AggiesAreWe

But ranking a team #48 in a top 50 poll that returns 19 starters, went undefeated in district (beat North Shore, who you guys have at #16 and they return less starters than WB) and went 3 rounds deep in the playoffs, makes that poll look weak. It looks as though you just took the big names and threw them in just to make the poll look credible. I haven't seen the mag yet ( can't seem to find it anywhere in this area ???), so I really can't draw an opinion on how good or bad the mag is. But I do know one thing, that 5A poll of yall's is bogus. ;)

With my new diet, I'll have to find "other things" on the Hamburger Depot menus. :'(

[quote name="SgtRey" post="817987" timestamp="1279073420"] [quote author=PNGFan link=topic=70950.msg817832#msg817832 date=1279026997] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=70950.msg817716#msg817716 date=1278971887] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=70950.msg817702#msg817702 date=1278968781] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=70950.msg817694#msg817694 date=1278966282] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=70950.msg817690#msg817690 date=1278965868] [quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=70950.msg817655#msg817655 date=1278957669] My prediction, the game will end up being played at Durley. [/quote] I agree. [/quote] ::) ::)   As I said, do either one of you have anything to support your predictions that the stadium will not be ready?  A hunch maybe?  Or are you waiting in 'hope' that it is not finished?  If that's the case, that makes somebody sound like a hater... [/quote] No hater, Soulja. I am going off of what is told to me and what I see with my own eyes. I am hoping for BISD's sake (and the fans) that it will be finished in time for the first game. It's going to be very close though. [/quote]Seems that information my be a bit inaccurate.  Butch Stadium will be finished on schedule.  Then after that, I'll wonder if I can get you to watch a game with me @ the new digs... ;D ;D [/quote] Soul, I am comparing the new stadium to where ours was at that time. What worries me is the press box being completed. I think everything else will be completed. The Reservation press box seemed like it was never going to be completed. [/quote] Well Mr Sanchez and Company can broadcast from the stands with Soulja. 82 and Sgt Rey [/quote] It's not like I haven't done that before. ;) ;D

[quote name="Matthew328" post="818004" timestamp="1279076549"] As for the overall quality of the magazine I am very proud of what a very small team of writers was able to accomplish, despite many, many challenges. Writers not turning in work timely or at all, scrambling to find quality people to write capsules etc. Considering that the majority of our crew works full time jobs not involving HS Football, considering we were all a bunch of rookies and considering we were still able to complete a product comparable to DCTF in a lot of ways in our first try is IMO a minor miracle.  I think next year's edition will be even better and in subsequent years the product will continue to get better and better and [b]if it doesn't then we shouldn't be doing one in the first pla[/b]ce.   [/quote] I can agree with that. ;)

[quote name="Matthew328" post="817998" timestamp="1279076016"] [quote author=SgtRey link=topic=70964.msg817821#msg817821 date=1279024755] I don't believe Matt will entertain the xplanation...but I'll try: The Old Coach came up with these prediction thru extensive "Inside Access" to ALL high school programs(7 day free trial..yes 7 days!!!).  We started our research for the 2010 rankings in 2003!!!  After many years of computer in input into the "Old Coach Psychic Processor" our computer's tabulations produced a FNF top 50 this year!!.  We are so proud ::) ::) ::) [/quote] Nope I am here.  If you want to take shots at what I do on TheOldCoach feel free to e-mail me or call me, you could have come up to me also at the 7 on 7 State Tournament and discussed with me. I am sure the folks on this board would like for relevant topics to be discussed, not taking shots at someone who is simply doing his job. Unlike other writers and people who cover HS Football I spend my own money to go out and see as much HS Football as possible statewide.  I don't stay in one area and watch one group of teams, I try to see everyone.  As for the rankings, I will be the first to admit WB was low but rankings were not my realm, it was a group effort and in that case I was over ruled...however rankings are just opinions, DCTF has bad rankings all the time...other sites and magazines have bad rankings all the time as well....HS Football is a funny game and sometimes things turn out weird.  My e-mail is [email protected] if you'd like to discuss further. [/quote] Just what exactly needs to be discussed further? I think the point has been made very clear. West Brook being ranked #48 in your mag's poll shows a lack of football inteligence. Plain and simple. What else is there to discuss?

