LumRaiderFan

Thanks for proving my point, she could be right. Look at the information being posted and critique that before simply dismissing the source. I’m not sure why this is so hard.

Problem solved, they’re not eligible.

So which news sources would you consider a REAL source? Why is it that some “random” lady couldn’t possibly know the facts about something. And you are wrong, if a post is made and you think it’s wrong, don’t simply bash the source, provide evidence that it is wrong.

Reagan can make his own argument and IF they weren’t facts, simply dispute them with the real facts. There are several things that could depress me, but a sports forum (even being the best one ), ain’t one of them, lol.

Truth can come from any source, as can misinformation. I think most posts are made for discussion, not necessarily to claim without a doubt they are 100% accurate. Back to my original point, the debate shouldn’t end just because someone doesn’t like the source.

Not much surprises me when it comes to democrats, but I gotta admit, this one did a little bit. I never expected New Yorkers to embrace government dependency so much as to vote someone like this in, and he was very honest upfront about his intentions.

That the largest city in the US elected a democratic socialist (communist) as their mayor is a very big deal. Soon we’re gonna see just how big. Remember all the dimwits that were surprised at the direction biden took the country, same folks will be shocked, once again.

Yep, and the covid lies.

No comment on Mamdani’s pick, you know, what the thread is about. Every response of yours is about Trump, no matter what. And from the guy that hates whataboutisms, lol.

Not sure there is such a thing as a single verified source that I would trust, certainly not one from the government or mainstream media. There are lots of folks on social media that provide solid information backed up by research that lots of folks haven’t heard of.

Just because someone doesn’t challenge a post doesn’t mean they necessarily agree with it, not enough time in the day. How would verifying who Mila Joy is validate or disqualify hard numbers? Argue the content, not the source.

Agree 100%, been saying this forever. Don’t agree with a post, prove it wrong instead of wagging your finger at the source.

No one has said take something for facts simply because they post it, that’s what you said. I simply said don’t dismiss a post simply because you don’t know or like the source. That’s sad. Go to the trouble of looking into yourself and if you can prove it false, great. And as far as the personal attacks, that’s nothing I can fix, that falls to the moderators.

No really, post valid data that actually counters Reagan’s post.

Exactly right, even the National Enquirer scooped big stories, Rush Limbaugh, Tiger Woods and John Edwards. It’s easier to dismiss the source if you can’t dispute the information.

Doesn’t matter, if these aren’t facts, prove it.

Merry Christmas, everyone!

[Hidden Content] Once again, democrats place Americans last.

Wow, Georgia politicians say there’s no problem. Good enough, lol.

Shocker

🤦‍♂️

His legacy will be a safe border, one of most important responsibilities of the federal government. That will stand until the next democrat is elected.

Take a look at the articles from each correspondent you listed (which I’m sure you haven’t bothered to do). Maybe a little biased, lol. Trump has supposedly told tens of thousands of lies, surely you guys can recall some without help from media.

List the specific lies associated with each of those. Spell out the big picture for me.

He’s wearing a cape in the poster I have on my wall.