Jump to content

Question about a rule


WOSdrummer99

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Fg attempt blocked but caught by kicking team. Then ran into end zone by kicking team. No TD. Is this correct?

At first i thought not. But why can the other team advance the ball and possibly score? Maybe it's that a kicked ball cannot be advanced by the kicking team. Is that also true on a kickoff?

I believe that’s correct. The kicking team can’t advance the ball on FGs or kickoff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is blocked and never crosses the line of scrimmage either team can advance the ball. 
 

now if it is blocked but passes the line of scrimmage only the defense can advance the ball, if it’s an extra point the offense can pick the ball up but it’s then a dead ball and the extra point is no good, if it is a field goal attempt and it is blocked but passes the line of scrimmage it is then considered a punt and the kicking team can down the ball wherever they touch it at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, EAGLEFOREVER said:

Kicking team can’t advance an onside kick

If the receiving team catches the onside kick and starts and runs and fumble the ball it can be advanced. Muff rule, just like a dropped punt cannot be advanced neither can a onside kick unless the receiving team run and control the ball then fumbles.   
A few years back I think it was Central playing PN-G and Central scored and went up by 2points and PN-G blocked the xtra point and run it back for 2points and tied the game. PN-G won in OT.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, purpleeagle said:

If the receiving team catches the onside kick and starts and runs and fumble the ball it can be advanced. Muff rule, just like a dropped punt cannot be advanced neither can a onside kick unless the receiving team run and control the ball then fumbles.   
A few years back I think it was Central playing PN-G and Central scored and went up by 2points and PN-G blocked the xtra point and run it back for 2points and tied the game. PN-G won in OT.

 

I remember with in the late 80's or early 90's Lumberton set up to kick a pat to go 1 point ahead of WOS for our first ever win against them. Needless to say they blocked the PAT and ran it back for 2 points with no time left. That sucked....😒

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, raideroldtimer said:

I remember with in the late 80's or early 90's Lumberton set up to kick a pat to go 1 point ahead of WOS for our first ever win against them. Needless to say they blocked the PAT and ran it back for 2 points with no time left. That sucked....😒

Looking at our history. Maybe that was the last time we played in 2003. WOS 14-7 Probably a blocked FG we ran back for a TD. Heartbreak

Also the last time we missed the playoffs. We lost to Nederland and Central.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m under the impression that once it leaves the kickers foot, it’s a change of possession.   Kicking team can’t recover, and retain possession, or advance the ball.

Once it crosses the LOS, and if the defensive team touches, and muffs the ball, it can be recovered by the kicking team, but not advanced.

If the defensive team recovers the ball, advances the ball, then fumbles, then the kicking team could recover and advance the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,986
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    fgzfdgvxv
    Newest Member
    fgzfdgvxv
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Final 1A top-10 list (From THSB): Final 1A Top 10 Rankings 1Ira (24-0) 2Fayetteville (18-5) 3Chester (24-11) 4Abbott (16-11-1) 5D’Hanis (21-7) 6Neches (19-13) 7Dodd City (16-7) 8Morton (15-7) 9Electra (19-5) 10Brookeland (16-3)     Chester and Brookeland making the list.  Pretty good showing for the 24-2A district.  Congratulations to the Yellowjackets of Chester and The Wildcats of Brookeland.
    • Where were the 8 Omaha teams in D1's preseason top 25 poll... 2. Florida 8. A&M 9. Tennessee 13. N.C.State 14. Virginia 15. North Carolina Kentucky - unranked Florida State - unranked
    • That TDS is really flaring. Now do Biden. You have way, way, way more material. And keep that bitter "you are better than me" jealousy tone you have with Trump. You know Biden, the one you want everyone to vote for instead of Trump. Somehow you didn't acknowledge my pleas for you to die a painful death. I was quite certain that is how you would have interpreted my previous post. I guess when your focus is Trump 24/7, nothing else matters.
    • I have a better one. The point that nobody wants to acknowledge is that Dems are crossing over to vote Trump in the primaries and in the general so he will win the presidency. That way Trump will get the blame when the Dems implement their sinister plan to deport all of the minorities in the country. They have already laid the groundwork...convincing everyone that Trump and Republicans are racist (without providing any proof). Then it will be just a matter of time to execute their White supremacy plan of the great purge of the dirty, unwashed, heathen, non-Whites that roam freely in this country. I think my theory is more viable than your theory. Maybe we can get some other ridiculous scenarios so we can start a poll.
    • But that’s what Trump’s fanboys don’t understand.  When he talked about sexually assaulting women, y’all laughed it off as “locker room talk.”  When it was proven that he raped E. Jean Carroll, you cried that it was all an injustice… a lie. Even though he’d already confessed to doing the same thing to other women.  John McCain has suffered and sacrificed more for his country than practically anybody, except possible gold star families… and Trump called him a loser or something to that effect. “Oh, it was a joke that no one was supposed to take seriously.” But when Trump, after disrespecting the sacrifices of one of our most valiant, y’all are like “just because Trump didn’t go to Omaha Beach doesn’t mean he isn’t pro military!” Really? All you have to do is listen to what he said about McCain’s service. Not McCain as an opponent, not McCain’s political views… about the fact that the man was tortured, probably raped, and who knows what all else for over five years for swearing an oath and putting on the uniform.  But all of y’all supposedly “pro military” people just laughed along with Trump. “Good one, Sir! Maverick my new-hind! Filthy Rino!”  I don’t understand how the same people (y’all) who probably always say “thank you for your service” to any veteran still support a guy who craps on the ones who suffered the most on our behalf.  It’s baffling. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...