AggiesAreWe

Tenaha picks off SP pass. Tiger ball at Shark 13

9 yard TD run. PAT good 2:17 2nd 39-0 Tenaha

51 yard TD run. PAT good 7:34 2nd 32-0 Tenaha

tt

4 yard TD pass. PAT no good 11:06 2nd 25-0 Tenaha

end 1st Tenaha 19 Sabine Pass 0

SP fumbles kickoff Tenaha ball at Shark 19

16 yard TD run. PAT no good 1:21 1st 19-0 Tenaha

SP fumbles on their own 24

32 yard TD pass. PAT no good 4:20 1st 13-0 Tenaha

3 and out for SP Tenaha ball at their 44.

39 yard TD pass. PAT good 7:43 1st Tenaha 7 Sabine Pass 0

Sabine Pass on offense first. After picking up a first down, forced to punt. Tenaha ball at their own 21.

Yep. BTW folks, we have a game thread posted. Please post updates there.

Texanlive.com

No radio, just online video.

Tenaha visitors Sabine Pass home Tenaha suiting out 36 Sabine Pass suiting out 24

I am here at Raider Stadium and will provide updates.

Prayers

I know the guy is a lawyer.

Ruling one sibling eligible and not the other, though both left school for same school, live in same household, would make no sense. The fact that one of the brothers is not projected to improve his situation by the move is immaterial. What would be the reasoning for not ruling the other sibling eligible but allowing the other to play?

Yep

Individual household

If both kids play varsity basketball, then both moved for athletic reasons. UIL or DEC doesn't rule on if one brother is better than the other. Allowing one brother to play just because he was only moved due to the other brother having moved, would be petty in my book. They both left a school for same school, play athletics, live under same roof. The rule should apply to both, no matter how much better one is over the other. The parents should take that into consideration when making those decisions. Otherwise, don't transfer.

That would be pretty petty.