Jump to content

brownwood vs bridge port


Recommended Posts

[quote name="BIG_BOB" post="914005" timestamp="1290229081"]
Kind of out of reach though Skooter they could slack off a bit. I mean if they are that good let some of the back ups play and run the clock out just my opinion seems chicken**** to run the score up. Like I stated just an opinion im not a coach. Just seems like common courtesy.
[/quote]

I see your point Big_Bob.. but its a double edged sword at this point. Do you call the dogs off and not risk the chance of getting any of your starting players hurt? Or do you keep em going 4 quarters full speed and keep them conditioned? Its a tough call either way..but if they are as good as they are made out to be.. calling the dogs off would be the best choice. There may come a time when they will be up against a team that is out for blood just as much as a win. And a win at all cost. A win that could result in having one of thier key players out for the season. Seems like too much of a gamble for me to keep them in at all times. But, Im not the coach, so it really isn't anyones call but his. *shrugs*
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess you could say im old fashion or something of that nature because if your that great of a team" MONSTER" no sense in showing how many points you can put on a team that is just not on the same level. Maybe some will call it competitive spirit, Ill state my opinion and call it having little or no class.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="BIG_BOB" post="914064" timestamp="1290232175"]
I guess you could say im old fashion or something of that nature because if your that great of a team" MONSTER" no sense in showing how many points you can put on a team that is just not on the same level. Maybe some will call it competitive spirit, Ill state my opinion and call it having little or no class.
[/quote]I can see your point. I can also see a team that just can't lay down to a team and just not score. Not the Lions fault the Bulls couldn't stop them. Who was at the game? Did the starters play the whole game?? I wanna hear from someone that was at the game.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scooter, I was not at the game--but I listened to the whole game on the internet. As far as I could tell, Shipley pulled starters in the 4th quarter and played many back-ups through-out the period. During the 4th qtr. they kept the ball on the ground and kept running the clock out. The Brownwood announcers know that team really well and let you know when there is a sub in. They did not keep their foot on the gas this game, Bridgeport just couldn't stop them. Ex.  Bwd had a 95 yd. drive that only took 3 min.'s. They score very quickly.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="NDN79" post="914299" timestamp="1290270879"]
Scooter, I was not at the game--but I listened to the whole game on the internet. As far as I could tell, Shipley pulled starters in the 4th quarter and played many back-ups through-out the period. During the 4th qtr. they kept the ball on the ground and kept running the clock out. The Brownwood announcers know that team really well and let you know when there is a sub in. They did not keep their foot on the gas this game, Bridgeport just couldn't stop them. Ex.  Bwd had a 95 yd. drive that only took 3 min.'s. They score very quickly.
[/quote]Thank you. I figured he pulled the starters out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name="rollinac" post="913972" timestamp="1290227466"]
I guess Bridgeport must be hitting late and taking cheap shots.  Or maybe Brownwood just likes to run up the score...
[/quote]

I didn't buy his reasoning on running up the score last week. Even though I was there and saw several of those cheapshots, I found it disingenuous to use that as a reason to run it up. Coach Shipley has always ran the score up when he's had the chance to. He didn't get to run it up much at Coppell because he found out that playing against teams every week that had as good or better athletes than he had meant it wasn't going to happen. I'd have a bit of respect for him if he'd just come out and say he likes to run it up. I'd at least respect his honesty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
    • The Republican Party is dying because of folks like you who want to compromise with socialists and folks that proclaim “from the river to the sea” in reference to Israel.  I don’t want a party that folks such as yourself want to save, may as well be democrats, which you apparently are. My standards haven’t changed, yours have.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...