Englebert

Only if the military is willing to fight against it's own people. I don't know if they will. Many in the military will be in favor of secession. Many will not care and would refuse to participate in the killing of fellow Americans. It's hard to tell. If the military goes full bore with the U.S., then yes, a militia victory will never happen. If it does not and stays out of the fight, I think secession will be successful. Currently I don't think there is near enough will from the people to secede, but the movement is slowly (much too slowly) growing. If the majority of Texans (and other Constitutional Patriots) decided to quit paying taxes, how would the government respond? Would the President send in the military to round up millions of people? Would the military comply? If the Constitutional Patriots banded together and decided not to buy goods from any company not in favor of secession, how would the government respond? If enough people joined the movement, I don't think the government and military could stop it. But this takes extreme commitment from the people, and I don't think the compassion is there yet.

And there was absolutely no way in hell the (eventual) U.S. could stand a chance against the British, the greatest army the world had ever seen. And the strongest push for liberty from England was from middle to elderly white males. This push was spawned from an overly oppressive government. I'm not predicting a secession, but I am definitely advocating for one.

It would be something the Nation of Texas will have to work out. I'm worried that if we don't secede we will have to worry about people living on fixed incomes...present and future, not to mention the $20 trillion in debt we are on the hook for, not to mention all of the money going to services for illegals, not to mention all of the corruption in the Federal government, not to mention... I doubt if Texas would secede alone. Once a movement materializes (hopefully), I would be willing to bet other states would join. If not, I still would want to Texas to secede. And if it means war, well then I'm with Charlie...Let's Ride!

I did. I don't know how many people will follow suit...and Obama is a lying unconvicted criminal deserving of a jail cell with a good ol' boy named Bubba. It is amazing how you can read in psychology textbooks about people who can convince themselves of a false narrative just by repeating it over and over, but to see it in real life is fascinating. You can bury your head in the sand all you want, but some of us won't be fooled.

Most on here praise anyone against Obama's policies, regardless of skin color. Your attempts to paint everyone on here as racist are falling on deaf ears. Who are some of the blacks that are in lock-step with Obama's policies and yet deserving of our praise? Hell, name someone of any color that follows the Progressive Liberal agenda that are deserving of our praise.

Is this your attempt to change the subject after you brought race into the subject but cannot defend it's use?

Pretty much all sane people with more than two functioning brain cells are against Obama and the Leftist Socialist agenda...regardless of skin color. Nice to see you that you are a typical Leftist who has to throw out the race card when you can't defend your positions. Of course, everyone on here already knows that.

I haven't heard this quote before, and you've used it on multiple occasions recently. Is it something you made up? Is it a narrative the liberal press it trying to push? Does it fit a particular agenda (with absolutely no merit)? Please explain. I have a hunch it is an attempt to push a square peg through a round hole, but I'll reserve judgment pending your explanation.

Your attempts at reading comprehension fall way short on this one. You seem to be reading more than is written. Could it be that's what you want to believe so you can fit an agenda? And FYI, you've thrown out some very negative and unsubstantiated personal attacks against Trump. If anyone is filled with hate, the evidence overwhelmingly points directly at you.

So are you implying Obama blew up the levees?

Even Captain Obvious had to respond to your quote with a "Well duh!" Although Hillary might try to appoint him as a Supreme Court judge so he can wreak more havoc on our society while pulling a government paycheck.

Let's see if you change your tune if you have a teenage daughter that is being peeped on (and possibly/probably more) in the bathroom by a some pervert incentivized from no fear of prosecution or even rebuke.

I don't consider equating the bottom of the barrel vs the scum that lives under the barrel a compliment.

Probably not, but if sensible people finally wake up and look at the direction this country is headed, then maybe. I'm praying for Hope and Change we Texans can believe in.

I'm for secession regardless of who wins, but emphatically so if Hillary wins. When a socialist is able to win the last two presidential elections, and when a socialist is leading the polls in the presidential race, and when an admitted socialist comes close to winning the presidential primary, it is time for a major change.

