Jump to content

Hamshire-Fannett 69 Liberty 46/FINAL


Recommended Posts

  • AggiesAreWe changed the title to Hamshire-Fannett 69 Liberty 46/FINAL
2 hours ago, OVER THE HILL said:

i think the lesson was learned tonight.  We will see Tuesday.

Is there a magic lesson? HF is going to have to stay focused these next two games or they could easily find themselves with a 3rd place finish. I think they will beat Livingston at home but Huff will be a challenge at Huffman. They handled a Liberty club that they should beat easily. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OVER THE HILL said:

The chemistry of the last group on the floor the other night hopefully showed the coach who should be playing.  29 points in the fourth Quarter in a game that was sloppy and close until the right group of kids were on the court.  We will see if he finally figured it out on Tuesday.  

I don’t mean to question your logic but we’re 25 games into the season I don’t think they’ll be many new discoveries at this point. I think Liberty is 1-7 in district playHF should destroy them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 games into the season they still are not playing up to their capabilities and they have two kids with terrible attitudes and are extremely selfish.  I think the coach is finally seeing that he has to sit those kids down.  Like I’ve said before he’s a good guy and a I think he is at the end of his patients with those kids.  If he does sit those kids down I think they can go further in the playoffs than everyone expects.  Cardinal 1s son should be leading this team and not have to fight for the ball.  He had a great game the other night because the coach sat those kids down finally and let the kids who have no problem with him getting his points and don’t mind sharing the ball, up until that point they were struggling and could have very easily lost the game to an inferior team. As I said we will see Tuesday night, if he does make a change then they can win out if he keeps doing more of the same then they will end up in 3 rd or 4th just like the last two years and be out the first round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, OVER THE HILL said:

25 games into the season they still are not playing up to their capabilities and they have two kids with terrible attitudes and are extremely selfish.  I think the coach is finally seeing that he has to sit those kids down.  Like I’ve said before he’s a good guy and a I think he is at the end of his patients with those kids.  If he does sit those kids down I think they can go further in the playoffs than everyone expects.  Cardinal 1s son should be leading this team and not have to fight for the ball.  He had a great game the other night because the coach sat those kids down finally and let the kids who have no problem with him getting his points and don’t mind sharing the ball, up until that point they were struggling and could have very easily lost the game to an inferior team. As I said we will see Tuesday night, if he does make a change then they can win out if he keeps doing more of the same then they will end up in 3 rd or 4th just like the last two years and be out the first round.

I don’t know anything about the internal conflicts on the HF club. I do know that by the 25th game of the season EVERY coach in SE Texas knows the chemistry of his team. If a coach is still making moves this time of year it’s because he’s not pleased with the players on the floor. I wouldn’t read much into stats against a 1-7 club. HF should beat Livingston at home, the matchups favor them ( unless Livingston gets hot from behind the arc). Their challenge will be against a Huffman club that took them to OT at Hamshire. If everyone plays up their potential HF and Livingston could very well be playing a seeding game. The players everyone wants benched seem to be good scoring options when #5 is shut down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • To clarify, Dems love wars. They rage daily in the bluest of blue inner citicis. Chicago had 39 shootings over the weekend, 9 dead. Warzone. Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, etc. I am sure was just as bloody. The blue body count rises daily. I am sure the blue defunding of police and releasing murders without any bail have nothing to do with it. Right?   
    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...