Jump to content

Manvel 35 Crosby 21/FINAL


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Casey is #40 ?

against Carthage 40 had his way the entire game.  An athlete playing on the D-line.

Yes, he’s #40. Manvel had a double team on him almost all night and basically neutralized him. Still made a few plays but their scheme against him is why they probably ran for 300 yards on us. Considering the personnel on the field I thought there was very high level play in the trenches from both sides. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, I wish I could post these videos of the plays we missed. Play calling was superb last night if we just hit the open receivers.
 

We were never going going to be able to hold up to that Manvel o-line all night, especially with a back like Demontre Seymour which we probably won’t see for the rest of the year. You would’ve been able to take a whole bunch of money from me if you bet me we were going to hold them to 28 offensive points though. They used their size and pounded the ball on us at will at times but the only real mistake we made was a bad run fit on which Seymour hits us for about 70 basically untouched. Their qb went untouched on a read-option keeper but we were at the point where we had to sell out on Seymour so it was what it was. 
 

Even with Crosby getting in their own way, if we don’t have middle school level execution on the fg attempt we probably go into the half with a 10-7 lead. I mean, we roll the snap back there and kick it into one of our own linemen and it bounces right into the hands of a Manvel defender. We haven’t done that the whole 4 years Helburg has been our kicker and we probably won’t again.
 

OC dials up a double move on one play and perfectly timed wheel route Manvel busts a coverage on on another play, they’re both wide arse open and we miss them both. Crosby is driving to tie it up before the half and Manvel gets us in like 3rd and 8. Manvel plays cover 1 man under and gets pressure off the left side with the Boston College commit, qb rolls right and had been effective running so the corner comes off the WR early leaving him WIDE open for a td and we don’t even see him. We’re going to make that play. 
 

At the end of the day we’ve just played Carthage and Manvel and the defense is giving up 24ppg. We’ve given up 14 points on special teams which I know for a fact will get fixed. Offense isn’t where you want it to be but it does feel like we’re on the verge. I thought it was a lot more likely that we would be 0-2 than 2-0 at this point in the season but I feel a heck of a lot better than I thought I would. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, HikeMoncho said:

Could it be that Crosby is better than they have been given credit for? Or is Manvel not as good as expected? Or both even? 

I think we are a hesitant fan base. We don't go to State very often and have a brutal region. 

So when we talk about these games ultimately we are worried about those games against Huntsville, and Fort Bend Marshall, and Maybe Texas High. So we see someone like Manvel and we realize they will have the size and speed like a FB Marshall. Or a Carthage who has a defense very similar to Huntsville. So we are in compare mode and we have to execute to win those games. 

Now Manvel would likely beat anyone on our schedule, or in 5AD2 minus maybe Aledo. 

Carthage would beat anyone in our district, IMO. 

Now We play PAM, if we play poorly again in that one then you'll see people a little worried about this team. Especially given BH is only a couple games away. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, HikeMoncho said:

Congrats Crosby on what sounds like a great effort in a tough game!

I seem to remember a lot of predictions for Manvel to blow Crosby out… 🤔

Could it be that Crosby is better than they have been given credit for? Or is Manvel not as good as expected? Or both even? 

I think Manvel’s showing against Dickinson proved they’re as good as they’re projected to be. Dropped 42 last week on a squad that’s one of the better big 6As in the Houston area and only lost because of multiple mistakes in the kicking game. Katy Paetow is probably the only team left on their schedule that can stay within 20 points of them. They’ll need to tighten up the defense but I don’t see anybody stopping that run game before they get to Dallas. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Cougtalk said:

I think we are a hesitant fan base. We don't go to State very often and have a brutal region. 

So when we talk about these games ultimately we are worried about those games against Huntsville, and Fort Bend Marshall, and Maybe Texas High. So we see someone like Manvel and we realize they will have the size and speed like a FB Marshall. Or a Carthage who has a defense very similar to Huntsville. So we are in compare mode and we have to execute to win those games. 

Now Manvel would likely beat anyone on our schedule, or in 5AD2 minus maybe Aledo. 

Carthage would beat anyone in our district, IMO. 

Now We play PAM, if we play poorly again in that one then you'll see people a little worried about this team. Especially given BH is only a couple games away. 

 

Understood

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...