
bullets13
SETXsports Staff-
Posts
34,911 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
50
Everything posted by bullets13
-
Tough matchup for the falcons. Boerne definitely has to be the favorite to win it all. They won their regional final game 7-0 over Hidalgo.
-
Regional Finals, Huffman Hargrave vs. Splendora
bullets13 replied to bullets13's topic in High School Soccer
The great run continues! Congrats! -
Regional Finals, Huffman Hargrave vs. Splendora
bullets13 replied to bullets13's topic in High School Soccer
Are you at the game? On the feed that looked like it could be a legit pk that got called back -
I'm not sure if it's because it's govt police, or because he shot someone from a group that was so radical they literally broke down doors to the govt. I think there's a legitimate argument that he's in danger if his identity is released. I honestly do not don't know if any agency involved has any legal obligation to identify the officer since he's been cleared. @tvc184 probably has a much better understanding of this.
-
I just watched clear videos from two different angles. the videos do show the tactical officers coming up the stairs behind her. They didn't get there in time to keep her from breaching, though. Maybe if they had they could've kept her from trying to go through. But at the time she tried to breach there were still politicians in the hall she was trying to enter. It was a little different later when a bunch of idiots were running around an empty building stealing podiums and stuff. I admire the white house police's restraint throughout the whole ordeal. They could've legally and justifiably shot a LOT of people throughout the invasion, insurrection, whatever you want to call it.
-
questionable shooting? you're joking, right?
-
tough to say. not really anything to compare it to.
-
grand jury cleared him so his identity wasn't released for his own safety.
-
Huffman Hargrave (15-7-6) plays district rival Splendora (21-7-2)tonight at 6 PM, at Randall Reed Stadium in New Caney, for a chance to advance to the state semifinals. Splendora advanced this far with wins over Bridge City (7-0), Houston Furr (3-2), Columbia (4-1), and Sealy (3-2). Huffman defeated Silsbee (4-3), Stafford (2-1), East Chambers (1-0), and Brookshire Royal (2-1). These two teams met twice in the regular season, with each team winning at home (2-1 @ Huffman, 2-0 @ Splendora.) The winner of this game will face the winner of Boerne and Hidalgo in the state semifinals.
-
Just like the last debate, which is why I'm done debating. You ignore being proven wrong, you ignore having your sources proven wrong, you ignore having accurate sources provided. you then deflect by posting one politician's biased observations without addressing the fact that you've been completely proven wrong by real sources (including your own), and then just scream "What did the doctor in my youtube video say?" over and over again, and act like you're somehow being done wrong by not getting an answer to the question. I provided you with all of the numbers you asked for at the beginning of this thread. you didn't like them. your assertion that the death rate in the US has not increased has been entirely disproven. a biased youtube video is not an accurate rebuttal. i'm done
-
No doubt things have been reported that aren't accurate. But there's a difference between political spin from the left-controlled media and actual concrete numbers from multiple sources. there's also a difference between questioning sources and motives versus ignoring concrete facts because they don't jive with what you want to believe, which is what some folks on here like to do.
-
I love how I can make five valid points, back them up with numbers, refute your argument with your own sources, and you just consistently ignore all of that and continue to pound your own misguided point and your one youtube doctor. I'm not going to do what I did last time and spend a lot of time trying to make you understand the researched and cited answers that I've provided to your questions. You don't want those answers. You'd rather play dumb, which is annoying (or sad, if you're not actually playing). When faced with facts, often from your own sources, your fallback is completely ignoring those facts and citing anecdotal information from a biased youtube doctor. So, here's my last comment on here, and I won't respond again, because I already know what your response will be, and it won't have anything to do with what we're talking about: you have a consistent pattern of demanding that others provide you with numbers and proof that your argument is wrong, instead of being willing to provide your own proof that your argument is right. In this case, you "were still waiting for someone to provide you with death numbers for the last ten years". I did this, sourced and cited, and you didn't like that the numbers didn't match your erroneous argument. you intentionally posted a chart that you knew was inaccurate, or were too dumb to notice the bright red box above said chart saying the chart was based on trends, and did not reflect the pandemic (I don't believe you did not see this box). I proved your chart was wrong. you ignored this, and posted your biased youtube politician. So in two debates with me in a row, you've provided erroneous sources, I've proved those sources wrong, you've ignored my legitimate sources (one being your own source), and then you've fallen back to youtube videos from a politcal shill as sources. 400,000 more people died in 2020 in the US than the year before. it's inarguable, even if a biased politician/physician claims differently in an interview.
