Englebert

I find it odd and disconcerting that you think stereotyping is wrong but you yourself engage in this practice on a regular basis.

Hillary's biggest problem is she just doesn't know how to deliver a speech full of false hope and empty promises. She can say the words, but she can't sell the false narrative like Obama or Bill. She's just too transparent...thus the distrust.

If this absurd statement has any semblance of truth, why wasn't our credit rating lowered when Bill shut down the government...twice? Don't answer. I don't think I can handle the Mensa-like statement forthcoming.

I'm surprised she was quoting from that show. After all, it portrays a wall, and Liberals hate walls.

Are you actually trying to call most people on this site stupid? This coming after you clearly demonstrated (on several occasions) that you don't even know the difference between deficit and debt. Us stupid people have no problem clearly seeing who you are.

Such an imaginative and thoughtful response. Did you lift this from one of your many far-left "news" outlets or was you just watching a re-run of A Few Good Men?

It actually took you this long to read the Liberal talking points before formulating this opinion? Liberals were trying to push this hilarious idea all day yesterday. One congressman actually tried to say Trumps comments were tantamount to treason. Liberals sure know how to show selective outrage. It makes for good comedy routines until we realize that many sheeple actually believe them. I wish Liberals would have shown just a tiny fraction of this fake outrage when they found out Hillary was hiding a server in her basement that held classified information.

Sounds to me like he just reads the Liberal talking points for the day and regurgitates them on here.

Do you really think anybody gives any credence to such false stereotypes you are trying to portray? But more importantly, do you feel like you bolstered you perceived intelligence level with your audience when you make these types of statements?

What in the world are you trying to say? Nevermind. Reply tomorrow when you're sober.

Who's speaking? I turned it off. Edit: Nevermind. Lost my buffer to turn it back on. I'm already back to Seinfeld re-runs.

Yeah, he's generous to the tune of $20 trillion dollars of debt. If that's your definition of generosity, then please, let's start drawing up the secession papers. Liberals are always generous with other people's money. That is an odd quote in the context of this topic. Did you even read or understand my post, or did you just want to try to insert an irrelevant jab instead of adding anything to the discussion.

I can't watch this train wreck anymore. Some lady Democrat (I didn't catch her name) congressman just said that Trump's comments today are paramount to treason. Let's see, Hillary hiding an unsecure email server that has classified emails running through it doesn't qualify as a security breach, but Trump asking the Russians to hand over the 30,000 emails Hillary illegally deleted constitutes treason on his part. We've just identified another nutjob congressman. I'm going back to watching Seinfeld re-runs.

Sorry, I try to avoid personal attacks, but it is clear you are not intelligent enough for this discussion. Try taking a basic high school economics course then get back with me.

I and others have repeatedly asked him to provide proof of Trump's racist remarks. He can't do it. But he still tries to claim Trump is a racist. The Left will try to paint Louis Farrakhan as a racist if he put a "R" behind his name. new tobie is just repeating the lies put out by the Democrats. TxHoops is the only one that has provided what could possibly be some evidence. The page would not let me scroll so I couldn't read the article. It was from the Huffington Post so the validity is highly questionable. The statement (I could only read the first paragraph) was from a long time ago and probably hear-say. I'm sure if evidence exists the New York Times would have already published it. But as long as the Democrats keep trying to push the narrative, new tobie will keep pushing it on here, regardless of lack of evidence.

One that tried to prosecute without the ability to prove intent and one that chose to not prosecute but could show intent.

We might have to build a wall around the whole state to keep those left behind out. That could be costly.

I'm sure they will mention it. Although LumRaiderFan provided you some links from like-minded sources, I applaud you for waiting for the "real" no-spin stories.

I highly doubt that. In fact, I don't think we (Texas) would be able to secede without a bunch of other states wanting to secede with us.

When Lois Lerner and her staff were debating whether or not to go after Willie, I'm sure the conversation went something like this: Staffer 1: We need to go after Willie Nelson because he is an angry old white guy. He must be Republican. Staffer 2: Well, I don't know. He is a musician and in the entertainment industry. He must be a Democrat. Staffer 3: He's from Texas so he must be an angry old white racist. All of the staff in unison: Agreed! Lois Lerner: Then it's settled. Go after him.

That still doesn't make us any less in debt. A quick reminder: $20 trillion dollars worth

Debt. Not deficit. Debt. Like in $20 trillion dollars worth. Do you even know the difference between the two? I can explain it but a simple Bing search should give you the answers. And anyone that has a household budget should be knowledgeable of both terms.

I don't take anything from this website seriously. In fact, like this link, the only thing I've ever seen from this website are links someone sent me...just to make fun of. But man I hope this one is true...and serious. [Hidden Content]

I'm sure many on the Left won't believe this since you linked to Fox News. They will have to wait until the story comes out on Huffington Post, New York Times, Mother Jones, or one of their more "reputable" sources.