Jump to content

Jessie Haynes....I bet this gets good

thetragichippy

By thetragichippy
in The Locker Room

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bigcam2903

Bigcam2903

Posted
Posted

Cam, I was on a jury a couple months back and the jury was made up of 7 whites, 2 hisp and 3 blacks. The defendant was black and we came to a unanomous not guilty. No racism!! And if you think real hard you'll know what trial it was because it was a high profile case.

 

All Hope isn't lost,  you bring up a good point. I pray the Jury would close their eyes, look at the facts and render a fair & just verdict.

PNG, I've served on a few & witnessed a few & all were ridiculous. Your Jury pool obviously studied the facts & left the Outside stuff outside.

If not talked about with an open mind and compassion, Race relations will continue to be a problem. It can't be one sided for any Race of people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 165
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CGull8
CGull8

I don't believe this should have tied up our court system. But since it did, I think they should have sentenced her for 6 hours in jail and then have a guard block the door refusing to let her out.

Bigcam2903
Bigcam2903

I see we have the anticipated delays put in motion by BISD. The District really thinks TEA won't take over. Is this case a Slam Dunk for TEA?? I really think the District's goose is cooked. Haynes is

mat
mat

Day three for a misdemeanor trial?   Looks like the police chief may be in bigger trouble than Haynes is.

Posted Images

tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

Question- since this is a six person jury, does the vote have to be unanimous to convict ?

 

.... as westend said and also to acquit. It has to be unanimous one way or the other or a mistrial will be declared. The defendant can be brought to trial again on the same charges at the discretion of the DA because a mistrial does not count against double jeopardy. 

 

Locally I have seen mistrials tried a second time and if no conviction on the second attempt, the case is dropped as there simply is not the likelihood of enough evidence to convict. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BLUEDOVE3

BLUEDOVE3

Posted
Posted

All Hope isn't lost,  you bring up a good point. I pray the Jury would close their eyes, look at the facts and render a fair & just verdict.

PNG, I've served on a few & witnessed a few & all were ridiculous. Your Jury pool obviously studied the facts & left the Outside stuff outside.

If not talked about with an open mind and compassion, Race relations will continue to be a problem. It can't be one sided for any Race of people.

hell naw, I'm still waiting on my forty acres, and da man can keep the mule!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

OK....back to subject.....Shouldn't this be a simple case? She is on trial for obstructing a door.....right?  She clearly did do that. right?

 

As for if she was assaulted, does that really matter?

 

If I'm caught shoplifting and someone assaults me, does the shoplifting charge go away?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigcam2903

Bigcam2903

Posted
Posted
All I want to know why are we having a trial in the First Place?? Assault, please. Give her a Fine & let's move on. We have far bigger issues. I'm sick of hearing the same lame excuses from the 2 board members that they aren't Ever in the know. It would seem with this widespread misappropriation that these two would definitely keep a very close eye on District dealings. One of them was caught doing the very thing he's Blasting the District for doing. I don't see him in the News. Their All involved in some fashion. Just some things they weren't down with. SMH
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All I want to know why are we having a trial in the First Place?? Assault, please. Give her a Fine & let's move on. We have far bigger issues. I'm sick of hearing the same lame excuses from the 2 board members that they aren't Ever in the know. It would seem with this widespread misappropriation that these two would definitely keep a very close eye on District dealings. One of them was caught doing the very thing he's Blasting the District for doing. I don't see him in the News. Their All involved in some fashion. Just some things they weren't down with. SMH

 

Who you talking about Bigcam?

 

The reason they are having a trial is they(public) want her gone....

 

Not sure about what you do, but in my job, if I started singing during a public meeting, I would get fired. If I blocked a doorway (for whatever reason)....I would get fired.....if I falsified a police report claiming something happened at my job that didn't, I would be fired....... 

 

But she is still there :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted

All I want to know why are we having a trial in the First Place?? Assault, please. Give her a Fine & let's move on. We have far bigger issues.............. 

 

Why is there a trial in the place? Well, we have a person that on camera appears to have broken state law that says you cannot block access to a door or passageway. 

 

The DA reviewed the video evidence and obviously saw what everyone else should have and that is that Haynes blocked a person from entering where the person had the right to be. 

 

Why not give her a fine and move on? It appears that the DA tried to do just that and she would not accept it. Part of it was deferred adjudication meaning that if he does her six months on probation, the charge goes away like it didn't happen. I agree that they should move on but apparently she wants to pay more for a lawyer than she will save in probation fees and fine and then hope for jury nullification where they ignore the video and go with politics. 

 

Also, the "bigger" issues as you are referring to probably deal with the school district. This particular county court deals with these kinds of cases every day and has nothing to do with any other government function or issues. The court will have a misdemeanor trial today whether it is Haynes or someone else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigcam2903

Bigcam2903

Posted
Posted

Why is there a trial in the place? Well, we have a person that on camera appears to have broken state law that says you cannot block access to a door or passageway.

The DA reviewed the video evidence and obviously saw what everyone else should have and that is that Haynes blocked a person from entering where the person had the right to be.

Why not give her a fine and move on? It appears that the DA tried to do just that and she would not accept it. Part of it was deferred adjudication meaning that if he does her six months on probation, the charge goes away like it didn't happen. I agree that they should move on but apparently she wants to pay more for a lawyer than she will save in probation fees and fine and then hope for jury nullification where they ignore the video and go with politics.

Also, the "bigger" issues as you are referring to probably deal with the school district. This particular county court deals with these kinds of cases every day and has nothing to do with any other government function or issues. The court will have a misdemeanor trial today whether it is Haynes or someone else.


I agree with all you wrote and the Evidence is there. This is so petty & pathetic. With all the ignorance going on, Man the doors with Officers since the Adults act like children. Any violations gets you a night in Jail & a hefty Fine.
I've read she refused probation, didn't understand why. If what you sY is True she needs another Lawyer. SMH
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I agree with all you wrote and the Evidence is there. This is so petty & pathetic. With all the ignorance going on, Man the doors with Officers since the Adults act like children. Any violations gets you a night in Jail & a hefty Fine.
I've read she refused probation, didn't understand why. If what you sY is True she needs another Lawyer. SMH

 

She has a plan......not sure what, but she has to have a plan...No way she turns down a plea deal AND an opportunity to stay out of the spot light......unless she is up to something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNGFan

PNGFan

Posted
Posted

All I want to know why are we having a trial in the First Place?? Assault, please. Give her a Fine & let's move on. We have far bigger issues. I'm sick of hearing the same lame excuses from the 2 board members that they aren't Ever in the know. It would seem with this widespread misappropriation that these two would definitely keep a very close eye on District dealings. One of them was caught doing the very thing he's Blasting the District for doing. I don't see him in the News. Their All involved in some fashion. Just some things they weren't down with. SMH


It wasn't assault. If anything need to charge her with Workers Comp Fraud!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,944
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...