What should they have done? It has been proven over and over and over that when government gets involved, prices rise. The government needs to get the hell out of healthcare, along with college, as well as all education...this list can get long in a hurry. I find it astonishing that anyone can believe the government is the source of solutions when there is an abundance of evidence showing government is the source of the problems. If you want to blame the government, blame Liberals who feel the need to stick their stinking noses is places they shouldn't belong.

The common denominator in the rise of cost of all those things is "more government involvement". Are corporations any more greedy today than they were 20+ years ago? You want to blame greed, but the level of greed has not risen in the past twenty years. Twenty plus years ago hospital care was affordable. This happened while the level of greed stayed the same and government regulations increased. So to get costs back down, are you suggesting we should we try to force corporations to not be so greedy? Is that your solution? And why do you keeping blaming the government's "lack of involvement" for all the ills of America, when the government's amount of involvement is truly to blame for most of our problems?

I've asked you repeatedly to state what offensive things Hannity has said. You have failed miserably to show one single thing. Same thing with Trump being corrupt. Same thing with Trump being a racist. Same thing with Trump being psychotic. Do you just spout out crap and not expect to be challenged? That sounds like someone with an entitled mentality. Have you no shame? Most people will learn from these mistakes and know to provide proof when spewing these lies. Only an entitled untouchable thinks (s)he can get away with such speech and not dare be challenged. Do you fit this category? Seriously, answer the question. Do you think you should be able to repeat lies and not be challenged on the truthfulness of your statements because of some perceived protected status? I'm very curious as to why you think you can repeat lies? Edit: You know, on second though, don't even answer. Democrats will be Democrats. How anyone, and I'm talking about anyone with two or more functional brain cells, can currently call themselves a Democrat after the Progressive Liberals/Socialists have taken over the party is unfathomable. If you or anyone fits that category, I have absolutely no desire to carry on any conversation with that individual.

It has always amazed me how many people accuse umpires/officials/referees of cheating or being just plain stupid/blind/moronic... They go on and on and on about how they cost their team a game. Every single one that I've seen, without exception...and there's been plenty, that have sucked it up and attempted to umpire or officiate themselves all of a sudden have a "Come to Jesus" moment and have a complete change of attitude. I think we can include this guy in that category...although he won't fully admit it.

Let me ask you something new tobie. In your own opinion, do you actually think Trump's comments were a call to assassinate (or even bring harm to) Hillary?

Just more fake outrage from a biased media, and the sheeple follow. Dan Rather lost all credibility ten years ago. And the Huffington Post has never had any credibility.

That's hilarious. Anybody that studies 600 hours of footage of a presidential candidate should be the one considered psychotic. I do agree with the author that both Obama and Trump are narcissistic. But then the author concludes that Trump is psychotic but Obama is smart. I had to quit reading at that point. (My laughter was impeding my reading ability.) Sometimes it's easy to spot bias bull. I'm still surprised you fall for this kind of stuff.

And yet you fail to answer the questions, so I will ask you again. Your attempt at avoiding the question is about as bad as your acceptance of the Left propaganda machine. What do you consider examples of Trump's psychotic and totally out of control behavior? And include examples of his stupidity, since you threw that one in too.

All this fake outrage is comical. Hillary actually puts lives at stake by putting classified material in an unsecure location, resulting in zero outrage from the Left. Trump just says things he's been saying for the last year or so and the left are foaming at the mouth calling for his ouster. Such phony and comical behavior. And the Leftist sheeple gobble it up like candy. And please explain what you consider as Trump's psychotic and totally out of control behavior. And also explain why Trump's not racist now. Is it perhaps that the left wing media has decided that lie didn't stick?

I'm not sure why all of these Clinton "associates" keep mysteriously dying. Hillary can just rub them out herself. After all, the FBI and DOJ are not going bring charges against her. This has been proven.