AggiesAreWe

!score 20-3 Q3 25 yard FG 7:52

King offense starting to take over.

!score 17-3 Q3

Mostly soph. and freshmen from what I was told. No 9th team.

!score 0-42 HALF

!score 0-35 Q2

!score 10-3 HALF

The two DE's for King (#13 and #45) are problems for SC.

!score 0-28 Q2

2 minute timeout

!score 0-21 Q2

!score 10-3 Q2 4 yard TD run 2:11

#13 with a big sack on SC 4th down try. King takes over on downs at their 48 5:27

!score 0-14 Q2

!score 3-3 Q2 36 yard FG 10:03

!score 0-7 Q2

!score 0-3 Q2

King with a good drive going. Down to the SC 20

3 and out for SC

!score 0-7 Q1

SC defense looked good on that drive.

!score 0-3 Q1 44 yard FG 7:47

Transfer DE just made his presence

Nice kick return by SC

I agree. The three poll system is the fairest (and probably most accurate). Combining 3 classifications is tough because of the disparity and folks are always trying to make comparisons of "who would beat who". That's not necessarily what these rankings represent. Does head to head come into play when ranking two teams? You bet it does. But the "hypothetical" win does not. You have to look at it from the perspective of how that team is doing within it's classification and it's schedule. BTW, strength of schedule is a factor in my mind. Also, we always have a faction of folks that cry about the inclusion of Houston area teams and teams way up north. But the bottom line is, those are in our coverage so therefore they can be in the rankings. As far as work load, doing two or three doesn't really matter. Still ranking 30 teams. I'll give it some more thought and will reach out to some coaches (ones who asked for it to come back) and see what they say. Again, I would appreciate anyone's thoughts on this matter and please post them here.