%, and even more truth.....West Brook should not be forced to play these two 4a teams like they are.......The only way this gets stopped is for West Brook to keep winning........then BISD 'BIGS' will get tired of big brother beating up on little brother......just like growing up at home.......it was alway ok for 'little brother'(Ozen,Central) to beat up 'big brother'(WB), but when 'big brother'(WB) turned around and laid it on little brother(Ozen, Central)......... momma and daddy (BISD) get upset.....lol

WOW, it's like you were reading my mind!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Records and talent are out of the window in a rilvary....  It is time for the kids and the coaches to show who is the better program THIS year.  The kids at Central have something to prove so I am rooting for my Jags....  But a WB win won't surprise me!!!    Jaguar for life J.....  A..... G....... UARS!!  s :Ding the anthem!!!  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gimme a break.....you have nothing in response to that comment except to bring up the size of the school...is that the best you can do? but you are right...we shouldn't and we won't lose to a "4A" school, especially Central!. Hey, you started it!

Won't lose to a 4a team, huh?  Ok, if Central pulls it out, be on here to eat all the crow I decide to feed  you, ok?  ;) ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...