Trump Effect

[Porter]

7 hours ago, ErroneousBIG said:

Yes… if it were done BEFORE those six justices re-litigated and then eviscerated the Voting Rights Act. Immediately followed by an off-cycle redistricting which is almost unheard of. 
 

Americans just voted a year and a half ago and selected their representation. If the same election were held today, you’d have republicans winning 25+ more seats by most estimations… without a single person changing their vote.  That’s not a democracy, it’s cheating to steal elections. And it’s not some made-up fairy tale about election fraud that is believed with nary a shred of truth… this one is actually happening, and it’s happening before our eyes.  And it will lead to bloodshed, in my opinion.  

😂 File an appeal. Trust the process. 

[Porter]

36 minutes ago, ErroneousBIG said:

That won’t stop the racists. They stopped the election in Louisiana this month after votes were already being cast. 
 

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

You can call it whatever you want… the 15th and 19th Amendments were passed by Congress, signed by the president, and ratified by the States…. But the Voting Rights Act was enacted in 1965 to enforce those previous Amendments because the white racists in the South were doing the same thing that the white racists in the South are doing today. It’s just textbook Jim Crow Era racism.  
 

CB,The MissingBand and now your Erroneous Big?! 
 

How creative 😂

[baddog]

1 hour ago, ErroneousBIG said:

 

 

Currently, there are 12 states that have no Democrats representing them in the U.S. Congress (across both the Senate and the House of Representatives). [

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

]

These all-Republican state congressional delegations are:

• Alaska
• Arkansas
• Idaho
• Iowa
• Montana
• Nebraska
• North Dakota
• Oklahoma
• South Dakota
• Utah
• West Virginia
• Wyoming [
  This is the hidden content, please

  • Sign In
  • or
  • Sign Up
  ]

And your point was?

I should have posted both. My point is where are the minority concerns in both cases? 

[ErroneousBIG]

2 hours ago, OlDawg said:

Out of curiosity, how many profiles did you create?

Just one. 

[ErroneousBIG]

2 hours ago, Porter said:

😂 File an appeal. Trust the process. 

You know better than that… all we can do is flip (or stack) the court and have them rule it back into place.  That’s the problem with flipping the makeup of the court and then reversing precedent.  The justices were never supposed to be partisan hacks, but here we are. 

[ErroneousBIG]

1 hour ago, baddog said:

I should have posted both. My point is where are the minority concerns in both cases? 

The concern isn’t whether an area is more heavily r or d…. It’s a mid-census redistricting that eliminates minority representation. 
 

You wouldn’t have a problem if the democrats suddenly redistricted your neighborhood in an off-census cycle and Sheila Jackson Lee suddenly became your state representative?  
 

I don’t care if everybody in ND is a Republican. I don’t care if everybody in NH wants is a Democrat. What I can’t stand for is when we have an election, then a little over a year later the rules change so that the ruling party can say “Guess what? We hold four out of seven seats, but next time we’ll have all seven because we redrew the maps!!!”