Jump to content

JohnnyT60

Members
  • Posts

    4,469
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by JohnnyT60

  1. [quote name="Mc" post="813385" timestamp="1276801055"]
    [quote author=JohnnyT60 link=topic=70558.msg813377#msg813377 date=1276800012]
    [quote author=trout link=topic=70558.msg813315#msg813315 date=1276784016]
    It was a good tournament with some very strong teams. If you want the exposure go to Houston, if you want to get seen by colleges go to Houston, if you want to play against the best teams go to Houston that is where it is at. I don't think that the Premier is going to stay around very long but the tournament got our team some good looks and just reinforced who our players are to some colleges and that will go a long way to getting them recruited. Overall it was a good experience and helped our team.   
    [/quote]

    Trout, no doubt this is true. I would have rather seen another layer or two added to the Gold organization tournamenys where districts at least had a voice. With that being said he did get some changes that were needed. The one area of change I disagree with is prohibiting participation of college kids with eligibility remaining. With the exception of East Coast kids, they have nowhere else to play. A better choice would have been to limit the number of college kids. This hurts small organizations a lot more than the large ones.
    [/quote]Doesn't absolutely leave those with eligibility remaining nowhere else to play, but their choices are limited to ASA 18U, IFA, etc. Doubtful most will continue playing with only those options. What I have noticed is that it has somewhat leveled the playing field. No longer are the Impact Gold's of the softball world grabbing up the cream of the college freshman's with eligibility remaining. Neither Impact Gold team qualified last weekend at the ASA Territorial, nor did Impact Gold Piro qualify for the Premier the weekend before. Impact Gold Burke was an invitee to the Premier.
    [/quote]

    Mc I agree some teams did stack their teams with mostly college players, but the answer should have been limit each team to two college players instead of completely eliminating their real chance to play.
  2. [quote name="trout" post="813315" timestamp="1276784016"]
    It was a good tournament with some very strong teams. If you want the exposure go to Houston, if you want to get seen by colleges go to Houston, if you want to play against the best teams go to Houston that is where it is at. I don't think that the Premier is going to stay around very long but the tournament got our team some good looks and just reinforced who our players are to some colleges and that will go a long way to getting them recruited. Overall it was a good experience and helped our team.   
    [/quote]

    Trout, no doubt this is true. I would have rather seen another layer or two added to the Gold organization tournamenys where districts at least had a voice. With that being said he did get some changes that were needed. The one area of change I disagree with is prohibiting participation of college kids with eligibility remaining. With the exception of East Coast kids, they have nowhere else to play. A better choice would have been to limit the number of college kids. This hurts small organizations a lot more than the large ones.
  3. [quote name="shake and bake" post="798054" timestamp="1273091878"]
    [quote author=JohnnyT60 link=topic=69383.msg798031#msg798031 date=1273088381]
    [quote author=shake and bake link=topic=69383.msg797922#msg797922 date=1273066974]
    Just trying to fly under the radar :D  If you have good kids you can put a bunch of monkeys as coaches and do good things..... OH wait a minute , we already have done that! :)
    [/quote]

    We once won a NC when we had coaches cussing and strangling each other!   ;D
    [/quote]Wasn't that with a QUEEN and a MIDGET? ;D
    [/quote]

    Ding, Ding, Ding!!!!!
×
×
  • Create New...