tvc184

This is about right in line with my opinion. As far as recruiting, they won't have to actively recruit per se. If a school gets a reputation of turning out scholarships to D1 schools, how much recruiting will be needed? They will be able to pick and choose their starters to some extent.

I've done well with small spinners like you said and also top water swimmers like small original Rapalas.

If it's done fairly quickly.

If LCM can make the playoffs or even a strong run at it, they would definitely qualify as a sleeper.

No need to read four pages of posts to figure this one out. When people talk about a sport being king, they are talking about popularity. Who won the most games, against whom or who has been to the playoffs or championship game the most times means absolutely nothing when discussing which sport is king. Football in most schools can draw a bigger crowd on one game than they can the entire home basketball season. While there are a couple of basketball schools where that isn't true, even there the football will normally outdraw basketball in the mere five home football games and by a wide margin. High school football is clearly the king in southeast Texas (or all of Texas for that matter) and basketball is an also-ran.

The one on the south end used to hold a lot of reds. I have caught many over the years in the 10-20 pound range. I have not fished there in the last few years however and don't know if the dredging has hurt that area.

I put in my vote already.

Keepers? All solid fish in the 16-20 inch range. Yep.... those'll eat.

Keepers?

From my opinion, if it is a setxsports.com tournament, there needs to be at least one member of the forum in the boat. I don't see this as a big deal tournament but a gathering of a few of the posters on this forum for friendship purposes and meet our friends and antagonists. For that reason, I don't see a reason to invite members of the public at large. Maybe I'm wrong................ Anyone else?

Here you go. The 5th Circuit (our federal district) ruled that a moment of silence for prayer was constitutional since it did not require someone to pray but allowed them to pray. [Hidden Content]

Offending someone has nothing to do with the laws. You can offend someone to your heart's content or at least if you do so without making threats or use fighting words. You also have the right to pray when and where you please..... kind of. The last one that kills you is interesting. You are making the argument based on the Constitution yet you can't believe that laws you benefit a minority. That is the reason we are not a democracy but have a constitution that a democracy cannot override or at least not without amending the Constitution.

Yeah. Let's get completely different rulings every 4 years. The lifetime terms keep as much politics as possible out of it. If you think that you don't like rulings now, wait till the change them out with no consistency. The legal rulings caught up with the Constitution. Democracy does not rule in this country and it was never intended to. It is a constitutional republic. If it was a democracy alone then majority would always rules. That means no rights at all... since they could simply be voted out by the majority. I guess blacks with only 12% of this country's population would be out of luck if the rest of us decide that they no longer have rights. It might be universal in the Christian religions. I guess the Jews, Muslims and others are just out of luck. Actually it appears as though you don't want anyone to have rights except Christians. I do too. They don't carry more weight. They simply have the law on their side for their grievances. I don't like the complaints either but I don't have to agree with the law.

Actually where he was fishing, you could probably see down a long way, almost like it was tap water. I don't know if that makes anyone feel any better but the water there can be crystal clear.

Yep... I don't care where I fish as long as I am fishing.

I think you hit the nail on the head.

On the other hand, I just bought me a brand new 8 wt flyrod on Saturday at Bass Pro Shop in Pearland. Looks like a great bass outfit. Y'all might be in trouble if I can find a boat to fish out of. We had a company spring bass tournament about 20 years ago at Six Mile on Toledo (last bass tourney that I fished). I showed up with my partner and we had a couple of spinning and casting rods in the boat but we also had about half a dozen flyrods. Naturally we got a few snickers and teehees as we pulled away in our 16 foot flatbottom aluminum boat. The snickers weren't quite to prevalent when we won the tournament. I think we weight in 9 fish (out of 10 possible) and 7 of them came off of the flyrods including our biggest.

Freshwater does have that appeal for many people whoever....... Saltwater is much closer for most people in the Golden Triangle, it can be done from many places on the bank for people without a boat and it can be done for more than one fish. I know the tournament will be in freshwater, I am just sayin'.................

Find a new wreck. ;D The flounder are still there, you just need another spot.

Therein lies the problem. Most people are making this an endorsement or criticism of the Christian religion. I am wondering if the coach wanted to throw a mat down and turn toward Mecca and start praying in Arabic if they would feel the same way.

From your previous post, that is not a term of his employment. For this post, it doesn't matter. They still have the right to set rules in the workplace. Their policy does not prohibit religion or praying. The coach can take his normal breaks and pray to his heart's content. Look, I know that I will never convince you of this court ruling. Well this Supreme Court is very conservative right now in the five person majority. They could not even get enough votes to bring it in from of the entire Court for a ruling. They applied the law as it has been in the past. As far as the Supreme Court's right to do so.... that is in the same Constitution that you claim has been violated. Well that very document says that the Supreme Court, when a dispute exists over the law, is the body that rules if the law is legal pursuant to the Constitution. That body has ruled and allowed the lower court to stand. You post stuff about the EEOC rules. If it is so clear, how come several courts have ruled against your opinion? If you don't like it, great. There are rulings that I don't like either. That doesn't make them wrong or unlawful.

You bet... and in this case it wasn't. I did not say that I agree with your opinion. An employer can ban you from doing things that the Constitution guarantees to be free from "government" restrictions. This very sports forum is a fine example of people misconception of "rights". We all know that there is freedom of speech. That means that the govenment cannot restrict political speech but all speech is not free. This site through the owners can and do set any rules that they wish. They can and do modify or delete posts without the consent of the person making the post. They can ban users and/or delete their accounts. Freedom of speech has nothing to do with a private enterprise. It is that way with all of the amendments. There is nothing in the Constitution, the amendments or court rulings that said all rights are complete with no restrictions or at each person's discretion. What it amounts to is this case is about religion and so it offends a lot of people. There is nothing that prohibits this guy from praying. The school apparently has a rule about overt public displays of any kind. As I have said, I disagree with that attitude but that doesn't mean that the district cannot do it. People are taking an argument over the law and trying to make it an argument about the endorsement of religion. If it was many of the other rights that we were discussing, a lot of the opinions would be different or many people simply wouldn't care. Mention religion and you would have thought the school district demanded that the coach sign a document saying that God did not exist or that Jesus Christ is not the Savior.

And that has absolutely nothing to do with this case. The coach wasn't prohibited from being hired due to religion. He wasn't fired because he was a Christian. He isn't required to pray as a condition of his employment.

Since you have it highlighted, did the US Congress prohibit this guy from kneeling ..... or was it his employer?

: : I guess that you are at least somewhat correct. Rights cannot be violated.. and in this case they are not. Restrictions can be placed on conduct though. Just because someone doesn't like a ruling, that doesn't mean that any civil right is violated. The Constitution gives no complete freedom of speech, no complete freedom of religion, no complete freedom of the press, no complete right to bear arms, no complete right to no searches without warrants, etc. But I am sure that you learned that in Constitutional Law class.