Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
46 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

I want to know which "nuclear threats" were destroyed? The one's from the 1980's, the 1990's, 2000's, 2010's????

 

Because "any day now" and all...📣🦜

lol saw this on other site

Actually, 1980 was about the Shah.

Posted

Anyone having sympathy for Israel anf not holding Conald and others accountable for this is hypocrites! Should've never got rid of JCPOA without another deal on the table! But but but the D's funded this, yet they waited til we had a "strong" president to attack lol.. defend by all means

Fast forward to yesterday and the clown in chief says along with his lost looking VP, a complete ceasefire would be in effect in 6 hours. Then Iran hits again and Israel is ready to retaliate.... so much peace in the middle east 

My biggest take away is you have ppl and even on this board that if you dont agree with something or speak outta disagreement with the clown your un-American, want the country to fail etc. We have no business butting in that conflict. Tulsi says no threat of nukes and others say a threat. Which is it? This changes how? This will be an ongoing issue til all of is are dead.  Smdh

Posted
22 minutes ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Anyone having sympathy for Israel anf not holding Conald and others accountable for this is hypocrites! Should've never got rid of JCPOA without another deal on the table! But but but the D's funded this, yet they waited til we had a "strong" president to attack lol.. defend by all means

Fast forward to yesterday and the clown in chief says along with his lost looking VP, a complete ceasefire would be in effect in 6 hours. Then Iran hits again and Israel is ready to retaliate.... so much peace in the middle east 

My biggest take away is you have ppl and even on this board that if you dont agree with something or speak outta disagreement with the clown your un-American, want the country to fail etc. We have no business butting in that conflict. Tulsi says no threat of nukes and others say a threat. Which is it? This changes how? This will be an ongoing issue til all of is are dead.  Smdh

This I can agree with…..but my reasons may be different than yours.  
 

Posted
4 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Anyone having sympathy for Israel anf not holding Conald and others accountable for this is hypocrites! Should've never got rid of JCPOA without another deal on the table! But but but the D's funded this, yet they waited til we had a "strong" president to attack lol.. defend by all means

Fast forward to yesterday and the clown in chief says along with his lost looking VP, a complete ceasefire would be in effect in 6 hours. Then Iran hits again and Israel is ready to retaliate.... so much peace in the middle east 

My biggest take away is you have ppl and even on this board that if you dont agree with something or speak outta disagreement with the clown your un-American, want the country to fail etc. We have no business butting in that conflict. Tulsi says no threat of nukes and others say a threat. Which is it? This changes how? This will be an ongoing issue til all of is are dead.  Smdh

JCPOA provisions expired this year, and Iran wasn’t abiding by the stipulations even before Trump cancelled it. The Europeans and UN are/were just spineless & even complicit.

Not saying the U.S. is totally clean. Our government has been meddling in Iran since ‘53. Heck, we even helped them start their initial nuclear program. (Eisenhower & Atoms for Peace in ‘57.)  Many missteps. This latest strike wasn’t one of them. It may—I emphasize ‘may’—help start a clean slate.

The date of the below link is interesting.

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
1 hour ago, OlDawg said:

JCPOA provisions expired this year, and Iran wasn’t abiding by the stipulations even before Trump cancelled it. The Europeans and UN are/were just spineless & even complicit.

Not saying the U.S. is totally clean. Our government has been meddling in Iran since ‘53. Heck, we even helped them start their initial nuclear program. (Eisenhower & Atoms for Peace in ‘57.)  Many missteps. This latest strike wasn’t one of them. It may—I emphasize ‘may’—help start a clean slate.

The date of the below link is interesting.

This is the hidden content, please

President Trump blasted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday over remarks suggesting Iran’s allies could supply it with nuclear warheads as Tehran promises to retaliate for U.S. strikes on its nuclear facilities.  
I hope we haven’t put ourselves in a awkward position.

Posted

I will throw my thoughts here just because…

I honestly think Trump—for all his faults—is not a warmonger & doesn't want military conflict. In this, I think he’s somewhat similar to my old CIC (R. Reagan).

If he can get a reset with Iran, now is the time, and he’s the person in the moment. He has the benefit of not needing oil from the Middle East as the U.S. currently produces over 2X what the next largest producing country does (Saudi Arabia), and almost as much as the rest of the world’s producers combined. The U.S. is also the largest producer of natural gas. We aren’t at the whims of oil prices due to ME conflicts like we used to be.

I believe I also recently read where the U.S. still has the largest strategic stockpile of oil in the world (somewhere around 265MM barrels) as a buffer.

The people of Iran need to make a change if they choose. Otherwise, it’ll be the same spiral. Good news is, the other ME countries are more supportive than in the past.

This could actually work.

Posted
6 minutes ago, DCT said:

President Trump blasted former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev on Monday over remarks suggesting Iran’s allies could supply it with nuclear warheads as Tehran promises to retaliate for U.S. strikes on its nuclear facilities.  
I hope we haven’t put ourselves in a awkward position.

Russia is—and has always been—a paper tiger. If people really knew what the U.S. has in their arsenal, they would not believe it. To this day, the U.S. can track any Soviet sub anywhere/any time & them never even know we’re there.

But yes…I agree with your last.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,283
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CoachFeller
    Newest Member
    CoachFeller
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...