Jump to content

Beaumont United (14) @ Port Neches-Groves (45) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, outanup said:

Only 32 kids inn the United Band? And the football team catching an a$$ whooping… Something is wrong up there,all kidding aside…. 

I’m confused.  With all the kids walking then hallways, many just not interested in band for whatever reason.  Apparently we’re not interested in football either…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alpha Wolf said:

I wouldn't normally agree with this kind of comment buttttt...

Look at the product!! There’s no way no team in the area should be 38 at the end of the game better than BU. This is at halftime!! I don’t see how they can’t even put together a decent team. This has to be probably the easiest game the $5 ndn’s will have all year!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...