Jump to content

Lumberton vs Nederland


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name="BMTSoulja1" post="878247" timestamp="1287332328"]
Ned 29-20... Lumberton did beat Livingston, but Nederland is not a running team.  Pretty balanced.   Plu their defense I crappy.  Lumberton I the favorates in this game but will look pas this Nederland team and will be in for a rud awakening...
[/quote]
Lumberton will look past Nederland...because they have Central the next week?? Nah, coaches won't let that happen. Every game is a fight in this district this year and no team should be judged by their records nor overlooked. Lumberton may lose, but it won't be because they are looking past Nederland.

Lumberton is capable of beating Nederland...just depends on which Lumberton team shows up to play. We can't have the turnovers we had against PNG. IMO, that was a major factor in the score in that game...5 turnovers...some when we were (probably) about to score. Or turning it over giving them excellent field position. Can't do that and expect to win or even stay close as the score showed.
From what I hear, Nederland's defense has problems too. If Lumberton can cut out the turnovers and penalties, it may be another game like Livingston. Down to the wire and hopefully Lumberton on the winning side ;D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...