My whole point of my posts on this subject was to combat the fact that "SOME" people are quick to down play 7 on 7 when their team is not successful or as successful as they wanted them to be but the minute they are successful in 7 on 7 they want to promote and acknowledge that success as an intergral part of their team's football program. ::) You are either for or against 7 on 7. You can't be both by basing it on how well or bad your team does in the 7 on 7. That's what "SOME" of you are doing. If they do well, you are all giddy about it. If they do bad, well we hear comments like "It's just touch football", "It doesn't mean anything", "It's just practice", and "It doesn't matter when the "real" football starts in the fall". Give me a break!! ::) Don't judge the game based on how your team does in the sport. ;)

[quote name="WOSgrad" post="817710" timestamp="1278971472"] 1.      Carthage 2.      Brownwood 3.      Sealy 4.      Gilmer 5.      Lovejoy 6.      Cuero [b]7.      Kirbyville[/b] 8.      Wimberley 9.      Snyder 10.    Giddings 11.    Brookshire Royal 12.    Argyle 13.    Texarkana Liberty-Eylau 14.    Prosper 15.    Bridgeport 16.    Kennedale 17.    Abilene Wylie 18.    Celina 19.    Navasota [b]20.    West Orange-Stark[/b] 21.    Pittsburg [b]22.    Cleveland[/b] 23.    Lindale 24.    Graham 25.    Mexia 26.    Monahans 27.    Borger 28.    Texarkana Pleasant Grove 29.    Pilot Point [b]30.    Coldspring[/b] 31.    Robstown 32.    Seminole 33.    Sinton 34.    Lampasas [b]35.    Jasper[/b] 36.    Alvarado 37.    Paris 38.    Sinton (?) 39.    Seminole (?) 40.    Ingleside [b]41.    Silsbee[/b] 42.    Brownsboro 43.    Waco La Vega [b]44.    Huffman[/b] 45.    Wills Point 46.    Burnet 47.    Lorena 48.    Lubbock Estacado 49.    Mineral Wells 50.    Kaufman [/quote] Silsbee should be ahead of Coldspring. WOS should be ahead of Kirbyville.

[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="817716" timestamp="1278971887"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=70950.msg817702#msg817702 date=1278968781] [quote author=BMTSoulja1 link=topic=70950.msg817694#msg817694 date=1278966282] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=70950.msg817690#msg817690 date=1278965868] [quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=70950.msg817655#msg817655 date=1278957669] My prediction, the game will end up being played at Durley. [/quote] I agree. [/quote] ::) ::)   As I said, do either one of you have anything to support your predictions that the stadium will not be ready?  A hunch maybe?  Or are you waiting in 'hope' that it is not finished?  If that's the case, that makes somebody sound like a hater... [/quote] No hater, Soulja. I am going off of what is told to me and what I see with my own eyes. I am hoping for BISD's sake (and the fans) that it will be finished in time for the first game. It's going to be very close though. [/quote]Seems that information my be a bit inaccurate.  Butch Stadium will be finished on schedule.  Then after that, I'll wonder if I can get you to watch a game with me @ the new digs... ;D ;D [/quote] I'll be in the pressbox. ;D

[quote name="SgtRey" post="817766" timestamp="1278982091"] Where's Matthew 328, or 721 or $19.99, whatever his screen name is...?   This is Prohibibidabido...I say it in Spanish, because it's that serious!!! [/quote] I agree, SgtRey. I would like to hear Matt's explanation for this lame poll. C'mon, the Bruins #48!!! (and I thought DCTF's polls were bad)

