Englebert

So where is the lie in your link. Rush is spot on. Are you really trying to suggest that Liberals don't use any type of abnormal weather to promote their Man-Made Global Warming lie? And I've noticed you run as far and fast as you can from any debate on Man-Made Global Warming. But I'll try again. Show me any shred of evidence that global warming is catastrophic and is caused by man. I have more confidence in a no-answer than Obama thinks scientists agree on the subject. Bye. I will disagree with Rush on one point. He said no major hurricane has hit the U.S. in 11 years. Hurricane Ike hit us (me personally) in 2008. And I'll fix your question for you: Who is the bigger pos, Obama or Hillary?

I see you decided to end your self-imposed forum strike. I think Al Sharpton lasted longer on his hunger strike. And in typical Liberal fashion, you can't name policy issues, you can only lob tasteless personal attacks. I guess you now feel like a internet tough guy for those assertions.

Was this your feeble attempt at a response? Or your feeble attempt to deflect? I'll wait for Big girl to give a more cogent response. (How does it feel for someone to request an intelligent response from Big girl over you? That has to be a devastating feeling.)

Had to quote you again to make sure you get the notification. Big girl, why are you all over other threads questioning the intelligence of posters, but you conveniently refuse to respond to this one? Did one of your many Liberal rag websites fail to give you an answer? Please take a stab at it using your own intelligence. I'm anxiously awaiting your enlightened response. And please refrain from insulting the intelligence of any poster on this board until you can respond to this post. It doesn't have to be a college level answer. It doesn't have to be a 6th grade level answer. Just buck up and try to muster the best you have to offer?

Release your tax returns so we can see how much you pay for health insurance. Or do you have something to hide? Why won't you show us your tax returns?

So do it. Or maybe you do have something to hide. If you don't show us, we have to assume we'll know that you do indeed have something to hide. Harry Reid said you don't pay taxes. I'll take him at his word and put a pox on your house unless you release your tax returns. (Sometimes it's fun acting like a Liberal.)

Show us your tax returns!

Come on westend1, are you not going to call BS on this one? Big girl, how did you acquire that elitist attitude that you and fellow medical professionals are the only ones that can understand Obamacare exchanges. Are you really that arrogant?

You've been slapped down on that assertion so many times it is no longer funny, just very, very sad. If Chelsea Clinton gets stopped for speeding, and the cop doesn't write her a ticket (because her name is Clinton), does this mean she didn't do anything illegal? Does the fact that she was not given a ticket mean she was not speeding? (This is probably not a good analogy because I doubt if Chelsea has ever driven a car.) How about some of the KKK members that were involved in lynchings. If the prosecutor declined to bring charges because he was a fellow KKK member, does this mean no crime was committed?

Name one that occurred within the last 50 years.

TBA, but not impeachment. I'm trying to remember, who was the last president to be impeached? And why did he get impeached? Was it lying to Congress? Wouldn't it be ironic (and historic) if the next president to be impeached for lying to Congress was his own wife? She's already done it, just hasn't been convicted.

Bill committed the ultimate Democrat sin of actually speaking the truth. I'm sure the punishment is being debated. He will probably be banned from Orgy Island for a couple of weeks. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting on an admission of guilt concerning healthcare. That is the second biggest no no for Democrats.

If he was the Republican nominee he would have already been branded a racist, bigot, misogynist, xenophobe, racist again, liar, buffoon, clown, bully, racist again, etc., etc., etc. And I noticed you didn't comment on Kaine's pathetic performance, but you will undoubtedly ridicule and have choice words for everyone on this board when we don't mention Trump's shortcomings.

If anyone speaks bad of Obama's policies then we know he must have a good head on his shoulders...until proven otherwise.

Is that all you can muster? No enlightening commentary? I didn't expect much of a reply, but this is just disappointing.

I don't think Trump was asking people to go watch a sex tape. I took his tweet as saying "go verify what an immoral and untrustworthy person she is...the proof is the sex tape". I have no problem with that request. A Democrat wouldn't have to make that request because the mainstream media would have smeared her beyond belief if she was attacking a Democrat.

The cost of shipping goods will go to their actual cost, as opposed to the artificially deflated costs due to tax deductions/write-offs.

The holier than thou left elitists argue that anyone using the flawed tax code to reduce their tax burden is starving children and depleting our military which puts our country at risk. But these same elitists have no problem exploiting these same loopholes to contribute as little as possible. Where is new tobie when I need a clarification on the word hypocrite.

I realize this was not to me, but I will attempt to explain. BS Wildcats, please reply if you have a different answer. No deductions for anything. Some businesses will have a higher cost of operation than other businesses by definition. If your line of work requires more expenses than other lines of work, the company pays for these expenses through higher compensation. That is the way it has always been, until the government decided to try and make things "fair". Every business has a cost of operation. Some businesses have more costs than others. That cost of doing business has to be factored into the price charged for the service provided. Therefore, the consumer picks and chooses which services they are willing to pay for...not the government. Giving deductions to certain businesses artificially deflates the true cost of providing the service. Let the consumer decide if the service is worth it.

Once true interactive TV becomes available, this will be solved. The technology is already here, just not implemented. One thing that scares me, and I'm convinced it's coming, (and in some part it is already being utilized) is the advertisements. When you activate any interactive feature, you are going to have to deal with advertisements surrounding the screen. Just look at this site. Just look at any website. The bandwidth for the added commercials is the holdup. We are already getting a taste of them on many channels (the little pop-ups at the bottom of the screen). As soon as they implement interactive TV in earnest, they will justify the cost of the new technology with ads littering every side of the screen. And as the good little sheeple we are, we will complain but still accept this. Man, I hope I'm wrong on this, but am willing to bet good money I'm not.

Agreed, and no other POTUS felt obligated to pave the way for Iran to obtain nuclear bombs for Iran either. Big Girl, do some research and try to refute the FACT that the Obama administration paved the way for Iran to legally obtain a nuclear arsenal. And after doing your research, please explain why you feel the need to post in bold letters the headline of Trump doing business with an Iranian bank 30 years ago, but fail to acknowledge that Obama gave Iran weapons of mass destruction...including the nuclear option.

How about you do some research. You post faulty accusations on a daily basis, then accuse others of being subhuman when you don't agree with their accusations. And research doesn't mean scanning the Liberal rags like Huffington Post, Mother Jones, Politifact, etc. to let them formulate your well-rounded opinion. While doing your research, see if you can find the definition of sheeple, then try to comprehend how that definition fits you to a tee. And you mysteriously (I had to retype that word three times because my laughing caused me to mistype it) fail to answer any challenging question I pose to you. How does it feel to have to look up to see the bottom of the barrel. If you look to the left you might see Hillary. If you look to the right you might see Obama.

And did this bank contribute to the Clinton Foundation? Do you really want to go down the road of who "did business" with who? You are such a hypocrite it is not even funny anymore. On second thought, yes, it is still funny. Please keep posting.

The $400 million was what the current administration confessed. Subsequent reporting has it much higher. Reports vary, but all say it's in the billions. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content] I just listed the first ones that came up. A Bing search will give plenty of information. Nobody is disputing the fact that Iran is receiving money in the billions. In fact, there is more consensus that the figure is in the billions than the administration's claim of consensus for Man-Made Global Warming.

The State of California is petitioning the Federal Government to allow illegals into Obamacare in California. Obama's administration not only thinks they can do whatever they want, they do whatever they want.