Jump to content

What are your Top-5 rivalry games that you have attended?


Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Nah.... that was a really heated game.  Long story behind that one.  BC got taken to the woodshed.  

 

My personal favorite was Silsbee at BC the same year.  Silsbee had Calvin Tyler, Jr and BC pulled out the win to seal District.  

Is that the same year yall had that track star who played football? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know MCM get the majority of the recognition in this are, even state wide, but Jasper vs Silsbee should be on any local lists. PN-G vs Nederland is a 100 year rivalry this coming season. The 100th meeting between them starting in 1925. The thing about this rivalry is that these kids play together in Babe  Ruth, back yard baseball, football, and most have family in both cities. They may have hate for each other for a week or tw, but the rest of the time the cross community support for each other is very large. When you look at Silsbee vs Jasper their isn't a single ounce of love lost between these two schools. I would put their rivalry up there with PNG and Nederland. I wish it got more of the recognition it deserves. Jasper vs Silsbee started 3 years earlier than PNG vs Nederland in 1922. They have played 79 times. The record between the two is 45-31-2 in Jaspers favor. I would rank this as the second best rivalry in SETX sports coverage area. Its a shame it get overshadowed, it deserves more attention. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I’d be mad if you were lying. 

I remember maybe 1990 or 1991, Silsbee came to BC on a Friday night and it was a hell of a game. BC had 2 real good running backs. Silsbee won by 4 i think. Could have been Doss,Dill, and Arline in Silsbee backfield then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,935
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Actually I wasn’t responding to your comment. It was funny. I was using your comment to take issue with baddog’s comparison. 😎
    • I mean the baseball kids aren’t even doing football after school, they go to baseball… baseball kids get about a hour during the period. 
    • That is yet to be determined in trial. ”Taking” in the Fifth Amendment doesn’t mean ownership, title changing hands, etc. A government can “take” your property without “taking” your properties.  That has been true.  This issue is, did Texas take the property under the Fifth Amendment and subsequent Supreme Court rulings and not the dictionary definition of “taking”. As always in the law, definitions matter. 
    • Wrong again. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   The day that Trump took office, our nation debt stood at 19.9 Trillion dollars (End of Q4, 2016).  After his tax cuts (without corresponding cuts in spending), the national debt stood at 23.2 Trillion dollars at the end of Q1 of 2020 that was the Start of COVID, FYI... Or a total increase in debt of almost 17% during Trump's first three years (and one quarter) in office.  At the end of his reign (with COVID spending for which Trump himself signed off on) was at 27.7 Trillion Dollars.  That's a 39% increase in the National Debt while Trump was in office.  For further reference, Biden inherited a 27.7 Trillion dollar debt to start.  At the end of Q4 2023, the debt stands at 34 Trillion.  That's an increase of 19% over the first three years. I know that math and facts hurt your feelings, but Trump was horrible for the country before he allowed "them Dirty Democrats to shut down the economy."  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the country" doesn't know the first thing about micro/macro economics or the effects of deficit spending.  Trump hurt us like no other president, period.  Anybody that says "Trump was good for the economy" is actually stating for the rest of us with some sense "I don't know what I'm talking about."
    • But of course you wouldn’t understand the saying. You’re so clever. Your education precedes you. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...