mytwocents-28

On 12/22/2016 at 8:16 AM, BMTSoulja1 said:

Very interesting,  it I must say, due to the circumstances, I'm not really surprised...

And what circumstances are you speaking of soulja?

7 hours ago, robanadana said:

I work for a large corporation. If I go to my boss, or for that matter if any employee of that boss does, with an ALLEGED impropriety and my boss doesn't act on it that makes the boss just as liable as the guilty party. If Flanigan went to BISD about this issue and they didn't act then I'm pretty sure they are as liable as Flanigan. Coach made a mistake that he tried to justify because his superiors didn't act upon the theft allegation. Both are at fault.

Gotta love how this comment was ignored.

Dancing around the subject. Nice.

1 hour ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Not at all.  Are you having mental issues or something?  Most would see that I'm looking at it from a third party approach and going toward the devil's advocate route.  

You said black and white, when in fact it's not black and white.

18 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

How can you prove when cameras are turned off or on?  Why take that chance?  I mean, WHO skates in the rules like that?

So basically you are trying to shift the blame to him even though you don't know if he did it or not. Wow soulja.

33 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So you can really justify installing hidden cameras where minors are getting dressed and undressed and honestly say that it's ok?  Do you have a kid/kids?

Did you not read hitmans post? The cameras were turned off when kids were supposed to be getting dressed soulja. They were only turned on when no-one was supposed to be in the locker room. Talk about selective reading comprehension.

3 hours ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Black and white, he wasn't supposed to do it, there's NO gray area...  You don't install cameras, then you're coaching your team in the playoffs...

I'm failing to see where it is said that he wasn't supposed to do it. It isn't against the law according to hitman. 

8 minutes ago, team first said:

A kid was stealing and the district turned its nose at it. So yea the district is very faulty.

^this

Did any of those districts have hostil take overs? No I didn't think so.

6 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Ok, so with that being said why is this about the district being the antagonists and not the actual person that made the dumb decision?

Because if the district would've done something in the first place then the actual person wouldn't have had to resort to such extreme measures.

3 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

You'll agree with anything, I've learned as long as it have to do with anything BISD...  You never addressed my post about Vidor...

And I've learned that no matter the proof and logic people use, anyone that says something against BISD will be labelled as a hater in your eyes. And as for the vidor comment, the people that were responsible were handled with. Nice try on trying to deflect from the bad light BISD is under though.

2 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So you're saying that rules only apply to certain individuals and certain situations...  ... And obviously certain school districts.  ok.  

So in Vidor, the when they vandalized the a school a few years ago with graffiti, it was justified because of where it was and who did it, right?  smh

Where did you get that from?Where did i ever say that what he did wasn't a crime?

2 minutes ago, XX Man said:

BMTSoulja1, I hate to have to point this out to you, but this is a public forum where any member can comment on any post here. This is not a BISD forum, that only BISD people can comment. With that said, I back Flanigan and I agree with NHSBulldog Fan.

Thank you. Couldn't have said it better myself.

36 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

...you have no clue...  And if your inside info is pegging BISD as the culprit, then you have bogus info...

Salty much??

BISD refused to listen to the coach they hired when he said there was a thief in the school. Guess they didnt learn their lesson with the last THIEF. So coach decides to protect his players. Same example as lean on me with Morgan freeman. What I was saying was it doesn't look good on BISD when a coach has to break the law to stop crime in the district because BISD refused to do anything about it.

When does the game start?

36 minutes ago, D3zii said:

From what I'm hearing BISD had nothing to do with this situation, unless u wanna say they hired him but, let's just wait Til it comes to surface before we go blaming people here...

I'm not blaming anyone. And BISD has nothing to do with it? Aren't they the ones who placed him on admin leave?

Wow. I just received some inside information and if its true then this isn't going to make BISD look good at all.

200+ rushing yards and 100+ passing yards in the second round  as a sophomore? That QB just got the attention of every scout in the country.

On 11/17/2016 at 6:28 AM, robanadana said:

^^^^^^^

This is the truth...you hit the nail on the head. Alicia told me she named them from those L'Amour novels. The eldest son is named Remington but he goes by Cutler. Didn't play football; only basketball. We only have one left and I'm not sure he'll play QB for the Pirates.

Actually Remington and Cutler are two different kids lol.

9 hours ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Keep hope alive man, there's always a chance Manvel could have bus trouble. They're probably fast enough to run from Highway 6 to third ward and still make it to the game on time though.

Hahahahahaha Now that's funny. Thanks 14.2 I needed that laugh.

Crosby should have this hands down. Teams don't realize how hard it is to defend that vidor offense. Crosby defense should have this in the bag if they don't create too many yards with those PF.

Crosby by 17.

48 minutes ago, TradenupBH said:

Should, Vidor looked good. I wonder if we play ya'll again next year in pre-district?

It was a 2 year home and home agreement so we should. Hopefully it'll be a closer game this time.

3 hours ago, CougarCal said:

Another quick question, if Westbrook had dropped down to 22-5A would that had helped the strength of your district?

Heck yeah it would have.

1 hour ago, Red Dawn said:

The series split 2-2 this year. 

With that said I'd have to say after reviewing only the 4 playoff match ups that 22-5A was a slight bit better than 21-5A. 

Crosby is class of both districts but Vidor played tough. 

PAM blew Porter out

PNG snuck by BH

NC snuck by BmtC

After being dominated by 21-5A in recent years, this was a better year for 22-5A. 

Go Crosby

Wow a crosby fan who is actually admitting 22-5A is slightly better than 21-5A. I need to go downstairs to see if I can see ice on the walls lol.

Come on jags