Jump to content

C4L sends a message...


PNG Proud

Recommended Posts

He asked me to relay the message that he apologizes for not getting on here sooner, but he's working alot and has very limited pc time, but he will get on here in the next few days (and get what's coming to him).  I think he's been looking for a good crow recipe. ;D

I think he also has another message too....  Stay Tuned

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He asked me to relay the message that he apologizes for not getting on here sooner, but he's working alot and has very limited pc time, but he will get on here in the next few days (and get what's coming to him).   I think he's been looking for a good crow recipe. ;D

I think he also has another message too....  Stay Tuned

How many think C4L would have found a computer and used his limited time to a least gave his take on a LaMarque win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know C4L and can tell you that he's a stand-up guy with an impeccable reputation when it comes to dishing it out and taking his lumps when warranted. As far as him having a "told you so" mentality, sure he might have a little fun with you had the tables been turned but he'd done so in good taste...he'll be around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I must say this to all of you Im from PN-G if you dont already know I  can honestly say that C4L is a standup guy he and I talked for several weeks leading up to the PN-G matchup with LaMarque in 1999 and after our win he was the first person on the forums to tell me congrats and other compliments. He is about a big of a highschool football fan as you will find on here he will probably make more highschool football games the resrt of this season than you will. So guys cut  him some slack you will have your chance to say what you like to him very soon.

Goodluck to Lumberton and congrats on your win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may not like him - but - C4L knows high school football pretty well.  He will be back for his crow!

I know him AND I like him... He is a cool guy and just likes to have fun with people online. He will be back. I am a little surprised that he has not been back already though,, but I am sure it was a bit of a blow.... I know it was, go back and read his absolute prediction. He did not "THINK" the Cougars were going to win, he "KNEW" they were.  8)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rarely misses a prediction. this was a big one to miss. I have been reading his predictions on other boards for 2 or 3 years and this is honestly the 1st I remember him missing. EX: last year predicted dayton to lose (he said reality pipe upsead the head) this year he said TC would get punked.  :-\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...