Jump to content

Crosby at Dayton Predictions


WOSgrad

Who wins???????????  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins???????????

    • Dayton
      41
    • Crosby
      15


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 300
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="Smoking Baby" post="1276492" timestamp="1348138355"]
OK Dayton, I need me one of those purple horse hats.  If Price beats my Eagles tomorrow I am defecting.......... ;) ;)  Only one stipulation, I refuse to pull my teeth out.  ;D ;D
[/quote] You really should stop smokin that stuff...  ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tigersvoice
[quote name="liltex" post="1276442" timestamp="1348111493"]
Dayt 67 Crosby 4  ;)
[/quote]

Holding the Broncos to 67 points while scoring two safeties - that Crosby defense was cookin'.  :D

(And, yes, I know it is liltex's prediction.  I'm just playing along with his numbers.) :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Smoking Baby" post="1276492" timestamp="1348138355"]
OK Dayton, I need me one of those purple horse hats.  If Price beats my Eagles tomorrow I am defecting.......... ;) ;)  Only one stipulation, I refuse to pull my teeth out.  ;D ;D
[/quote]will you at least have relations with a goat. Besides I would hate for you to be toothless at one of our games. You would need security every bathroom visit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="bronco pride" post="1276538" timestamp="1348147584"]
[quote author=Smoking Baby link=topic=103214.msg1276492#msg1276492 date=1348138355]
OK Dayton, I need me one of those purple horse hats.  If Price beats my Eagles tomorrow I am defecting.......... ;) ;)  Only one stipulation, I refuse to pull my teeth out.  ;D ;D
[/quote]will you at least have relations with a goat. Besides I would hate for you to be toothless at one of our games. You would need security every bathroom visit.
[/quote] :o
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok back to the subject on hand. I got to check out some the the bronx practice yesterday and im feeling alot more confident about a bronco victory by a pretty good margin. I know crosby runs a hurry up offense which is great when its working. Problem  is when its not your defense stays on the field all night. I dont see crosby moving the ball consistantly on this bronco defense which will make the already fast bronco offense look even faster as the game wears on. I think the bronx break 30 and dont see crosby getting more than 17.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="bronco pride" post="1276566" timestamp="1348150253"]
Ok back to the subject on hand. I got to check out some the the bronx practice yesterday and im feeling alot more confident about a bronco victory by a pretty good margin. I know crosby runs a hurry up offense which is great when its working. Problem  is when its not your defense stays on the field all night. I dont see crosby moving the ball consistantly on this bronco defense which will make the already fast bronco offense look even faster as the game wears on. I think the bronx break 30 and dont see crosby getting more than 17.
[/quote] I don't know bout the score... But I do know that the Broncos are working their tails off... Dayton by a few but not a blow out.. Would be nice though.. make that much more fun :)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went and watched Crosby scrimmage Mag. West before the regular season started, I wasn't impressed by either team.They both looked flat, but from what I have read and heard from different people Crosby is playing much better now, just like most teams are after a few games.

This is what I think will determine how this game goes if Dayton can get the offense to fire on all cylinders and the defense cotains Crosby's deep pass and speed of the twins Dayton by 16+, but if Dayton does not play lights out it will be a close game till times up. I still pick Dayton but only by 6 because we have Carranco. Either way the game goes I'll still be here supporting Dayton and eating crow afterwards if we lose.

Oh and by the way Crosby Sucks.     
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="cougar14" post="1276428" timestamp="1348109811"]
I don't know many all-americans that don't dominate in high school. 19 per catch in a running offense is pretty dominant. NS ran a lot his way and many nights stood out as the most physical kids on the field. Ask a Westbrook fan. During the years Rollison would have been there Todd and Newton were the qbs. If he redshirted Frazier would have been there. And Mangino did say that but it was the common sentiment being echoed throughout Lawrence, the Michigan coaches thought higher of him than that. You sound like you used to be one of those guys that used to hand out gatorade and fresh towels at Bronco games 'cause he couldn't get any run. But hey, at least now you can say you know more about Texas football than the BR. . . . . And how many squirts it takes to get to the bottom of a gatorade bottle.
[/quote]

20 yards a game receiving.  Call it what you want.  So what you're saying is that he's a good blocking TE that everybody thought was the savior for UT football.  Ok, glad we got that covered.  I'm going to say this one more time slowly so you can let it sink in.  Rollison was never in any type of competition with Newton.  They were never on the same field together.  Todd was a senior when Rollison was a true Freshmen.  Not many true freshmen see the field over a senior incumbent.  Incumbent means the guy that already has the job.  Just saving you some time. 
As far as your other cousin and Reesing, could you quit back tracking.  First you said everybody was calling him the next Reesing.  When I called you on that, you said Mangino told him that on a recruiting trip.  Now you're familiar with the "common sentiments" in Lawrence, Kansas?  Now we're bringing Michigan into this?  Was he also the next "Shoelace?" 
As far as what I did on the field, I was a two year starter and made all district both years.  I'm not Barrett Matthews, but I'm only one NCAA Td reception behind him.  He's got me by a significant amount in the TD drop department though. 

