Jump to content

Jessie Haynes....I bet this gets good

thetragichippy

By thetragichippy
in The Locker Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted

Hmmm? I'm still on patrol and I'm watching you people very closely.

 

 

Translation:  Workers comp fraud is only acceptable if it is filed against certain segments of society while other segments are off limits.  Dove, are the RC police accountable to anyone or can they move freely about and make whatever inferences/ accusations they wish with no repercussions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CGull8
CGull8

I don't believe this should have tied up our court system. But since it did, I think they should have sentenced her for 6 hours in jail and then have a guard block the door refusing to let her out.

Bigcam2903
Bigcam2903

I see we have the anticipated delays put in motion by BISD. The District really thinks TEA won't take over. Is this case a Slam Dunk for TEA?? I really think the District's goose is cooked. Haynes is

mat
mat

Day three for a misdemeanor trial?   Looks like the police chief may be in bigger trouble than Haynes is.

Posted Images

BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted

Watch all you want.  She has no business working for any school district.

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

 

Shouldn't you be a good communicator to be in charge of communications?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigdog

Bigdog

Posted
Posted

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

 

What duties?  Trying to protect her bosses (the Super and majority voting block board members) from media reports that they didn't want to get out? (but did anyway).  Or the fact that she drummed up false accusations so she could sit on her butt for a year and still collect her pay?  Or her duty to block one of voting minority board members and her boss ( but she would never admit that )  from entering a meeting again because he doesn't agree with what the Super and the rest of the board is doing?  Should I go on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

She does seem a little........overpaid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

Dove, the answer is always race, right?  Was the guy who embezzled 4 million mistreated because of his race?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthoftheBorder

NorthoftheBorder

Posted
Posted

So, you would prefer she get on the unemployment line for the next two years? Are you going to monitor her job seeking responsibilities? No-ooooo, but you want that woman fired, and for what? A misdemeanor that has no affect on her job duties? Or maybe there are deeper issues here. Are you really upset because of her salary?

I think she lacks the maturity to be in a responsible position in a public school district where education and the development of youth (including setting the proper example) is needed and necessary!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

Day three for a misdemeanor trial?

 

Looks like the police chief may be in bigger trouble than Haynes is.

 

Probably not. He will simply fire the officer and deny everything like his mentor (and maybe more), Haynes. 

 

It will all come down to a he said/she said ..... unless the officer was smart enough to record the incidents after the first occurrence..... assuming it happened.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,942
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    mmj0
    Newest Member
    mmj0
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...