gary-us-bonds

Lee ball starting at 25 again. Int angleton Lee on 25 again Inc pass Inc pass Inc pass Angleton on offense mow

2nd offense in. Run for 4 Inc pass Pass interference on defense but they still are not marking off penalties Lee ball on 25 Run for zero Pass for zero and facemask Angleton more ready for a street fight than to playball

Lee with one long pass then three plays for seven yards. Startin over at the 20 Now a three and out. Starting over at the 25. Run right for minus 3 Sacked for minus 5 Pass for minus 3 more

Lee jv 2 angleton jv 2

#42 for lee jv must be a transfer that just showed up yesterday.  Looks like Bernard pollard out there. Way too good for jv

Punt return d nt working quite as well with jv. Lee has one td and another where the rb was five yards behind everyone and somehow fumbled without being touched.  Now lee just throws a go route and get an interference call.  This defense just puts way too much pressure on the corners. Gotta have four champ baileys out there

Angleton freshmen three lee zero final

Lee has about 42 it appears.  Lee figured out the punt block defense a little bit that time with some passes in the flat. For some reason they called an interference penalty on angleton but didn't mark it off.  I'm not sure if this is angletons normal defense?  If so they can expect to give up a tin of big plays once teams get their timing down on offense as the season progresses.

Angleton twos with another td after about an eight play drive

Angleton marches down and scores in about ten plays. Lee looks like they would rather play two below.

Lee freshman just ran about20 plays for negative 20 yards.  Angleton playing what I like to call the punt block defense on John madden

Lee does not have a whole lot of size. I think if anything lee and angleton may have similar traits. Lot of small, quick guys and not much size

Pasadena Memorial is always a tough, hard-nosed football team.  I would imagine they will be able to smash mouth the ball on BH a little bit. It should be a good test for BH.

Exactly Gasilla. FW fans are a little too defensive. The thing you have to remember about high school football teams is that they are going to have multiple busted assignments throughout a game.  NFL teams have them, college teams have more than the NFL, and high school teams have even more than college.  This goes for the very best executing teams out there like LT.  LT will have plenty of busted assignments throughout a game.  They are good enough to still win the games though. Knowing that, you now have to consider the result of the busted assignment.  If you are playing a typical team, you may bust an assignment and give up 20 yards.  If you play WOS and a guy misses an assignment then they have two or three receivers that no one on FW can catch. I guess I'm saying that WOS has a puncher's chance.  They have a lot of speed in the defensive backfield.  I could see them picking off a ball or two and possibly running one back for a td.  I could see them getting a punt or kick return for a td.  I could see them getting a long pass play or two for a td. When you have that kind of speed, you always have a chance.

OK, I could say that I have seen it with my own eyes, but then that would be too subjective. How else am I supposed to argue my point?  I tried to provide empirical evidence to the best of my ability. I would just assume that everyone knows and understands that WOS is faster than FW, but I guess that's not as much of a given as it should be.

Of course WOS is faster than LT. I never claimed that speed was all it took to win football games.  I was merely replying to one small quote in the thread.  WOS may have trouble with FW's size and execution, but WOS can run circles around FW in the speed department. [url=[Hidden Content] 2010 state champs[/url] [quote]The West Orange-Stark boys smiled broadly, clearly enjoying the moment. The Mustangs stood atop a podium and posed for pictures, more pictures and even more pictures. It took more than five minutes to pry the group from the award stand Saturday afternoon. But they had good reason to savor the moment. For the second year in a row, the Mustangs won the Class 3A state track and field title. "It's extremely hard to win a state championship, especially back to back," said WO-S coach Toby Foreman, whose team won its first state track title in school history last season. "The weather conditions weren't the best. So for these guys to come out and still compete to the best of their ability and win is amazing. They all did a great job."[/quote]

I guess we will find out pretty quick here this year if the Ganders have anything at all or if it will be a long season. I would almost prefer to play Deer Park like in the past few years. lol Quandre Diggs might have the ability to make Lee look really bad all by himself. I will be out there though, and I will try to provide some updates.

I'm not a WOS fan.

[url=[Hidden Content] cougars looking strong[/url] [quote]“I think this team is more dedicated, and harder working,” Merka said. “It seems like we click a little better coming into this season. The program is getting better and better every year so the expectations are rising, so the players are stepping up more.  “There’s a lot expected of me, and I’ve got high hopes for me leading this team also,” he said. “I guess we’re just taking things one step at a time, getting everybody prepared every week and trying to get a W every week, win district and make a playoff run. That’s what it’s all about.”[/quote]

No, I'm not profiling. I've yet to see a Friendswood team yet that had any sort of speed on it. They do it with coaching and execution and size. If they had speed too, then we would have been talking about 3 or 4 state championships by now.

Again, you're creating an argument that doesn't exist. No one said that speed was going to make WOS beat FW. The point I made was a single, solitary point. WOS can run circles around FW in the speed dept.  I never claimed that one should infer anything from that fact.

[quote name="fwstangs" post="825450" timestamp="1281823049"] [quote author=panamamyers link=topic=71184.msg825381#msg825381 date=1281803330] WOS has light years better speed than Friendswood. You could take the 22 fastest players to ever play at Friendswood in their entire history and you might be able to compare to what WOS has every single year. [/quote] Kinda like that Beaumont Central speed? We know how that worked out. You wanna talk speed son, go watch Angleton - they make yall look very very average. [/quote] You're shifting the argument to a different topic now. You were earlier trying to say something about a big, fast team.  FW may be bigger, but WOS is much, much faster. Never said WOS was better, but FW has no where near the speed that WOS has.

[quote name="bh89-2" post="825969" timestamp="1281969295"] OK, since everyone is so confident and because we have to drag LEE into this, here is a little wager for fun: Panamamyers (LEE) GCMPats (GCM) Litltex (Dayton) Bronco1 (Dayton) BHFan (BH) Anyone else who is not scared or anyone wants to drag into this. Whomever is the last team standing, the names listed above will purchase and wear a shirt in support of that team during the next playoff game after their team is out. If any team listed above makes it to state, we all go together and wear that team's shirt. Of course we have to have a picture for here.   ;D [/quote] I'll let you know after I watch Lee play Angleton ;D

I figure GCM is going to have a stout defense.  You have to consider they had mostly sophomores and juniors last year.  What do they have, 9 starters back on defense? This from a defense that was rounding into form at the end of the season. I'm just not sure about the offense, particularly with Jacobs focusing on baseball.  He had to be the leading contender to take over the qb position. I'm not sure where LCM is all of the sudden the odds on favorite to beat GCM.

[quote name="cbear4" post="825780" timestamp="1281900230"] I will not predict any score as I have only seen LCM in one 7 on 7 tournament. They do have some good athletes but I do not see them matching up with virtually the whole defense that held Central to 7 points in last year's playoff game. We'll see how they do in week 0. Good luck to both schools. As far as Cy Springs rushing attack, they had some early success running the ball but 75 yards rushing in 42 minutes of total play does not indicate success running the football. They had plenty of talent but just looked like they were still looking at filling out positions lost from last year. [/quote] That is mis-representing what was said in the paper.  The 75 yards was in the first 20 minutes.