I'm sorry, but West Brook is at least a top 20 team in the state with those 19 starters returning from a team that was district champs and went 3 rounds deep. I say top 15 at the least. 48!!!! North Shore 16!! A team that West Brook beat last year!!! The mag looses credibility with this pick. ::)

[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="817694" timestamp="1278966282"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=70950.msg817690#msg817690 date=1278965868] [quote author=ShlyKBMT link=topic=70950.msg817655#msg817655 date=1278957669] My prediction, the game will end up being played at Durley. [/quote] I agree. [/quote] ::) ::)   As I said, do either one of you have anything to support your predictions that the stadium will not be ready?  A hunch maybe?  Or are you waiting in 'hope' that it is not finished?  If that's the case, that makes somebody sound like a hater... [/quote] No hater, Soulja. I am going off of what is told to me and what I see with my own eyes. I am hoping for BISD's sake (and the fans) that it will be finished in time for the first game. It's going to be very close though.

[quote name="ShlyKBMT" post="817655" timestamp="1278957669"] My prediction, the game will end up being played at Durley. [/quote] I agree.

Have yet to see this mag anywhere at any store in the Golden Triangle area. Must be just a DFW, SA, HOU, Austin circulation.

[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="817581" timestamp="1278904487"] He's just picking with his 'Brother from another Mother'   ;D ;D [/quote] Them's fightin words, partner. I thought we wuz tight.

[quote name="D3zii" post="817580" timestamp="1278904306"] Kinda Early for this Game. Ayy Agg... [/quote] Never too early according to some.(one) ;) ::)

Let's hear them!

25 starting lineup changes could happen by the time this one kicks off. ::) My, someone must be bored. ::)

Predictions about a game that's almost two months away. ::) I guess Coop has to keep his status of posting the most threads and posts on here. ::)

[quote name="KFDM COOP" post="817403" timestamp="1278799304"] Does it have anything to do once the pads are on? NO! Is it great practice? Yes it is! [/quote] I think you would have some COACHES argue this point with you. ;) Okay Grad, I am finished now. Don't want anymore crying. ;) ::)

[quote name="KFDM COOP" post="817401" timestamp="1278798902"] Congratulated them on doing well in the event. [/quote] Isn't this just meaningless, according to you?

[quote name="KFDM COOP" post="817398" timestamp="1278798683"] That's correct!!!!  Glad it has no effect come August. Havent seen to many teams win State titles in 7 on 7 and do the same in pads. [/quote] Then why bother congratulating someone on just practice? Why make a big deal out of it?

Wait a minute, I thought this was all a waste of time? Didn't the resident football guru call this just a glorified 2 below? Doesn't mean anything? Wow, talk about your about face. ::)

[quote name="KFDM COOP" post="817369" timestamp="1278794868"] LC-M was a few seconds away from being in the State Championship. [/quote] But it's just practice, right Kerry? ::)

[quote name="KFDM COOP" post="817341" timestamp="1278787958"] Yes that is a final. Looks like LC-M played LT closer than anyone up to now. [/quote] But it's just practice, right Kerry?

[quote name="Kvillecats" post="817330" timestamp="1278784932"] [quote author=speedkills link=topic=70789.msg816707#msg816707 date=1278565003] While we are on the subject of long runs the first time LeFredrick Ford touched the ball it was also a 65 yard touchdown run untouched. [/quote] After Johnson scored his touchdown, Kirbyville completly shut the Tigers down while Caleb was mossing all over the Tigers secondary. Silsbee may have beat Kirbyville in 30's or 50's, [b]but i seriously doubt they want any of the Black and Red in 2010 ;)[/b][/quote] Child Please!!! ::) What about those wins in 2004-2006? BTW, the score was 42-32 in 2006, that was a typo of mine. But, if I remember correctly, Silsbee had a huge lead in this game, at one time led 35-13. Tigers kind of cruised the rest of the game. ;) Again, it was a SCRIMMAGE that ended tied at 1-1. Go hang your hat on something else.