setxathlete14

Show me another orangefield offense that produced better...

They have a pretty good passer coming up because someones nephew or son can throw the Pigskin a quarter mile they want to change the offense to pro style again for 2 years to cater to the said prolific passer. And go sub .500s trying to throw it deep every play.

In short, proof is in the pudding that (Orangefield) historically operates the best out of the slot t... records show that.. for whatever reason that may be.

To note, you compare that to ORANGEFIELD non slot t production. It is successful with better output. Non slot t offenses were far worse speaking for OF

Point made. Thanks for the facts to back it

Historically I'd say they've had more offensive success in the slot t than any other offense.

Some don't know the true value of the latter at the current school. Selfishly, Hopefully we get to keep him

Can he run too? Won't need to throw if he can run

After seeing some of your posts, your "heards" from an elementary school cafeteria?

Intresting game Don't see OF losing by 10 or more at all.

@Powell2020 spreading false information like i said from the get go.

Same "lightning in the bottle" mainly Juniors team that went 1-7 the year prior? Wrong forum but this warranted a response. You may hear "impatient" from 1 or 2 clueless folk but your info is clearly biased and 100% false.

You know they always say this. But how is that interpretation when the pay scale is already set, public, and based off years experience. Mostly. They know the pay when they apply

Sumrall comes to mind here as a great leader

Really. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Im not triggered, you're like a stuck record .. 85% of your posts are complaining/whining/ whaterver about the slot T.. add this one to it.

He doesn't know. He just whines about slot t like a child who lost their favorite toy

But usually the ones saying it. Not so macho 🤣🤣

In my opinion bridge city would be more competitive out of a slot t offense.

I tried standing on business about 1 mentioned, even offered wagering odds on it against one's saying "for sure applied"

No shots. Just have a good idea and info. you're in the know around OF without speculation on here. I do agree that was a great move but the admin on the community survey and hearsay says there's a bunch of great candidates Didn't know this could trigger such a childish reaction With the "taking shots" comment

@Cu Chulainnprobably knows who's it is to lose

I wouldn't call it dirty id call it smart

They started that trend iirc very smart and legal

Good draw for OF then.