With regard to Friday, how about a little wager?  If Dayton loses, I'll agree to come on here, eat my crow and then never post again.  If Crosby loses youll agree to do the same.  Deal?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="Mike Latorice" post="1277038" timestamp="1348182072"]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=103214.msg1276428#msg1276428 date=1348109811]
I don't know many all-americans that don't dominate in high school. 19 per catch in a running offense is pretty dominant. NS ran a lot his way and many nights stood out as the most physical kids on the field. Ask a Westbrook fan. During the years Rollison would have been there Todd and Newton were the qbs. If he redshirted Frazier would have been there. And Mangino did say that but it was the common sentiment being echoed throughout Lawrence, the Michigan coaches thought higher of him than that. You sound like you used to be one of those guys that used to hand out gatorade and fresh towels at Bronco games 'cause he couldn't get any run. But hey, at least now you can say you know more about Texas football than the BR. . . . . And how many squirts it takes to get to the bottom of a gatorade bottle.
[/quote]

20 yards a game receiving.  Call it what you want.  So what you're saying is that he's a good blocking TE that everybody thought was the savior for UT football.  Ok, glad we got that covered.  I'm going to say this one more time slowly so you can let it sink in.  Rollison was never in any type of competition with Newton.  They were never on the same field together.  Todd was a senior when Rollison was a true Freshmen.  Not many true freshmen see the field over a senior incumbent.  Incumbent means the guy that already has the job.  Just saving you some time. 
As far as your other cousin and Reesing, could you quit back tracking.  First you said everybody was calling him the next Reesing.  When I called you on that, you said Mangino told him that on a recruiting trip.  Now you're familiar with the "common sentiments" in Lawrence, Kansas?  Now we're bringing Michigan into this?  Was he also the next "Shoelace?" 
As far as what I did on the field, I was a two year starter and made all district both years.  I'm not Barrett Matthews, but I'm only one NCAA Td reception behind him.  He's got me by a significant amount in the TD drop department though. 

With regard to Friday, how about a little wager?  If Dayton loses, I'll agree to come on here, eat my crow and then never post again.  If Crosby loses youll agree to do the same.  Deal?
[/quote]What years were those? I was all-district twice, first team senior year. Was 1-2 against Dayton though. I'll let the systems and comparison thing rest because I think you're trying to say something I'm not. If you actually read what I said you wouldn't repeat the same post. I didn't say anything about him being a savior, they wrote the article. I agree with your assessment of him. And on the Rollison thing if you do the arithmetic you would see what I'm saying on eligibility. On the wager, we talking ever post on SETX? 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="cougar14" post="1277100" timestamp="1348187826"]
[quote author=Mike Latorice link=topic=103214.msg1277038#msg1277038 date=1348182072]
[quote author=cougar14 link=topic=103214.msg1276428#msg1276428 date=1348109811]
I don't know many all-americans that don't dominate in high school. 19 per catch in a running offense is pretty dominant. NS ran a lot his way and many nights stood out as the most physical kids on the field. Ask a Westbrook fan. During the years Rollison would have been there Todd and Newton were the qbs. If he redshirted Frazier would have been there. And Mangino did say that but it was the common sentiment being echoed throughout Lawrence, the Michigan coaches thought higher of him than that. You sound like you used to be one of those guys that used to hand out gatorade and fresh towels at Bronco games 'cause he couldn't get any run. But hey, at least now you can say you know more about Texas football than the BR. . . . . And how many squirts it takes to get to the bottom of a gatorade bottle.
[/quote]

20 yards a game receiving.  Call it what you want.  So what you're saying is that he's a good blocking TE that everybody thought was the savior for UT football.  Ok, glad we got that covered.  I'm going to say this one more time slowly so you can let it sink in.  Rollison was never in any type of competition with Newton.  They were never on the same field together.  Todd was a senior when Rollison was a true Freshmen.  Not many true freshmen see the field over a senior incumbent.  Incumbent means the guy that already has the job.  Just saving you some time. 
As far as your other cousin and Reesing, could you quit back tracking.  First you said everybody was calling him the next Reesing.  When I called you on that, you said Mangino told him that on a recruiting trip.  Now you're familiar with the "common sentiments" in Lawrence, Kansas?  Now we're bringing Michigan into this?  Was he also the next "Shoelace?" 
As far as what I did on the field, I was a two year starter and made all district both years.  I'm not Barrett Matthews, but I'm only one NCAA Td reception behind him.  He's got me by a significant amount in the TD drop department though. 