-
i admire your tenacity, no matter how misguided and ridiculous it is. over and over you say things like "I'm still waiting for someone to provide me data for death numbers for the last ten years", because you're apparently too lazy to do it yourself, or more likely, you figure if nobody takes the time to do it then you can keep claiming whatever you want. Then I spend 5 whole minutes researching, and provide those numbers, with links to all sources, which are all legitimate. Those numbers don't jive with your argument, so all of a sudden you're capable of finding your own information, because you don't like what mine says. Of course, you completely ignore a giant red box on the top of your source that clearly states that the data is inaccurate. Why? Because it's a chart based on yearly trends, not on concrete numbers, and does not factor in the covid pandemic of the last year and a half. That's literally what the giant red box says. So I copy and paste the giant red box, which states your numbers are wrong, and you counter with youtube videos from one ultra-conservative doctor/politician that is clearly downplaying the severity of the covid pandemic for political reasons (not unlike liberal politicians who exploit it to look even worse than it actually is for political reasons). The funniest part about this is the last time you asked for numbers and they were provided from reputable sources, and you didn't like how badly wrong they proved you, you linked a different youtube video from the same politician/doctor and said the same thing ("Of course there are many doctors with the same story across the country."). This would be no different than you and I having a debate about the immigration problem at the border and me linking videos from Kamala Harris saying there isn't a border problem and pretending like that's a valid rebuttal to you providing me concrete numbers from a valid source showing that vastly more illegal aliens are crossing the border now than 6 months ago. You asked for concrete numbers. Here they are: 2000-2019- on average the US had 19K more deaths a year than the year previous 2020- The US had 405K more deaths than 2019. There's no refuting that, no matter how many politically slanted youtube videos you use as "sources".
-
It's your source, not mine. It appears that the answer to your question is "yes." Did you purposefully ignore the big red box at the top that said "NOTE: All 2020 and later data are UN projections and DO NOT include any impacts of the COVID-19 virus". Something tells me you saw it and ignored it on purpose, because you wanted some numbers that support your viewpoint.
-
Literally at the top of your source, above your chart, meaning that this chart is not accurate at all for 2020 and 2021, because those years on the chart are not concrete numbers, but simply projections based on 70 year trends that don't factor in covid: NOTE: All 2020 and later data are UN projections and DO NOT include any impacts of the COVID-19 virus.
-
This chart has US deaths from 2000 to 2018. It does not have 2019 or 2020. [Hidden Content] This has the total number of US deaths for 2019 (2,854,838). Both 2017 and 2018 had 2.8 million deaths as well. [Hidden Content] This has the total # of deaths for 2020 at the bottom. (3,358,814) [Hidden Content] The first chart shows that in 18 years the average deaths a year increased by about 385,000 total as populations increased, or approximately 21,000 a year. Deaths increased by around 450,000 between 2019 and 2020.
-
[Hidden Content] January–December 2020%2C the,(91.5 deaths per 100%2C000). "During January–December 2020, the estimated 2020 age-adjusted death rate increased for the first time since 2017, with an increase of 15.9% compared with 2019, from 715.2 to 828.7 deaths per 100,000 population. COVID-19 was the underlying or a contributing cause of 377,883 deaths (91.5 deaths per 100,000)" [Hidden Content] Of the approximately 3,358,814 deaths that occurred in the U.S. last year, SARS-CoV-2 accounted for approximately 375,000, with only heart disease and cancer claiming a higher mortality rates, Farida B. Ahmad, MPH, of the National Center for Health Statistics at the CDC, and colleagues wrote in Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report — and, they added, Covid-19 replaced suicide as one of 2020’s top 10 leading causes of death. [Hidden Content] There's one for you from your favorite source written 9/1/20, showing that at that time there had already been 200,000 excess deaths in the US for 2020.
-
Girls - A&M Consolidated vs. Friendswood/Post updates here!
bullets13 replied to WOSgrad's topic in High School Soccer
Friendswood advances 2-0 -
Boys - Huffman Hargrave 2 Brookshire Royal 1/FINAL
bullets13 replied to WOSgrad's topic in High School Soccer
Congrats HH, and coach McD! -
Boys - Huffman Hargrave 2 Brookshire Royal 1/FINAL
bullets13 replied to WOSgrad's topic in High School Soccer
Let’s go! -
Girls - Salado 2 Hardin-Jefferson 1/FINAL
bullets13 replied to WOSgrad's topic in High School Soccer
Salado wins 2-1. Great season, hawks!