Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
59 minutes ago, baddog said:

Whatever you think, Skippy.

This is what you post when you know you have no answer for what I posted, name calling or à laughing emoji. Lol

Thats what I think Spanky! 

Posted
2 hours ago, Boyz N Da Hood said:

Depends when you consider America was great!? Lets start there

MAGA is everything but what so called conservatives stand for

I've never found the concept of MAGA that difficult to understand. I guess everyone could have an opinion of when America was great, or maybe some people think that America was never great.....

I remember a time when folks went to school with shotguns in the back glass of a pick up.....and no one one got shot and no one stole the gun.....and that was in Port Arthur in 1981........ We fought in school and after school and no one was stabbed or shot.......most kids had 2 parents...... I honestly wouldn't mind going back to that time.......

Posted

GeneralMCNews (also known as "The General" on social media platforms) is not a legitimate, reputable news outlet and is frequently identified as a source of misinformation. [
This is the hidden content, please
]
  • Editorial Standards: They do not adhere to professional journalistic standards or fact-checking processes. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Content Type: The account primarily shares unverified claims, conspiracy theories, and alarmist political commentary rather than objective reporting. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Fact-Check Track Record: GeneralMCNews has a history of spreading debunked rumors, including circulating false information about international treaties and unsubstantiated political allegations. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    , 
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
Posted
31 minutes ago, baddog said:

 

GeneralMCNews (also known as "The General" on social media platforms) is not a legitimate, reputable news outlet and is frequently identified as a source of misinformation. [
This is the hidden content, please
]
  • Editorial Standards: They do not adhere to professional journalistic standards or fact-checking processes. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Content Type: The account primarily shares unverified claims, conspiracy theories, and alarmist political commentary rather than objective reporting. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Fact-Check Track Record: GeneralMCNews has a history of spreading debunked rumors, including circulating false information about international treaties and unsubstantiated political allegations. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    , 
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]

So what you’re saying is you are still waiting for Bondi to release the Epstein Binder 2? 
 

Did you fact check the fact checker? 

Posted
36 minutes ago, baddog said:

 

GeneralMCNews (also known as "The General" on social media platforms) is not a legitimate, reputable news outlet and is frequently identified as a source of misinformation. [
This is the hidden content, please
]
  • Editorial Standards: They do not adhere to professional journalistic standards or fact-checking processes. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Content Type: The account primarily shares unverified claims, conspiracy theories, and alarmist political commentary rather than objective reporting. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]
  • Fact-Check Track Record: GeneralMCNews has a history of spreading debunked rumors, including circulating false information about international treaties and unsubstantiated political allegations. [
    This is the hidden content, please
    , 
    This is the hidden content, please
    ]

You may want to check your facts checker. Lol

Grok says - 

Pam Bondi appeared yesterday, May 29th,No, she wasn’t required to testify under before the House Oversight Committee in a closed-door transcribed interview about the DOJ’s handling and release of the Epstein files—not a formal sworn deposition. The committee had subpoenaed her earlier for a deposition under oath, but after she was ousted as AG, Chairman Comer downgraded it to a voluntary transcribed interview. That means she could decline certain questions—like ones about Trump—and wasn’t bound by oath. Democrats and Epstein survivors called it a cover-up or sham, demanding she testify publicly under oath instead. She admitted some redaction errors but shifted blame to others like Todd Blanche and the FBI. The transcript will likely be released, but it lacks the legal weight of sworn testimony. Whether she’ll face a real subpoena for sworn testimony in the future depends on the committee—Democrats are pushing for it, but it’s not guaranteed. This setup let her appear cooperative without full accountability.

Posted
38 minutes ago, baddog said:

You post from garbage sites. Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn every now and then. Why not post from acceptable sites?

You obviously have no clue how x works. 
Acceptable sites like the mainstream media? Lol

You’re clueless about how X works. 
 

You always attack the messenger instead of the message because you don’t like anything that makes your daddy Trump look bad. lol

It has nothing to do with squirrels and nuts, I am just not blinded by the color orange.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,775
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Kglov1017
    Newest Member
    Kglov1017
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...