Jump to content

Who Wins Thursday's Game BC Or LC-M?


ESPN

Who Wins Friday Between BC & LC-M?  

  1. 1. Who Wins Friday Between BC & LC-M?



Recommended Posts

LCM hasn't seen a pitcher like Angelle, and will not see one till they get to Austin if they make it. BC hasn't seen a pitcher like Elhert, and will not till they play Lufkin Hudson, if they make it. Common opponents were Nederland, as Angelle and Elhert both pitched well, Angelle complete game victory, double digit K'a and 2 hits, Elhert 2 innings and I believe 1 hit no runs.

Next you have have Haymond and Womack, again common opponent Nederland, Haymond was still coming around from TJ, but he was rocked. Womack went 4 innings, 2 hits and no runs.

Both teams can put the ball in play. Elhert isn't the strike out pitcher like Angelle, so LCM's defense doesn't relax as say BC's when Angelle's on the hill. This IMO, is where LCM has the advantage, once Angelle leaves the mound, BC will have to play defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hummm??? what a game it is going to be. Ive seen both teams crush the ball against good pitching that of 85-88mph. So i dont know what is going to happen. Both teams have great talent and excellent pitchers. Both teams are on a hell of a win streak this should be a game to be remebered. I say BC wins only because i watched what they did to Jake Henderson from kelly at the beginning of the season looked like missiles flying everywhere. Not to say LCM cant hit the ball they have great bats it shows 30 home runs in a season thats impressive. It should be a close one depending on who pitches after the aces. BC Over Lcm 4-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen both teams play and personally I think this will be a very interesting, but very good game. In my opinion, LC-M overall is probably a slightly better team than BC. If Elhert and Angelle can pitch 5 innings i can see the score being 0-0 at that point. The key to me is LC-M bringing in a lefty to offset the lefty batters for BC. If LC-M brings in a righty I will give the edge to BC. BC may be a better hitting team, but LC-M has a better defense. One very important note. This may not be a playoff game, but the atmosphere will be as though it is. Casey Jackson will be another key factor. I think Casey is a very good baseball player, but he will have a lot of pressure holding down the catchers position in a playoff atmosphere. I have confidence that he can handle it, so let's wait and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MY Boys from LC-M will be crowned Kings of Orange county once my girlfriend quits singing :shock:

WOS has a short left field line and Le'Money (aka mini-Pujols) will be keeping it REAL!!!!

Angelle and co. must be having nightmares about pitching to that line-up, I mean who do you throw a strike to ? Im going out on a limb, but I bet BC coach wont let Angelle pitch very much, because these Bashing Bears will give him whiplash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • "Baytown Lee for a qb"? What does "for a qb" mean?
    • I can fire 5-6 rounds with a semi auto AR per second. That would empty a 30 round magazine in about 6 seconds. With an approximately (slow) 3 seconds to reload, that is about 180 rounds per minute…. with an over the counter semiautomatic rifle. According to Wikipedia the shooting last for 10 minutes. That is time to fire almost 2,000 in semiautomatic.  Would a true bump stock ban have prevented Vegas?  Would a lawful suppressor (with a $200 tax stamp) have done more selective damage before people started knowing what was happening? Remember that is a legal item.  With a semiautomatic rifle the Miami nightclub shooter killed 49 victims as opposed to 60 in Vegas. I guess 49 is  more acceptable than 60…..
    • Baytown Lee for a qb I heard… 
    • Shall not be infringed was not even an issue in this case.  The Supreme Court allowed and in fact didn’t even debate the ban on machine guns as being lawful.   The Supreme Court only looked at the law passed by Congress, accepted it as law and looked to see if bump stocks fit the legal definition as passed by Congress and signed by the president.  The easy answer was no, it did not and the ATF was making up their own definition which is unconstitutional.  In another comment you stated that bump stocks serve “no valuable purpose”. I agree but do we throw out the Constitution? We don’t need neo nazis  or klan members rhetoric either but are willing to pick and choose who gets free speech? I support the Supreme Court decision on an item that I don’t want even if you gave me one. I support it because it follows statutory law and the Constitution.  Do you suggest that the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution for political or dislike purposes? 
    • How would cracking down on crime prevented have what happened in Vegas?   The law of the land is no automatic weapons. If you get caught with a switch on your Glock, it’s a problem.  But you can legally modify your AR to get the same results? It’s a loophole that shouldn’t be there legally, and gun owners should boycott.    I love my AR. I believe everybody should get one. But there’s a big difference between a 30 round mag that’s fired semi-automatically, with at least the possibility of aiming at particular targets…. And a bump stop equipped AR that quite simply can’t be aimed. When the left argues that an AR serves no purpose, I disagree. But when some 2A nut is arguing that their fully automatic AR (by why of a bumpstock which renders the weapon useless in regards to accurate fire) is legal, I have to disagree, too.   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...