With regard to Friday, how about a little wager?  If Dayton loses, I'll agree to come on here, eat my crow and then never post again.  If Crosby loses youll agree to do the same.  Deal?
[/quote]What years were those? I was all-district twice, first team senior year. Was 1-2 against Dayton though. I'll let the systems and comparison thing rest because I think you're trying to say something I'm not. If you actually read what I said you wouldn't repeat the same post. I didn't say anything about him being a savior, they wrote the article. I agree with your assessment of him. And on the Rollison thing if you do the arithmetic you would see what I'm saying on eligibility. On the wager, we talking ever post on SETX?
[/quote]

94-95. yes, ever.  Are you that confident in those 5'2" twins?  Put your money where your mouth is.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,985
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    SVD Beaumont
    Newest Member
    SVD Beaumont
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Where were the 8 Omaha teams in D1's preseason top 25 poll... 2. Florida 8. A&M 9. Tennessee 13. N.C.State 14. Virginia 15. North Carolina Kentucky - unranked Florida State - unranked
    • That TDS is really flaring. Now do Biden. You have way, way, way more material. And keep that bitter "you are better than me" jealousy tone you have with Trump. You know Biden, the one you want everyone to vote for instead of Trump. Somehow you didn't acknowledge my pleas for you to die a painful death. I was quite certain that is how you would have interpreted my previous post. I guess when your focus is Trump 24/7, nothing else matters.
    • I have a better one. The point that nobody wants to acknowledge is that Dems are crossing over to vote Trump in the primaries and in the general so he will win the presidency. That way Trump will get the blame when the Dems implement their sinister plan to deport all of the minorities in the country. They have already laid the groundwork...convincing everyone that Trump and Republicans are racist (without providing any proof). Then it will be just a matter of time to execute their White supremacy plan of the great purge of the dirty, unwashed, heathen, non-Whites that roam freely in this country. I think my theory is more viable than your theory. Maybe we can get some other ridiculous scenarios so we can start a poll.
    • But that’s what Trump’s fanboys don’t understand.  When he talked about sexually assaulting women, y’all laughed it off as “locker room talk.”  When it was proven that he raped E. Jean Carroll, you cried that it was all an injustice… a lie. Even though he’d already confessed to doing the same thing to other women.  John McCain has suffered and sacrificed more for his country than practically anybody, except possible gold star families… and Trump called him a loser or something to that effect. “Oh, it was a joke that no one was supposed to take seriously.” But when Trump, after disrespecting the sacrifices of one of our most valiant, y’all are like “just because Trump didn’t go to Omaha Beach doesn’t mean he isn’t pro military!” Really? All you have to do is listen to what he said about McCain’s service. Not McCain as an opponent, not McCain’s political views… about the fact that the man was tortured, probably raped, and who knows what all else for over five years for swearing an oath and putting on the uniform.  But all of y’all supposedly “pro military” people just laughed along with Trump. “Good one, Sir! Maverick my new-hind! Filthy Rino!”  I don’t understand how the same people (y’all) who probably always say “thank you for your service” to any veteran still support a guy who craps on the ones who suffered the most on our behalf.  It’s baffling. 
    • Wow. Do you actually believe your little scenario has any chance of alleviating you of your moral immaturity? Deflection at it's best...or worse. You seem to be a sad case. If you died today, I would be remiss if not attributing your cause of death to severe TDS, and of course, Covid. Look at that. I just made a joke about your death. You did not get offended. Nobody was offended. Not one person will accuse me of being hateful towards fellow human beings. But yet, you hate Trump because he made a similar crude comment about McCain. You tried to attribute that comment as evidence Trump hates the military. What grade level of schoolchildren do you think is laughing at you for that "less that adolescent" (hint, hint) comment. You used one crude comment in an attempt to justify your TDS. Now, when called on it, you try to deflect the whole topic. You are certainly not having any fun with this, but you sure are providing entertainment for the board. It's a shame you can't join in on the fun. I think even Big Girl might be to the point of giggling at the shamelessness you are exhibiting.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...