team first

Stevie went to oakhill cause that was his only chance to possible get his sat, and credit high enough to get in d1 college!!!!!

Coaches still make the final decisions, but I believe this is a little different than cake and ice cream. Not really a good comparison. The Ned, kids where given a choice and everyone voted to play for out right champs. I believe English is a pretty darn good coach. By him asking his kids, does that mean he offers em ice cream before games? U are killing me

I bet if u asked the central kids what they wanted, they would have choose to play.

Not if they both would have agreed to play it for the district championship. Of course that's only what the district policy says. Now the game could have been played just for seedings, if one team choose not to play if for out right district champs. Ned wanted to play for out right district champs.

If they would have both agreed to play for the outright district championship, then it wouldn't have been co. Both coaches would have had to agree to this. Nederland wanted to play for out right champs

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1179808" timestamp="1329486041"] There is a bigger picture than a district win. To some teams who are use to winning at a certain level, they are more focused on the NEXT LEVEL. In this case, regional and Austin. [/quote] Just worry about moving up to 2nd in district, before u talk about regionals. Heck just worry about winning all jv district games, before regionals.

Spin it however I want??? I an just stating 20-4a district rules. If I was coaching a team silsbee, hj, Ned, central, I would be playing all day. How could  I look my kids in the eye and say I think is better to concede. I couldn't do it.

If both coaches agree that the game is for the district Champ, then it could be played as the district championship game. But since both are not agreeing to play it that way, it is only for seeding purposes only. With both being Co-district champions.

100 people in the marching band, 1 out of step, yet it's the other 99 Band members fault.

Obviously by dawgs last post they did. Congrats bluedove on ur first big win.

Did ozen jv win tonight?

Need to show em something after that last beat down

Yes theres a new ad, but cross was hired in 09, before the new ad. And won rt away

Everybody needs to remember this is the same Dickie that said winning at lamar pa would never happen as long as Bill W was there. Of course one new coach and a year later, we all know hiw good lamar pa has done. So people need not worry to much about his judgement of coaching talent.

[quote name="BLUEDOVE3" post="1167611" timestamp="1327805933"] [quote author=Rizon link=topic=95013.msg1167606#msg1167606 date=1327805156] Don't most colleges lift all year around? [/quote]And a lot of high schools. Makes a difference when you have some strength ;) [/quote] No most Colleges Don't lift year round, during season usually once a week, to maintain.

And wasn't meaning to disrespect what Boutte did in 07, calling it a great job. Awesome job it is

Not a betting man, I work to hard for my money. But no one can convince me other wise that ozen had way more talent than vidor. And there was only one ot game. Vidor lost 3 games in district, and ozen lost 2. All I know is when they faced each other with close talent, English won all 3

What Boutte did is 07, was a great job. Now back to 04, ozen was easily the better team in my opinion. George w was never going to byu, byu so him one game and said thanks but No thanks , Jake m, went d11, d1 told him tks but no tks. Ozen Ballard played at st marys, peanut b, played Lamar pa, same as George, and then Joe lamb went juco. So to say vidor was better, one could easily look at lay-ups lines to see who had more talent. And central only beat vidor once that year. Equal talent english will x and o Boutte to death

The real question is who would win with equal talent? IMO English. His vidor team was not as good as Boutte ozen team, the year English swept him 3-0

[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="1165932" timestamp="1327525958"] There was no question at all that with that amount of time left (and with the previous continueation 3 point shot that was waived off by officials) that Kristain was going to shoot that 3.  Ozen should have just played good defense and lived with the outcome of a contested 3. [/quote] I agree just play good d and if he makes the 3, good shoot

Dickie on the central ozen game, where they trying to foul to send them to shoot 2 at the free-throw line, and just got caught fouling while he was shooting a three? Or where they just going to guard and play it out? That's the old discussion of to foul or not to foul

Wow some are touchy touchy. Truth gets to some more than others

As soon as ur best players goes down with a season ending injury, I bet most want play many starters again with a big lead late in the game

At least they are winning now blue, you have yet to be at a high school program thats a winner. And no coming in 3rd or 4th in district does not make you a winner. Maybe next year a new school??? Or just beat Ned in a district jv game, heck that should be easy (since they dominate summer ball ) which is the best rt. A jv lose c'mon man

Makes Perfect sense You make it sound like its rocket science. How did we ever learn how to add in the 3 point shot. I know I know, but you have to know when to start it, and when not to. Can you imagine all the book work and class work it's going take. Cmon man