Jump to content

trades you would make for the Astros


Recommended Posts

Brad Lidge to BOS for prospects Bubba Bell recently called up to AA from high A and local Lumberton product Clay Buchholz.  Bell was hitting .370 with 22 HR and 10 SB in high A before his call up to Portland joining Buchholz who is 7-2 1.77 ERA as a starter with 116K in 86.2 IP in AA.  Bell has Houston ties as well before playing college ball at Nicholls State.  It's a deal you could realistically see Boston goign for since it only costs them 2 mid-level prospects both in AA right now, with Texas ties, who you could justify giving a September call up to to see what they have.  Boston is said to have interest in Lidge for a while and would provide additional back up should something happen to Papelbon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would call Atlanta first and see if you could get the Saltalamacchia kid from them.  Probably not, but he would instantly take over the catcher's position and solidify that for 4-5 years.

Other than that, I would start a bidding war between the Red Sox, Tigers and Indians and get as many prospects - of the highest quality - that I could. 

Of course, I don't trust Timmy P to do any of this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everybody around here would love to see Buch come back and pitch for the Astros. But there's NO WAY they give him up for lidge or anybody for that matter. He is the number one prospect in their farm system. he will be in their starting rotation probably next year. And they dont need lidge he cant start for them and they already have papelbon and okajima in case something happens to him what would they do with lidge?? Sure they wouldnt be opposed to adding a power arm but that price is way to steep for a pitcher as shown weakness is pressure moments and they will be deep in the playoffs and dont want a mid relief guy blowin it before u get to okajima and then papelbon Buch is stayin put in Bos for a long time to come hopefully all the way to cooperstown

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one trade to remember....  Larry Andersen to BOS for Jeff Bagwell when Bags was their #1 prospect as well and as damaged goods as Lidge is he is better then Andersen was at that time.  Not saying its likely to happen, but there always a chance.

good point denis very good point, we traded for baggy and he was a mainstay in houston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How often does that kind of history repeat though? I guess it would be worth a shot though considering Lidge has exactly 0 saves on the season. Former top 5 closer could get back to that level with a scenery change. It would be nice to get some more good prospects from Texas. Nice research whoever looked up those stats for those prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad Lidge to BOS for prospects Bubba Bell recently called up to AA from high A and local Lumberton product Clay Buchholz.  Bell was hitting .370 with 22 HR and 10 SB in high A before his call up to Portland joining Buchholz who is 7-2 1.77 ERA as a starter with 116K in 86.2 IP in AA.  Bell has Houston ties as well before playing college ball at Nicholls State.   It's a deal you could realistically see Boston goign for since it only costs them 2 mid-level prospects both in AA right now, with Texas ties, who you could justify giving a September call up to to see what they have.  Boston is said to have interest in Lidge for a while and would provide additional back up should something happen to Papelbon.

COME ON YOU CAN GIVE UP ON LIDGE YET, IF I WERE THE ASTROS I'D JUST SEE HOW HE DOES THE REST OF THE YEAR, HEY I KNOW HE'S HAD SOME PROBLEMS, BUT IF HE EVER GETS IT TOGETHER HE'LL BEIN NEXT YEARS ALL-STAR GAME... HE CAN GET UP TO 100 MPH, AND USED TO HAVE AN AWESOME SLIDER, (DONT KNWO WHAT HAPPENED)BUT IF THE ASTROS TRADED HIM, AND HE GOES SOMEWHERE, GETS HIS MENTAL GAME AND HIS MECHANINCS DOWN AND IS UNHITTABLE, I'D BET THEY'D REGRET IT FOR A LONG TIME.... BUT IF HE STINKS FOR THE REST OF THE YEAR ID GET RID OF HIM IN THE OFF-SEASON ;D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't just get rid of him in the offseason - you get nothing in return for him.  Then, if you don't offer him arbitration you lose a draft pick.  If he comes back after arbitration and he is still not right, you're paying probably 6-7 million dollars a year for a set up guy?

They need to trade him and get as much young talent as possible so they can fix this thing without breaking the bank on high priced free agent acquisitions.

No one said that making trades wasn't easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no offense denis, but your nuts! no one in major league baseball wants to put there hands on brad "blow another game" lidge. ESPECIALLY for clay buchholz, he is the NUMBER 1 prospect in the entire red sox organization. he will probably be the number 3 starter in their rotation next year. he's one of the best pitchers in minor league baseball, no one's giving that up. sure, i'd LOVE to see buchholz come to houston, but it WILL never happen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...